 |
 |
What were they thinking!!
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Good question...
Status:
Offline
|
|
1986
January: Apple settles law suit against Jobs out of court. Jobs agrees not to hire any Apple employees for 6 months, and to always make computers that are more powerful than anything Apple has to offer...yes, you read right.
Source
I don't understand why any company would sign a deal like this. WTF was Apple management thinking at the time??
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am quite sure that was not part of the agreement.
Jobs, in RDF angry mode, tells Apple he will crush them with NeXt by producing better computers.
QED.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
A provision like that was indeed included in the settlement. Apple intended to preclude NeXT from their market - the personal computer space. They got him to promise that he would not enter the regular consumer market, and NeXT never did.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
A provision like that was indeed included in the settlement. Apple intended to preclude NeXT from their market - the personal computer space. They got him to promise that he would not enter the regular consumer market, and NeXT never did.
Wearwe winterwesting.

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
He had to price them above consumer level.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Where my body is
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dlefebvre
But who won in the end?
Microsoft.
*rimshot*
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Both sides eventually won. SJ won, of course - he engineered the reverse takeover of Apple. It's quite possible that we would not have Apple today if he had not come back.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Good question...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Zimphire
He had to price them above consumer level.
So at the time Apple only made consumer level products?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
^^^  Joke of the year.
Maybe this meant that Jobs had to make post-pro-machines.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|