 |
 |
Post your OpenMark score - OpenGL benchmark (pic)
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
OpenMark 1.60
OpenMark is an OpenGL benchmark for Mac OS X.
OpenMark tests the raw speed of the video card drawing a variable (automatic or user-defined) number of triangles and generates a screenshot and a text report of any step.
If you run the predefined benchmark, it generates an increasing number of triangles until the frame rate drops below 10 fps. Once it hits 9 fps, the bench stops, and you get a set score. This is the example on their web page:
My scores:
Cube G4 1.7 GHz with ATI Rage 128 Pro 16 MB 1360x768x32: 373
iMac C2D 2.33 with GeForce 7600GT 256 MB, 1920x1200x32: 13686 <--Schweet! 
(Last edited by Eug Wanker; Oct 17, 2006 at 11:56 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Cube G4 1.7 GHz with ATI Rage 128 Pro 16 MB 1360x768x32: 373
iMac C2D 2.33 with GeForce 7600GT 256 MB, 1920x1200x32: 13686 <--Schweet!
iMac G5 2.0 with Radeon 9600 128 MB, 1680x1050x32: 4147
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
PowerBook G4 1.0 GHz
ATI Radeon 9600 mobile 64 MB 1280 x 854
3742
|
|
MBP 2.4/160/2/256
iMac 2.0/250/1/128
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Offline
|
|
MacBook Pro 15" 2.16GHz, mobility X1600 256MB, 2GB RAM
8719
(Last edited by Cadaver; Oct 18, 2006 at 10:23 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mac Pro 2.66GHz, GeForce 7300GT 256MB, 2560x1600 pixels
8128
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cadaver 
MacBook Pro 15" 2.16GHz, mobility X1600 256MB, 2GB RAM
8719
Originally Posted by Cadaver
Mac Pro 2.66GHz, GeForce 7300GT 256MB, 2560x1600 pixels
8128
Hmm... Interesting. I note that the Mac Pro Quad 2.66 here is slower than the MBP CD 2.16.
It's been said that in Aperture, an iMac CD with X1600 is noticeably faster than a Mac Pro with 7300GT, and this test seems to reflect this. (I also have heard that the 24" iMac C2D with 7600GT is faster than the iMac CD with X1600 in Aperture. While I have not directly compared the two machines, I note that I got 13686 on my 7600GT iMac in this test.)
I'm not sure if the 2560x1600 screen rez on your Mac Pro makes a significant difference, but FWIW I get the exact same score with my G5 iMac whether I run the test with my screen rez set to 1680x1050 or if I run it with it set to 1024x768.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anson, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
MacBook 2.0GHz, 2GB DDR2 667, Intel GMA950 OpenGL Engine, 1280x800x32 - 720
PowerMac G4 DP 1.8GHz, 1.5GB PC133, Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB, 1280x1024x32 - 9331 (ran twice because it seemed too high, same result)
(Last edited by hookem2oo7; Oct 19, 2006 at 08:46 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by hookem2oo7
MacBook 2.0GHz, 2GB DDR2 667, Intel GMA950 OpenGL Engine, 1280x800x32 - 720
Ouch.
PowerMac G4 DP 1.8GHz, 1.5GB PC133, Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB, 1280x1024x32 - 9331 (ran twice because it seemed too high, same result)
Not that surprising, considering the Radeon 9800 is quite a fast GPU.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anson, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
yes, ouch is correct, but it seems to handle the small amount of gaming i do (Tiger Woods 2005, Medal of Honor) better than my ibook G4 (9550) did...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by hookem2oo7
yes, ouch is correct, but it seems to handle the small amount of gaming i do (Tiger Woods 2005, Medal of Honor) better than my ibook G4 (9550) did...
Yeah, it seems that not only is this OpenGL bench is a limited test of the GPU, judging by our results it doesn't test the CPU that much either. (The latter is a good thing though for a GPU test.)
