Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Applications > A new concept in Peer to Peer technology - Brightnets!

A new concept in Peer to Peer technology - Brightnets!
Thread Tools
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2006, 12:37 AM
 
Unlike traditional darknets, which were confined only to select friends and trusted associates, a new concept changes the need for such privacy. Brightnets, in contrast, are a distributed system where nobody breaks the law, so nobody needs to hide away.

An example of such a system (possibly the first), is a system called OFF, or the owner-free file system. (http://offsystem.sourceforge.net). Although the system is under heavy development, the concept is proven to work.

How does it work? Each client shares a series of 128kb "blocks", which are files filled with randomly chosen bits. These blocks are randomized when given a source file to share in the OFF system. Without the instructions to assemble these blocks, they are useless. Therefore, to download a file, one needs a special URL, similar to an ed2k URL, or a gnutella magnet URL. Every user sharing files on the network will create a unique URL for each file he is sharing.

So what does this all accomplish? Most importantly, the nodes on the network sharing bandwidth CANNOT be held responsible for copyright infringement, because they are not sharing copyrighted works. Somebody could argue that people sharing files on the OFF network are breaking the law when uploading blocks used to assemble copyrighted works, but this argument has no basis. Why? Because the blocks being shared do not in any way represent the original copyrighted work in question.

The system works, but as I mentioned above, is still under development and in heavy testing stages. The project only currently has one developer, and in order to be sustained and improved needs additional talented and competent C++ developers. If you would like to contribute, or have a question or suggestion, head on over to irc.p2pchat.net, #thebighack

All beta testers are welcome, and the latest test releases of the client can be downloaded from Index of /installers
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2006, 01:40 AM
 
Interesting.

I'm quite certain the legal argument is complete bullshˇt though.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2006, 01:49 AM
 
The DMCA still eats this for lunch, because it legislates intent.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 21, 2006, 10:02 AM
 
Does this smell like spam to anyone else? First time poster with a HUGE post that's all about a particular application-even if it is at Sourceforge? <Finger hovering over the "delete thread" button...>
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 22, 2006, 11:39 AM
 
Call it what you like. The project is in dire need of developers, which is the main reason I posted it here.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 22, 2006, 12:25 PM
 
I agree with Ana. The claims of legality are garbage.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London'ish
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 22, 2006, 02:08 PM
 
I don't think its spam.. Altho it did cross my mind for a moment too.
Looks genuine to me. And viable.. However, surely if this system is sending considerable amounts of data back n forth to users that dont even need it, then adding that on top of the data you DO want is going to be ultimately very heavy on bandwidth.. Right?
Just my 2kbps worth
The worst thing about having a failing memory is..... no, it's gone.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:12 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2