Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Helpful advice or criminal act?

View Poll Results: Helpful advice or criminal act?
Poll Options:
Helpful advice; his friend was set on killing himself anyway 23 votes (92.00%)
Criminal act; he assisted by giving the advice 1 votes (4.00%)
Not sure 1 votes (4.00%)
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll
Helpful advice or criminal act?
Thread Tools
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2005, 11:09 AM
 
http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/03/04/news/friend.html

Helpful advice or criminal act in Connecticut?
By William Yardley The New York Times
Saturday, March 5, 2005

CORNWALL, Connecticut It seems no one in this tiny town believes a crime was committed on the morning last June when Huntington Williams cleaned a revolver and advised his old friend John Welles where to aim.

Welles, 66, was dying of cancer and, according to a police report, wanted to make sure he killed himself with one clean shot.

When he told Williams he was considering firing the gun through his mouth, toward his spine, Williams, 74, suggested aiming a little higher, more toward the center of his skull. Then, Williams told investigators later that day, he walked down the long driveway of Welles' remote and rambling old house and waited for his friend to pull the trigger.

He was about to say "God bless" when he heard a single shot. Williams called 911, the emergency number.

More than seven months after Welles committed suicide, a state prosecutor charged Williams with second-degree manslaughter, citing what state police investigators said Williams had told them about Welles' last day and a state law that specifically addresses assisted suicide. The felony charge could bring 10 years in prison.

Welles, a colorful and beloved local figure who never married, never held a steady job and walked barefoot in the summer, talked openly and unemotionally about killing himself if he became incapacitated. Yet while his suicide may not have been surprising, the arrest of Williams stunned many people in Cornwall, population 1,434, a cluster of villages in northwest Connecticut.

Friends and relatives of both men say that the role Williams played in Welles' final moments was a merciful one. They say a rich life ended in a moment of deep friendship and self-determination.

"I don't think it occurred to anybody that this was assisted suicide," said Barbara Bartlett, Welles' sister. "John stood all by himself. I don't see that as assisted suicide personally, and I don't think anyone in Cornwall does."

On Feb. 7, more than 70 people showed up to support Williams on his first court date. Many others have written letters supporting him. A state senator has urged legislation that would give judges the option to grant a special form of probation, and no prison term, in cases of assisted suicide.

"The Legislature, when confronted with these facts, I think, will change the law," said the senator, Andrew W. Roraback, a Republican whose district includes Cornwall.

In Cornwall, Welles and Williams were popular without seeking attention. People described each man as a kind of endangered Yankee ideal, self-reliant and self-effacing but also generous and warm.

Williams, who looks much younger than his age, is an emergency medical technician, known for helping people in need. He was at Welles' house the morning of the suicide as part of a round-the-clock rotation of friends caring for Welles after he checked himself out of a nursing home days before his death.

A widower whose wife died of cancer in 1994, Williams lives in a modest house on a ridge overlooking his wife's family's farm. He taught high school vocational agriculture classes when he was younger and for a while drove a taxi part-time. He joined the volunteer fire department at 70, and he is the town's civil preparedness coordinator.

He greeted a reporter one evening wearing a heavy outdoor work suit. He was polite, apologizing when he said he could not agree to an interview because of the charges he faced.

In the police report, he said: "This is what John wanted. I had a comfortable feeling that this was right for him, knowing the man."

Welles rarely saw doctors. By the time he was found to have prostate cancer last spring, it had spread to his spine, and he knew he would live only a few more weeks, his friends and family said. He refused treatment.

David Shepack, the state's attorney who is prosecuting the case against Williams, has been criticized for filing charges. He would not comment when asked whether he had reservations.

"The problem we have is when one reviews the statute," he said.

He referred to a state law that says someone can be charged with second-degree manslaughter if he or she "intentionally causes or aids another person, other than by force, duress or deception, to commit suicide." Footnotes to the statute say people can be "blameworthy" even if they act out of sympathy for "one inflicted with a painful and incurable disease."
Why is there always money for war, but none for education?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2005, 07:30 AM
 
Interesting. As he wasn't present when his friend shot himself I don't think the prosecution has a leg to stand on.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2005, 07:38 AM
 
Technically, it would seem as though a law has been broken. Whether Williams should be prosecuted for it, however, is certainly debatable. It seems as though even the DA doesn't want to do it.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 51st State of America (Dłn Eideann).
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2005, 07:42 AM
 
This case highlights the need for more discussion on assissted suicide.
Will you be voting in liars and murderers come May 5th? The US screwed up by voting in their very own little genocidal maniac. Will you? If Labour's own members are in disarray about the Iraq war, what does that tell you?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2005, 08:39 AM
 
He could have pointed him here: http://www.satanservice.org/coe/suicide/guide/

[Gunshot]… should be performed by highly skilled personnel using a firearm appropriate for the situation. …the firearm should be aimed so that the projectile enters the brain, causing instant unconsciousness.

Unconsciousness is instantaneous if the projectile destroys most of the brain.

It is aesthetically unpleasant.

To: alt.suicide.holiday
From: David Richards
Date: 15 Aug 1997 14:52:49 GMT
>where is the best place to aim to cause certain death?
>I have heard just below the chin or in the mouth with
>gun on an angle pointing to brain or the side of
>the head…

The intuitive answer is go for the eye socket, but just the thought is enough to make most people squirm.
Any bullet "on an angle" or aimed at "the side of the head" is more likely than not to bounce off.
>what kind of bullet is best?
A big, heavy, fast one? Stay away from 22 rimfire, the only .22 that has any chance of effectiveness is a .223… but IMHO, if you want to save money and insure "certain death," find a good (used) double barreled 10 gauge… Great if you only have to handle the recoil once and don't have to worry about having a big black and yellow bruise across your shoulder for the next week (voice of experience on that one).

Remember the NRA's gun-handling rules:
Three Fundamental Rules For Safe Gun Handling

Always keep the gun pointed in a safe direction.
Always keep your finger off the trigger until ready to shoot.
Always keep the gun unloaded until ready to use.
(Last edited by demograph68; Mar 6, 2005 at 09:11 AM. )
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2005, 10:29 AM
 
Just let the Jury decide. The prosecution can bring all the charges it wants.
I don't see any Jury convicting the man of manslaughter.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2005, 10:41 AM
 
From the news story, I'm not sure whether he expected his friend to actually kill himself or not. But in either case, Welles had the gun, had the intention, and did everything himself. Precedent in Michigan seems to be based on Jack Kevorkian's close to "hands on" approach to assisted suicide.

If I were on the jury, I'd have to say that Welles killed himself, and Williams simply did not stop him.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 51st State of America (Dłn Eideann).
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2005, 11:00 AM
 
It's quite interestng to see how the poll has gone.
Will you be voting in liars and murderers come May 5th? The US screwed up by voting in their very own little genocidal maniac. Will you? If Labour's own members are in disarray about the Iraq war, what does that tell you?
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2