 |
 |
OS X app that can open WriteNow docs?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi, is there any OS X word processor out there that would be able to open old WriteNow docs? Just trying to salvage all my really old stuff. Thanks.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Goteborg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Try Appleworks, I think it will do it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion, but AppleWorks didn't recognize my old WriteNow files. Which is fine with me, since I don't think AppleWorks would run on Intel anyway. Speaking of, I should probably add that as a requirement... "Is there any Universal Binary word processor that would be able to open old WriteNow docs?" Thanks.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Online
|
|
OS X for Intel-based Macs will run any PowerPC application. While it might not run as fast as it would on a PPC processor, it will work. Appleworks will run on your Intel-based Mac.
As far as salvaging - if you have access to a Mac that will run WriteNow and can get a hold of an appropriate version of Adobe Acrobat, you could print/export your files as PDFs.
|
|
Mac Pro 2.66GHz, 6GB RAM, GeForce 8800GT, Apple 30" Cinema
Black MacBook 2.2GHz, 4GB RAM
PowerMac G4 Cube 1.7GHz PPC7448, 1.5GB RAM, GeForce 6200, Apple 20" Cinema
iPhone, Apple TV, Time Capsule 1TB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Online
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Pro 2.66GHz, 6GB RAM, GeForce 8800GT, Apple 30" Cinema
Black MacBook 2.2GHz, 4GB RAM
PowerMac G4 Cube 1.7GHz PPC7448, 1.5GB RAM, GeForce 6200, Apple 20" Cinema
iPhone, Apple TV, Time Capsule 1TB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think the best thing to do with WriteNow files is probably to export them as RTF. As for MacLinkPlus, it took a real dive in its later classic incarnations. I didn't know it ever made the jump to OS X. However, back when it briefly shipped with the OS (OS 8 I believe), it was an incredible file translator.
|

PPC4Ever
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Goteborg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
I checked, and while Appleworks 5 supports Writenow (though XTND), Appleworks 6 does not. Appleworks 5 of course only works under Classic.
Well, I guess the best you can do now is to run Writenow inside an emulator and resave the files as something else. The upside is that Writenow was small and light enough to run on a 68k Mac, so an emulator like Basilisk or vMac will be enough to do it,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Indiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
How many files are we talking? I have WriteNow installed on an old PowerComputing clone. I'd be more than willing to do the conversion for you, as long as we're not talking umpteen hundreds.
FWIW, I loved WriteNow, back in the day.
|
Illustration/Design/Graphics
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for the offer, but I do have Classic running on my machine so I can still open my files in WriteNow. My issue is that when I get a new iMac very soon after Leopard's debut, I would like to open these documents in OS X. Based on what everyone has said, it looks like I have three options:
1) Export to RTF
2) Use MacLinkPlus
3) Open with Acrobat and save as PDF - it doesn't look like I have Acrobat in OS 9, but this method would generate read-only files anyway, so it's probably not that desireable
Which of these options do you think is best? Thanks.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Indiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you want to retain any editability, I'd say export to RTF.
|
Illustration/Design/Graphics
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Goteborg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Of course it depends on the complexity of the documents - how much you'd lose - but it seems like going to RTF is the best bet,
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for all the advice so far. So it appears I have over 600 WriteNow documents to convert to RTF. Is there a faster way of doing this other than opening each document, saving as RTF, and adding a .rtf extension to each document? Obviously, WriteNow ain't compatible with Automator! Thanks.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jszrules
Thanks for all the advice so far. So it appears I have over 600 WriteNow documents to convert to RTF. Is there a faster way of doing this other than opening each document, saving as RTF, and adding a .rtf extension to each document? Obviously, WriteNow ain't compatible with Automator! Thanks.
I read online that it shouldn't take too long to write an AppleScript that loops through a specified folder, opens WriteNows docs, and saves them as RTF. Since I have never written an AppleScript before, I do not trust myself, so I would really appreciate it if anyone can get me started... thanks.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Now that Classic is dead in Leopard, I bet a shareware author could really make a nice profit by providing a viewer/converter app for WriteNow files. I can't imagine the files would be too hard to translate.
|

PPC4Ever
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
A nice profit? Do you really suppose there are that many people out there that need to convert old WriteNow files? It sounds like the kind of thing that would get maybe 1 or 2 sales.
Also, to reverse-engineer the format, you'd need to have some way to make WriteNow files, and I'd guess old copies of WriteNow would be fairly hard to come by nowadays.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Indiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CharlesS
...I'd guess old copies of WriteNow would be fairly hard to come by nowadays.
Sell you mine! 
|
Illustration/Design/Graphics
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, it's not too hard to come by. It's such a tiny app, and it's abandon-ware, so. . .
|

PPC4Ever
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
Now that Classic is dead in Leopard, I bet a shareware author could really make a nice profit by providing a viewer/converter app for WriteNow files. I can't imagine the files would be too hard to translate.
MacLinkPlus, mentioned above, is such a program. I don't use it, but it does claim OS X compatibility.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Former child prodigy. Now I'm old."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Goteborg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Something that would be very cool would be a Quicklook plugin that uses the old XTND translators. That way you'd at least get the ability to read many old documents.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do the XTND translators have PowerPC / 68k / Classic code in them though? If so, such a thing wouldn't be feasible.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just a note for anyone else that needs to get at text within an old WriteNow document on OSX:
You can use Word 2008 to extract the text (don't know about earlier versions).
To do this from within Word:
1. Choose File menu > Open.
2. Select the file and click Open. Word will then present a small "Convert File" dialog.
3. Choose the intuitively named "Recover Text From Any File" and click OK.
4. Enjoy your gloriously extracted 1997-era text.
The above works on some simple text files I have. I haven't tried it on anything too complicated. Also, it leaves some post-conversion artifacts, but hey, it works.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|

PPC4Ever
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
| |