 |
 |
iTunes 5...we hardly knew thee
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anyone find it very odd that we had iTunes 4.X for over two years (since April 28, 2003). Then finally on Sept 7, 2005 they released iTunes 5. Now, only 5 weeks later, we are already on iTunes 6? I am missing something? What was the point of iTunes 5?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: case.edu
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
pb 1440x960 | 1.67, 1.5, 128, 80 | leopard
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Across the river from Trump Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Tesseract
Nano compatibility.
No. There is nothing the nano needed that wasn't there already or wouldn't have been so minor that a .x update was all that was needed. Flash memory support-> was there for the shuffle. Color screen -> iPod
|
Barack Obama: Four more years of the Carter Presidency
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Planet Express
Status:
Offline
|
|
Usually, it would've been 5.1 or even 5.5...but to go to 6.0, that's just odd.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yep, truly bizarre. And they still didn't change the colour of the icon as they did consistently from 1-4.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
They should have changed the icon color as they did with 1-4 (as previously stated). Or at least updated it etc. I also believe a 5.5 would have been appropriate... or they should have held off on 5.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nagoya
Status:
Offline
|
|
iTunes is now 'branded'.... little old ladies and middle-aged housewives have come to know the version 4+ icon as the iTunes application icon... you bet your ass apple won't be changing that icon till iTunes needs a marketing makeover / rebranding type campaign... e.g. a very long time.
|
12" iBook 1.2ghz / 1.2gb
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Most stupid update ever.
Should have been 5.1.
I like some of the features though.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
Status:
Offline
|
|
I haven't really noticed anything beyond "Video" on the bar. I agree as well, should have been a 5.1, not even worthy of a 5.5.
marketing at its finest.
|
|
MacBook Pro | 2.16 ghz core2duo | 2gb ram | superdrive | airport extreme
iBook G4 | 1.2ghz | 768mb ram | combodrive | airport extreme
iPhone 3GS | 32 GB | Jailbreak, or no Jailbreak
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator  Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Online
|
|
iTunes 5.0 should have been 4.10, and probably was 4.10 internally until some marketing genius renamed it 5.0 because people end to think 4.10=4.1. That way, the current iTunes 6 would have been iTunes 5 - much more logical.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sitting in front of computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
5 should have been 5. this should have been 5.1.
|
|
I free'd my mind... now it won't come back.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: North Coast
Status:
Offline
|
|
My guess? Apple choose 6 more so because of the iTMS update or iVMS(or whichever you like) and the video portions of the store. I'm thinking Apple hopes to tie the association of the video store with occuring the same time iTunes 6. Just my 2 cents.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Remember, it's just a number. 
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
iTunes 5.0 should have been 4.10, and probably was 4.10 internally until some marketing genius renamed it 5.0 because people end to think 4.10=4.1. That way, the current iTunes 6 would have been iTunes 5 - much more logical.
v5 was pretty substantial with tons of minor stuff as well. But there's nothing really new about 6 except for the video iTMS changes. So it's just a marketing move to mark the beginning of something that's probably going to be very big.
It will also bring version parity with the other iApps come January.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, version parity with iLife. Exactly why they did it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