OTOH, gaming relies very heavily on the CPU as well, and the G4 1.33 just doesn't cut it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: :ИOITAↃO⅃
Status:
Offline
|
|
MacBook Pro 2.0Ghz: 8719 (same as above)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
I also have heard that the 24" iMac C2D with 7600GT is faster than the iMac CD with X1600 in Aperture. While I have not directly compared the two machines, I note that I got 13686 on my 7600GT iMac in this test.)
My iMac C2D 2.16 GHz X1600: 13189 (which is only about 3% slower than yours)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Morpheus
My iMac C2D 2.16 GHz X1600: 13189 (which is only about 3% slower than yours)
Pretty good.
I wonder what the clock is for the the X1600 in the iMac Core 2 Duo (or even iMac Core Duo). I betcha it's faster (either GPU or memory, or both) than the MacBook Pro. (Both machines use GDDR3.)
Cube G4 1.7 with ATI Rage 128: 373
MacBook CD 2.0 with GMA 950: 720
PowerBook G4 1.0 with Radeon 9600: 3742
iMac G5 2.0 with Radeon 9600: 4147
Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT: 8128
MacBook Pro CD 2.0 with Radeon X1600: 8719
MacBook Pro CD 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 8719
Power Mac Dual G4 1.8 with Radeon 9800 Pro: 9331
iMac C2D 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 13189
iMac C2D 2.33 with GeForce 7600GT: 13686
(Last edited by Eug Wanker; Oct 21, 2006 at 10:36 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maine, USA, Earth
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nvidia has always been MUCH more openGL friendly than ATI. Makes me wonder why Apple uses ATI at all.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status:
Offline
|
|
iBook G4 1.33 with ATI Radeon 9550 32MB: 2765
G5 PowerMac Dual 2 gig with GeForce FX 5200 64MB: 1254 <----- Something seems wrong with that!
(Last edited by gradient; Oct 19, 2006 at 06:42 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by gradient
iBook G4 1.33 with ATI Radeon 9550 32MB: 2765
G5 PowerMac Dual 2 gig with GeForce FX 5200 64MB: 1254 <----- Something seems wrong with that!
Light green: GeForce FX 5200
Dark green: GeForce FX 5500 (5200 replacement, built on a smaller process)
Bright red: Radeon 9550
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
I win.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Anson, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
4867 on my little PowerBook 1.5 GHz.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Unsurprising the MacBook fairs poorly in this test. It's basically entirely vertex and lighting as far as I can tell, so the GPU isn't even being used.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
On my iMac 24" 2.16Ghz, 2GB with GeForce 7300GT = 7936
Ian
|
Computers - Au MacBook 2.4Ghz, iMac 24" 2.8Ghz Core 2 Duo
iPods - 5GB original iPod, 4GB nano - Red, 1GB 2G shuffle - Silver, 4GB 3G Shuffle - Black, 16GB touch, 16GB nano Red, 16GB iPhone 3G.
OSX User Since Public Beta, current OS 10.6.1, iTS UK purchases - 5377 songs.... and growing!
My website - www.idparkinson.co.uk
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
So, I'm not convinced the resolution that this app lists means anything for the benchmark. It seems that the app is changing the rez when it is running the benchmark anyway, although I don't know how to confirm what rez it's using. Furthermore, setting my G5 iMac's screen to 1680x1050 vs. 1024x768 doesn't make any difference in the score. (The results the test provides though aren't that fine grained. Two computers got 8719, and I don't think there's any way of getting 8720 or 8716 or whatever.)
Originally Posted by Parky
On my iMac 24" 2.16Ghz, 2GB with GeForce 7300GT = 7936
It seems to me that anyone getting a 24" for anything 3D related should definitely consider the 7600GT. Of course, the 7300GT is great for basic OS X 3D stuff and any apps that don't utilize the GPU much. ie. Adobe Creative Suite 2 will run great on the base 24", but for Motion and Aperture, the upgrade to the 7600GT is basically mandatory. It was an easy decision for me though, because for some reason the upgrade in Canada only costs CAD$90 (US$80). In the US it's US$125, or 56% more. Strange.
