 |
 |
Which OS9 for Quark - 9.2 or 9.1 ?
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: mentalspace
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm about to install a bootable version of 9 on a separate partition on my 15" Ti 1 ghz
For Quark use what's the best way to go -- all the way to 9.2, or stop at 9.1.x
Seem to recall 9.2 is really a "classic layer" implementation of 9 and may/does not have all the functionality of 9.1.x such as some control panels, control strip, perhaps.
Any advice welcome,
Thanks
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
I use Quark 4.14 (whatever the latest 4.x version is) in OS 9.2.2 and have not experienced any problems. I'd say go for it--earlier versions of 9 had various bugs which may not affect Quark but will affect overall stability.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by dumkwestchun:
I'm about to install a bootable version of 9 on a separate partition on my 15" Ti 1 ghz
For Quark use what's the best way to go -- all the way to 9.2, or stop at 9.1.x
Seem to recall 9.2 is really a "classic layer" implementation of 9 and may/does not have all the functionality of 9.1.x such as some control panels, control strip, perhaps.
Any advice welcome,
Thanks
Doesn't matter, it sucks on either. Try the demo version of InDesign on OS X.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by art_director:
Doesn't matter, it sucks on either. Try the demo version of InDesign on OS X.
dear god don't make the (wo)man do that.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by godzookie2k:
dear god don't make the (wo)man do that.
i (crash) know (crash) why (crash) you (crash) say (crash) that (crash) but (crash) quark (crash) blows (crash) and (crash) they (crash) don't (crash) give (crash) a (crash) rip (crash) about (crash) their (crash) customers. time (crash) for (crash) them (crash) to (crash) go (crash) down. by the way, q v.5 crashes a lot.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by art_director:
i (crash) know (crash) why (crash) you (crash) say (crash) that (crash) but
heheeheh hey just cause SOMEONE wasted 800 bucks on a stupid upgrade despite all bad reviews is no need for that SOMEONE to be bitter. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by godzookie2k:
heheeheh hey just cause SOMEONE wasted 800 bucks on a stupid upgrade despite all bad reviews is no need for that SOMEONE to be bitter.
You're so right, I should have stayed with the pirated copy of Q v.4 I was using. Foolish me decided to go legit on all my software and look at what it got me: a shitty version of Q. Heck, I can't even use the friggin' installer CD in the drive on my Ti PowerBook.
Quark v.5 blows in every way, shape and form.
One of the printers I work with tells me they now *prefer* ID files over Q because they have fewer problems. Go figure.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
