Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Other Topics > Art & Graphic Design > Quark vs. InDesign

View Poll Results: So, which one are you using? What version?
Poll Options:
Quark 16 votes (29.63%)
InDesign 38 votes (70.37%)
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll
Quark vs. InDesign
Thread Tools
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2003, 10:39 AM
 
Let's take the gloves off, shall we?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2003, 12:11 AM
 
ha HA! THREE TO TWO BIZZAACHHHHH!

     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2003, 02:22 AM
 
3 vs 3 now!!
oh, check out the new mac addict magazine. indesign is the winner
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: the end of the world
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2003, 07:39 PM
 
Too bad I can't vote twice. I'd vote for both. Don't make me choose - I wanna use both, please. . I use QK for most work that needs to be done fast and efficiently, ID for table jobbies.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Honolulu, HI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2003, 08:22 PM
 
Both here as well, but neither is 100% perfect.
Quark and InDesign are tools. Some tools are better for different jobs.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2003, 06:07 PM
 
Indesign has it all - Quark can go to H*ll - I have every version and never use it anymore - Indesign for me!
Visit us on the web @ strangedogs.com for FREE SPEECH and Video Card Flashing.
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Alphaville
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 29, 2003, 12:27 PM
 
Compare Quark 6 and Indesign CS.

InDesign's the winner hands down.
Always on the run...
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: San Francisco, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2003, 12:18 AM
 
After much BS with Quark, and a new motherboard on my G4 PowerBook, I am finally using V6 on my Powerbook. I have used XPress since around 1985 and really enjoy it. I don't have any of the other problems some have posted here about, but that doesn't mean they are a company that's easy to deal with or even very agreeable.

2 G4 PowerBooks
1 FP iMac
1 B&W G3
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Near Antietam Creek
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2003, 08:52 AM
 
Voted by proxy for my GF: InDesign, by a nose.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Capitol City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 5, 2003, 03:05 AM
 
Looks like InDesign is making inroads. By the way, last version of InDesign and Quark 5, InDesign one also. And not by a little bit.

The only reason people still use Xpress is the same reason accountants still use MS as an OS. They can't afford to change workflow.

And from what I've heard InDesign doesn't handle huge catalogues and what not very well. Doh!
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 5, 2003, 12:29 PM
 
No choice for me, only got InDesign that works with Chinese well enough, while I can only opt for QuarkXPress 4.0 if I were to use Chinese, and under OS 9 environment....

so, hands down for InDesign
TiBook rulezz~~

TiBook 800/512/40/Combo Drive
TiBook Giga/512/60/SuperDrive
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 6, 2003, 10:39 AM
 
Where I work, we are using Quark 4.11! No desire to upgrade and the only trouble we have is the semi-rare file from a customer that hasn't been saved down. We have one license for 5 just for saving down, and don't have to use it.

I'm ready to try putting InDesign into our workflow this year, but we will always have our legacy files to deal with and no real need to convert them.

InDesign will make it for small designers more quickly what a place with many users and a workflow that was set up with Quark in mind.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 6, 2003, 11:37 AM
 
Originally posted by bluedog:
Where I work, we are using Quark 4.11! No desire to upgrade and the only trouble we have is the semi-rare file from a customer that hasn't been saved down. We have one license for 5 just for saving down, and don't have to use it.

I'm ready to try putting InDesign into our workflow this year, but we will always have our legacy files to deal with and no real need to convert them.

InDesign will make it for small designers more quickly what a place with many users and a workflow that was set up with Quark in mind.
yeah, i'm a freelancer and i have quark v.5. saving down is a pain in the arse because i forget on occasion, and as you might guess, that only happens when we're on a short fuse.

many of my clients are switching over to indesign so i'm getting ready to take the plunge. this poll surprises me, i didn't realize so many people had switched. perhaps indesign really is the quark killer.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey - -USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 14, 2003, 12:23 AM
 
While Indesign is kicking Quarks butt -- - remember that there is a lot of printers that will not take Indesign files. There are some great functions in Indesign but these are causing headaches in prepress departments at printing companies.

Where I work we take indesign files - -but we have to create some effects that are created in ID in other programs such as Photoshop.

The 2 things that cause problems tranparancy and opacity. These cause ID files to not rip correctly.

If you do like working ID - - find a printer that will take these files and will help you set up your file correctly so that there are no headaches down the road.

If you any questions on this feel free and contact me.
info@prepress-online.com
www.prepress-online.com
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 15, 2003, 10:03 AM
 
Originally posted by Prepress Online:
While Indesign is kicking Quarks butt -- - remember that there is a lot of printers that will not take Indesign files. There are some great functions in Indesign but these are causing headaches in prepress departments at printing companies.

Where I work we take indesign files - -but we have to create some effects that are created in ID in other programs such as Photoshop.

The 2 things that cause problems tranparancy and opacity. These cause ID files to not rip correctly.

If you do like working ID - - find a printer that will take these files and will help you set up your file correctly so that there are no headaches down the road.

If you any questions on this feel free and contact me.


there will always be glitches early on in the life of an application. in the case of quark there will be glitches until the company goes down in a big friggin' ball of flame.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 16, 2003, 11:31 PM
 
To be honest... I would have to say most REAL places are using Quark 4.1, Photoshop 4-5 and Illustrator 8.

All on OS 8-9
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 16, 2003, 11:33 PM
 
Adobe could kill Quark in less then a few years if they would offer InDesign for $100...
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ewing,New Jersey
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 17, 2003, 08:21 AM
 
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
To be honest... I would have to say most REAL places are using Quark 4.1, Photoshop 4-5 and Illustrator 8.

All on OS 8-9
I guess my shop is not "real" as we use InDesign 2. Photoshop6&7
Illustrator6,8,9&10 depending on what the customer send the files in.
BTW if Adobe sold ID for $100 Quark would be out of buissness in a month.
almaink
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 17, 2003, 09:37 AM
 
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
To be honest... I would have to say most REAL places are using Quark 4.1, Photoshop 4-5 and Illustrator 8.

All on OS 8-9

please define "REAL places".

advetising agencies, design shops, printers and large corporations (ie. target, best buy, etc.) in the midwest are using quark v.4, id 2, illustrator 10 and photoshop 7.

btw, when i say the midwest i'm primarily referring to minneapolis and chicago -- two of the country's largest advertising and design markets.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2003, 08:56 PM
 
I use FrameMaker.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: the end of the world
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2003, 09:32 PM
 
You ID2 proponents out there: how can I replace an in-use spot colour (PMS) in ID2 with another or at least change the colour reference? The "delete swatch" option is greyed out (I assume because its in-use.) Frustrating!
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: the end of the world
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2003, 09:35 PM
 


nevermind...

the colour came from an eps
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2009 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.4 © 2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2