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
I win.
Yes, indeed.  Which model though?
Originally Posted by Chuckit
4867 on my little PowerBook 1.5 GHz.
Which GPU? Radeon 9700?
Originally Posted by Catfish_Man
Unsurprising the MacBook fairs poorly in this test. It's basically entirely vertex and lighting as far as I can tell, so the GPU isn't even being used.
Do you mean "CPU isn't even being used"? If so, I do note that the iMac C2D X1600 seems to do a lot better than the MBP CD X1600, but I wonder if most of that difference is due to the GPU's clock speed etc. though (assuming there is a difference).
Cube G4 1.7 with ATI Rage 128: 373
MacBook CD 2.0 with GMA 950: 720
PowerBook G4 1.0 with Radeon 9600: 3742
iMac G5 2.0 with Radeon 9600: 4147
PowerBook G4 1.5 with Radeon 9700?: 4867
iMac C2D 2.16 with GeForce 7300GT: 7936
Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT: 8128
MacBook Pro CD 2.0 with Radeon X1600: 8719
MacBook Pro CD 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 8719
Power Mac Dual G4 1.8 with Radeon 9800 Pro: 9331
iMac C2D 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 13189
iMac C2D 2.33 with GeForce 7600GT: 13686
Mac tower with Radeon X1900: 18874
(Last edited by Eug Wanker; Oct 21, 2006 at 10:36 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Do you mean "CPU isn't even being used"? If so, I do note that the iMac C2D X1600 seems to do a lot better than the MBP CD X1600, but I wonder if most of that difference is due to the GPU's clock speed etc. though (assuming there is a difference).
My comment referred specifically to the MacBook, which has no GPU transform and lighting capabilities.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
10179 - G5 Dp 2.0, 9800xt
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have a Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT. My result: 8323
|
|
To be determined later.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maine, USA, Earth
Status:
Offline
|
|
800mhz iMac G4 with Geforce 2mx: 1036
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Between heaven and hell
Status:
Offline
|
|
968 on a 1Ghz G4 Powerbook with a 64MB ATI card (don't know which one).
|
|
Yes, I know I could buy a PC, but why?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Which GPU? Radeon 9700?
Yeah. I didn't think there was any other GPU that you could get with a 1.5 GHz PowerBook.
Originally Posted by Anand
968 on a 1Ghz G4 Powerbook with a 64MB ATI card (don't know which one).
That could be either the Radeon 9000 or the Radeon 9600. You can find out which in the Graphics/Displays section of System Profiler.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Between heaven and hell
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Yeah. I didn't think there was any other GPU that you could get with a 1.5 GHz PowerBook.
That could be either the Radeon 9000 or the Radeon 9600. You can find out which in the Graphics/Displays section of System Profiler.
In the system profiler it just says ATY,RV250M9.
|
|
Yes, I know I could buy a PC, but why?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Cube G4 1.7 with ATI Rage 128: 373
MacBook CD 2.0 with GMA 950: 720
PowerBook G4 1.0 with Radeon 9000: 968
iMac G4 800 MHz with GeForce2 MX: 1036
PowerBook G4 1.0 with Radeon 9600: 3742
iMac G5 2.0 with Radeon 9600: 4147
PowerBook G4 1.5 with Radeon 9700: 4867
iMac C2D 2.16 with GeForce 7300GT: 7936
Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT: 8128
Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT: 8323
MacBook Pro CD 2.0 with Radeon X1600: 8719
MacBook Pro CD 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 8719
Power Mac Dual G4 1.8 with Radeon 9800 Pro: 9331
Power Mac Dual G5 2.0 with Radeon 9800 XT: 10179
iMac C2D 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 13189
iMac C2D 2.33 with GeForce 7600GT: 13686
Unknown Mac tower with Radeon X1900: 18874
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Yeah. I didn't think there was any other GPU that you could get with a 1.5 GHz PowerBook.
