 |
 |
Applause!!! An SD card that fits right into a USB slot!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Where Lysimachia mauritiana blooms
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: detroit,mi,usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
saw it on gizmodo.com a few weeks back. this is the promise of technology in action.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Paris, NY, Rome, etc
Status:
Offline
|
|
take that compact flash!!!
|
Adopt-A-Yankee
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Michigan, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Michigan, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by paully dub:
take that compact flash!!!
I do like SD size over CF, but CF is much faster than SD.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NYC*Crooklyn
Status:
Offline
|
|
too bad they are 3-4 years late to dominate their industry
sucka!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Kilbey:
I do like SD size over CF, but CF is much faster than SD.
Theoretical maximum:
SD = 12.5MB/sec
CF = 16MB/sec
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by waxcrash:
Theoretical maximum:
SD = 12.5MB/sec
CF = 16MB/sec
the new CF 3.0 spec that was announced at CES allows up to 66MB/sec. not backwards compatible, however (or, if it is, it probably runs at the current 16MB/sec maximum you quoted)
|
"I start fires!"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hyrule
Status:
Offline
|
|
Looks like the floppy is officially dead for REAL. I was hoping they'd hurry up and do something like this.
Late yes, but it doesn't matter. Every computer in the past 6 years has USB so yeah.
|
|
Aloha
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Semi Posting Retirement *ReJoice!*
Status:
Offline
|
|
this would rock. no more flash readers. no more usb cords to plug into a camera. no more camera's with usb 1. it wouldnt matter anymore.
i'm just worried about the durability of such a thing. the hinge looks fragile.
|
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: detroit,mi,usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Lancer409:
this would rock. no more flash readers. no more usb cords to plug into a camera. no more camera's with usb 1. it wouldnt matter anymore.
i'm just worried about the durability of such a thing. the hinge looks fragile.
ya. and the fact that its postage stamp sized and could be easily swallowed by a cat.
that damned thing is 25 times bigger than the first HD we had on our first PC.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: In bits and pieces on Cloud City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wow that is the best idea ever!
|
|
"Curse my metal body, I wasn't fast enough!"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
