Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Applications > Burning DVD Movies

Burning DVD Movies
Thread Tools
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 09:49 PM
 
OK, it's the 21st century and it's about time I learned about how to burn DVD's! I had been using a pismo until late 2008 so my blackbook "superdrive" has some ahem, unique features.

I want to back up my movies onto dual layer DVD's, but have a couple quick questions.

1. Is DVD +R DL, or is DVD-R DL the standard for burning movies? Compatibility with most all DVD players is my main priority here.

2. Which brands of DVD R are most reliable?

Thanks!
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 18, 2009, 10:45 AM
 
To answer each of your questions:

1) DVD +R was generally made to be the more universally compatible, but generally -R will be as compatible with most machines. If you want to play it safe, go with the +R

2) I have a lot of filmmaker friends that swear by Memorex and Maxwell. Personally I have also used Verbatim for years as well and have never had a problem.

Cheers
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 18, 2009, 06:07 PM
 
1. -R works better out of the box/with normal settings, but your burning software lets you set booktype then use +R and set booktype to -ROM for better compatibility with set top players.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 18, 2009, 10:26 PM
 
I've read that DVD +R DL is the best option. I'm going to try some verbatim DVD+R DL's, as they seem to be getting good reviews:

Amazon.com: Verbatim 96542 8.5 GB 8X Dual-Layer DVD+R, 30-Disc Spindle: Electronics
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 19, 2009, 01:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by MacSupportLiam View Post
1) DVD +R was generally made to be the more universally compatible, but generally -R will be as compatible with most machines. If you want to play it safe, go with the +R
Uhhhh... no. DVD+R was released because one group of manufacturers got impatient that the DVD Forum (the standards body for DVD) was taking too long to make DVD-R, which came out later. In tests, DVD-R consistently has broader playback compatibility than DVD+R.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 19, 2009, 04:33 PM
 
DVD-R was first to market, although DVD+R may have been the first to release DL since they were generally ahead on features/performance.

The difference in compatibility is mostly just for very old players that were around after -R was planned but before +R was released.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 23, 2009, 10:14 PM
 
OK, I've got my discs. Now, how do I burn backups? I've looked at disk utility and it won't let me burn the entire folder onto a disc.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 24, 2009, 02:04 AM
 
Finder --> Help --> "burn DVD"
     
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Polwaristan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 24, 2009, 04:22 PM
 
Since this one has replies to it, I'm closing your other DVD burning thread and moving this one to Applications.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 25, 2009, 02:31 AM
 
Different focus! The other one was about copying videos.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Polwaristan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 25, 2009, 10:13 AM
 
We can make it all-inclusive then: backing up videos and burning to DVD.
If that doesn't work for the OP, then he can just create a more specific thread. As written it was very similar, even titled almost identically.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 25, 2009, 11:08 AM
 
It was also completely redundant, as the exact topic had been covered literally dozens of times and is well-documented in the forum search.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2