Radeon 9600, Radeon 9700, or GeForce FX 5200 depending on the model.
(Last edited by Eug Wanker; Oct 21, 2006 at 10:36 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Yes, indeed. Which model though?[/b]
Mac Pro 2.66, Radeon X1900 XT 512MB.
Looking at the score for the 7300 on the same computer I am glad I opted for the high-end card 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
TiBook 667 with ATI Radeon 7500: 373
|
|
"angels bleed from the tainted touch of my caress"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Why do you care?
Status:
Offline
|
|
2.16 GHZ MBP w/ 2 GB RAM : 11,751
|
|
27" 2.8 GHz Intel Core i7 iMac
13" Late-2010 MacBookAir
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
Mac Pro 2.66, Radeon X1900 XT 512MB.
Looking at the score for the 7300 on the same computer I am glad I opted for the high-end card
I'm going to wait until the next MacPro update and hope the high end is something other than an ATI card or specialized like the Quattro. I believe it should happen, being that ATI on Intel should not happen after this year.
|
|
To be determined later.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
PowerBook G4 667 with Radeon 7500: 373
Cube G4 1.7 with ATI Rage 128: 373
MacBook CD 2.0 with GMA 950: 720
PowerBook G4 1.0 with Radeon 9000: 968
iMac G4 800 MHz with GeForce2 MX: 1036
PowerBook G4 1.0 with Radeon 9600: 3742
iMac G5 2.0 with Radeon 9600: 4147
PowerBook G4 1.5 with Radeon 9700: 4867
iMac C2D 2.16 with GeForce 7300GT: 7936
Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT: 8128
Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT: 8323
MacBook Pro CD 2.0 with Radeon X1600: 8719
MacBook Pro CD 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 8719
Power Mac Dual G4 1.8 with Radeon 9800 Pro: 9331
Power Mac Dual G5 2.0 with Radeon 9800 XT: 10179
MacBook Pro CD 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 11751
iMac C2D 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 13189
iMac C2D 2.33 with GeForce 7600GT: 13686
Mac Pro 2.66 with Radeon X1900: 18874
I'm not sure why one MBP CD 2.16 gets 8719 and another gets 11751.
Originally Posted by Naaaaak
I'm going to wait until the next MacPro update and hope the high end is something other than an ATI card or specialized like the Quattro. I believe it should happen, being that ATI on Intel should not happen after this year.
What's wrong with an ATI card? The X1900 is damn fast.
(Last edited by Eug Wanker; Oct 21, 2006 at 10:45 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
What's wrong with an ATI card? The X1900 is damn fast.
It is, but it also has some problems with XP under BootCamp from what I have read (some games don't display everything properly). I also have reservations over driver support for the card since ATI is AMD-only soon.
|
|
To be determined later.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Naaaaak
I also have reservations over driver support for the card since ATI is AMD-only soon.
Your reasoning here doesn't really make sense. The ATI X1900 is already in Intel Macs, with good Mac drivers.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Your reasoning here doesn't really make sense. The ATI X1900 is already in Intel Macs, with good Mac drivers.
My main concern is how support will be a year from now. Will Apple / ATI care enough to release a driver update for the X1900 should little glitches pop up? Major issues will be dealt with I'm sure, but for small things I'd think Apple / Nvidia would be more inclined to do so in such a situation.
|
|
To be determined later.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
MacBook Pro 17" 2GB RAM 7,200RPM 100GB 2.16GHz Core Duo
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northern California
Status:
Offline
|
|
test started
FPS 2935.0 0 triangles
FPS 2465.0 1152 triangles
...
