 |
 |
Beach Ball of Hell using iDVD...
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
it is normal or something's wrong? I let the Mac on all night and when I woke up I am seeing this beach ball of Hell floating around for a while... some people said that is just normal and that I need to wait a couple of hours and thats it... any thought? any way it still in the background at the same time I'm writing this... 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is it spinning or just static? If it's not moving and you can use the application normally, it just means that whatever program you're in forgot to update the pointer state - that happens sometimes. If you switch to other applications you'll get the pointer back.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hey! it turns out that it did the work and eject the DVD finished! I thinks it is normal to see the beach ball of hell spining around in the middle of the process.. so thanx anyway! 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes unfortunately it is normal when encoding. I really wish apple would fix this (up the threading?) I cant even minimize the window. The iApps are becoming more an more windows like.....
|
|
Pismo 400 | Powerbook 1.5 GHz | MacPro 2.66/6GB/7300GT
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by tkmd
The iApps are becoming more an more windows like.....
Yeah.. I know what you mean, Steve Jobs' priority now is increase global sales and that means more money, and that is the same pattern that Bill Gates used. I miss the time when Apple was strong because of the quality of their products, today a Mac Pro it more like a PC with more power and not like a better Mac... can you feel me? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Windsor, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by I WAS the One
Yeah.. I know what you mean, Steve Jobs' priority now is increase global sales and that means more money, and that is the same pattern that Bill Gates used. I miss the time when Apple was strong because of the quality of their products, today a Mac Pro it more like a PC with more power and not like a better Mac... can you feel me?
i know what ya mean, thats why im glad i still have my 15" ppc powerbook, back when a mac was a MAC, feel me? lol 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I still wonder why nobody keep designing stuff for Mac OS 9, it was a solid OS though... I was reading iWoz, and Woz actually said that his son discover how to fix the crashing environment with simple steps that involve erasing all MSN apps from scratch. the bug was in because of that and his son Jesse was the one who figure it out! so, NEXT was a no no acording to Woz, and OS 9 would be the same as powerful as OS X without the need of Unix and will be a whole solid OS today. Anyway that's what the book says, and I'm just wondering why we don't start designing apps as solid as the iLife one for OS 9 and keep using old g3 and g4 machines with a classic environment just for the fun of it!? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Its not that OS 9 was better, it was just more easier to use. However, OS X is stable (OS 9 was not), had protected memory and system wide multiprocessing ability. Given this trade off I would choose OS x. However, the problem here is that the new applications written for OSX have more OS X flavor to them than the ones that where ported over from OS 9. Every new OS release steps away from classic mac os feel and closer to a windows like feel. For example it burns me up that new apps (backup 3.1 and other apps) quit the program when I close its window. What I want is Steve Jobs to hire Jeff Raskin back (Developer of the Human interface and the father of the classic mac os) to head up design for the mac os. But this is getting off topic from the OP. Sorry.
|
|
Pismo 400 | Powerbook 1.5 GHz | MacPro 2.66/6GB/7300GT
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by tkmd
Its not that OS 9 was better, it was just more easier to use. However, OS X is stable (OS 9 was not), had protected memory and system wide multiprocessing ability.
you said it yourself. More easy to use and it's true, I remember when something went wrong with my Mac, I'd just erase the extension, the control panel and the preference document and everything was normal again. Today it's not that easy. even with AppZapper you need to do a couple of things more to eliminate everything you don't want inside your Mac. OS 9 would be stable if Apple give Woz a chance according to him, to explain how to make it stable. and memory protected could be an OS 9 improvement also, remember the force quit comand? it was a far out feature that needed little work to be finished. Maybe the OS 10 today would be a better OS than OS X now. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|