Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

ambush · Oct 1, 2004, 11:13 PM

I have thought about axioms (ed.: values?!) of -l-i-f-e- (note; scratch that, replace with ideology).

Unity is better than selfishness.

Unity makes us stronger.

Unity LOGICALLY exists ONLY when people are equal.

If you make choices according to what the Unity thinks, you will help a greater number of people than you would have, if instead, you had made a choice that was only good for you or mostly for you. (Thinking for the others as EQUAL human beings.)

If you make the right choices by taking into account everyone's opinion, problems don't logically exist.

It is never physically impossible to always make the best choice.

Unity can physically be achieved. Unity is in fact perfection. Kind of like the nirvana. BUt I call it unity and it HAS in fact major differences.)

But. Yes the world is rational. But THERE'S ALWAYS place for religion.

There is no god because a God would logically break the Unity, as the unity is totally one. No differences.

See? I'm getting "mythos" here (instead of logos). I shows that I could treat religious people with more respect.

I have realised I'm creating my own ideology here. And the axioms are VALUES of my ideology.

I'll take a look at it tomorrow and see if it makes sense.

btw motorcycle diaries kicks. (themovie!)

TheBadgerHunter · Oct 1, 2004, 11:23 PM

I see you learned some new words. Didn't learn what they meant, or how to use them, but the fact you're not high is good enough for me.

So let me just unwrap this fruit-cake: Unity is unachievable without a single will binding it. There is no right choice. The only way is to create a single choice is by removing the choice from the "unit". Pretending equality does not equal unity. The only way to create unity is by destroying individuality, putting them below a single master.

Now that I think about it I am quite sure you're high.

ambush · Oct 1, 2004, 11:34 PM

Originally posted by TheBadgerHunter:
I see you learned some new words. Didn't learn what they meant, or how to use them, but the fact you're not high is good enough for me.

So let me just unwrap this fruit-cake: Unity is unachievable without a single will binding it. There is no right choice. The only way is to create a single choice is by removing the choice from the "unit". Pretending equality does not equal unity. The only way to create unity is by destroying individuality, putting them below a single master.

Now that I think about it I am quite sure you're high.

Yes unity does not currently exist. because unity NECESSARILY is the LAST state. buddhists call it nirvana (w/o the relations with Karma & stuff (or maybe yes??!?!)). I call it unity.

ManOfSteal · Oct 1, 2004, 11:36 PM

ambush · Oct 1, 2004, 11:36 PM

normally i'd spread out my truth.

but spreading out my truths isn't compatible with my ideology. we're not one unit yet. spreading the truth would mean killing people. And the fine line between sane and insane is that - would you kill to propagate the truth or would you not. I wouldn't. And the way I will, I'll be insane and that day isn't coming.

maybe unity comes with the death of everything (that must be it since when everything is dead (no movement) everything is the same. (that's IF there is randomness only, if there's no randomness, it could not be true). see randomness thread.

I won't say it to anyone, and just pretend I don't know it yet (like rickey just did here) and that my friends is calling living.

ambush · Oct 1, 2004, 11:46 PM

I just realised random and order are so antonyms that they create TWO exactly equally CORRECT visions of existence.

so the real question must be does randomness/order exist? Can they BOTH exist (prolly no).

Lancer409 · Oct 2, 2004, 02:07 AM

Originally posted by manofsteal:

ugly .. isuzu

Gankdawg · Oct 2, 2004, 05:27 AM

Put the pipe down and go outside.

CD Hanks · 10:42 AM

What in god's name is going on in this thread?

I don't mean to be a dick (because letting thought flow out is a great thing and all), but most of what you posted flat out doesn't make sense.

edit:

If you make the right choices by taking into account everyone's opinion, problems don't logically exist.

Get back to us once you've documented and thought through the opinions of six billion living human beings on this planet.

TheBadgerHunter · Oct 2, 2004, 10:27 AM

Here an axiom to live by: Don't smoke and post.

BlueSky · Oct 2, 2004, 10:57 AM

Psychonaut · Oct 2, 2004, 12:22 PM

A = A

MindFad · Oct 2, 2004, 01:07 PM

Originally posted by manofsteal:

Beat me to it.

maximus_gluteus · Oct 2, 2004, 01:15 PM

smile

Nicko · Oct 2, 2004, 01:17 PM

there is no spoon...

Cubeoid · Oct 2, 2004, 01:42 PM

This thread is like so 4:41am. Unity is Inity is One is I.

TheBadgerHunter · Oct 2, 2004, 02:16 PM

Originally posted by Nicko:
there is no spoon...

would you like my spoon?

Zimphire · Oct 2, 2004, 06:15 PM

Originally posted by TheBadgerHunter:
I see you learned some new words. Didn't learn what they meant, or how to use them, but the fact you're not high is good enough for me.

So let me just unwrap this fruit-cake: Unity is unachievable without a single will binding it. There is no right choice. The only way is to create a single choice is by removing the choice from the "unit". Pretending equality does not equal unity. The only way to create unity is by destroying individuality, putting them below a single master.

Now that I think about it I am quite sure you're high.

0Wn3d