Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Art & Graphic Design > Best format for archives?

Best format for archives?
Thread Tools
WSE
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: santa monica, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 15, 2001, 01:35 AM
 
I am going to scan some documents, then destroy the originals (save space, etc.) Any suggestions on which format I should use, sometime more likely to still be supported well into the future?? I was thinking of JPG or PICT.

THanks
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 15, 2001, 01:53 AM
 
jpg, pict, adobe has always been good about supporting old versions of .psd. whatever floats your boat. Personally, I use PSD. Just out of habit i guess.

nick

[ 10-15-2001: Message edited by: godzookie2k ]
     
533
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 15, 2001, 04:57 AM
 
Try PNG, it uses a lossless compression (contrary to JPG) method and is said to be the future web standard (?). PNG files seem to be about half the size of a PSD file. But a JPG saved with maximum quality is half the size of a PNG and its hard to tell the difference. So if it's not essential for your work that you archive the original data, JPG saves the most space on your harddisk (unless perhaps you do a backup with StuffIt or Retrospect).
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 15, 2001, 07:38 AM
 
Tiffs with LZW compression Have never caused me any problems.
Make sure you burn iso9660 cds if you think you will ever need to get at them on a pc.

The IBM/Mac byte order option when saving tiffs in photoshop has never been a problem either. I have sent both types of files through both systems numerous times.

The reason for Tiffs is that more graphics programs will import them directly without having to convert format.
Will Quark or InDesign import PNG?
Will Pict files import to windows graphics programs?
In most cases the answer is no, but I know tiffs have always and probably always will be supported.

The only reason to keep psd file is when you have layered artwork to archive, IMHO.
     
533
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 15, 2001, 09:24 AM
 
Great advice. I forgot about LZW, it seems that it compresses as good as JPG (or even better with the file I tested). And as you say, TIF is the industry standard for bitmap images. Btw, InDesign can import PNG, but I'm no graphics professional so I don't know the advantages/disadvantages of this type of file for the printing process, TIF ist surely the safer solution.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: York, PA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2001, 01:59 PM
 
I have always used TIFF or PSD to save archived images. Both are standard formats in graphic design and TIFF can be opened by almost any graphic software. PSD obviously requires Photoshop.

Frank
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2