FPS 9.0 18580608 triangles
final score: 18874
test stopped
This is the tga file that it outputted
(Last edited by Apfhex; Oct 22, 2006 at 04:57 PM.
)
|
Mac OS X 10.5.0, Mac Pro 2.66GHz/2 GB RAM/X1900 XT, 23" ACD
esdesign
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
PowerBook G4 (look in my sig) 6382, It says my graphics card is a 9600 even though its a 9700, any ideas why? Overclocked GPU btw
|
|
iMac 24" | Core 2 Extreme 2.8GHz | 4GB RAM | 500GB HD
PowerBook G4 15" HR | 1.67GHz | 2GB RAM | 100GB HD
R.I.P 1995 Toyota Supra NA-T
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
iBook G4 800MHz, ATI Radeon 9200: Score 778
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Status:
Offline
|
|
hmm.... mine doesnt show the score in the windowed mode.... and when i run the benchmark my screen turns off 'cuz my monitor sucks...
-also-
when i take a screenshot while it is doing the benchmark, the screenshot goes blank.
i dont suppose it supports my video card (sig) i think mine is a ati rage pro something-or-other...
?:
i think that the FPS dipped a bit while taking the shot, because it is normally 130 FPS.
WTF?!?!?!?!! It doesnt tell me a score!!!!
(Last edited by kick52; Oct 30, 2006 at 04:02 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by gradient
iBook G4 1.33 with ATI Radeon 9550 32MB: 2765
I concur. The app calls the 9550 an ATi Radeon 9600 XT for some reason. Perhaps they are similar.
V
|
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator  Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
8520 on my MBP 2.0GHz, with 128MB Radeon X1600. I was amazed at how many triangles that thing produced! About 8.5 million!
|
|
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
PowerBook G4 667 with Radeon 7500: 373
Cube G4 1.7 with ATI Rage 128: 373
MacBook CD 2.0 with GMA 950: 720
iBook G4 800 with Radeon 9200: 778
PowerBook G4 1.0 with Radeon 9000: 968
iMac G4 800 with GeForce2 MX: 1036
iBook G4 1.33 with Radeon 9550: 2765
PowerBook G4 1.0 with Radeon 9600: 3742
iMac G5 2.0 with Radeon 9600: 4147
PowerBook G4 1.5 with Radeon 9700: 4867
Cube G4 1.7 with GeForce 6200: 6308
PowerBook G4 1.67 with OC Radeon 9700: 6382
iMac C2D 2.16 with GeForce 7300GT: 7936
Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT: 8128
Mac Pro 2.66 with GeForce 7300GT: 8323
MacBook Pro CD 2.0 with Radeon X1600: 8520
MacBook Pro CD 2.0 with Radeon X1600: 8719
MacBook Pro CD 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 8719
Power Mac Dual G4 1.8 with Radeon 9800 Pro: 9331
Power Mac Dual G5 2.0 with Radeon 9800 XT: 10179
MacBook Pro CD 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 11751
MacBook Pro CD 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 11751
iMac C2D 2.16 with Radeon X1600: 13189
iMac C2D 2.33 with GeForce 7600GT: 13686
Mac Pro 2.66 with Radeon X1900: 18874
I'm not sure why one MBP CD 2.16 gets 8719 and another gets 11751.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bristol
Status:
Offline
|
|
How long should this process take.....and what does scrolling the mouse button do?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Finland
Status:
Offline
|
|
WTF?!?!?!?!! It doesnt tell me a score!!!!
How long should this process take...
For those mystified by non-results: try starting the benchmark first. (Openmark -> Run Benchmark.)
eMac 1GHz (ATI Graphics), ATI Radeon 7500: 460.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bristol
Status:
Offline
|
|
For those mystified by non-results: try starting the benchmark first. (Openmark -> Run Benchmark.)
Thank you.
Just run on my brand new 20" iMac C2D 2.16, 2GB RAM and upgraded graphics card.
Score 13189
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
