[Cody Dawg]

Check it out:

The Lost Liberty Hotel

Seems that a contractor is going to use the new law that the Supreme Court has just passed, allowing people to seize homes and convert them to commercial properties if they are deemed for the betterment of a community, to "seize" Justice Souter's home - one of the justices that supported this law!

For Release Monday, June 27 to New Hampshire media
For Release Tuesday, June 28 to all other media

Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.

Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.

On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.

Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.

The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."

Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.

"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."

Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Institute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.

# # #

Logan Darrow Clements
Freestar Media, LLC

Phone 310-593-4843
logan@freestarmedia.com
http://www.freestarmedia.com

[Mastrap]

Excellent plan. Where do I sign up to invest?

[Cody Dawg]

I know! Isn't it GREAT?

I had to email some radio talk show hosts and Drudge.

It's great.

[Kevin]

Cody this has already been posted in the PL, in a thread YOU started.

[Millennium]

This guy is clearly a few notes short of a Gesualdo mass but, I can't help chuckling at this. I know he doesn't mean it as a joke, but the schadenfreude involved here is just unbelievable. Let the abuses of power fall onto the ones who made that abuse possible, and all that.

If I had the money to spend right now, I might even invest in this, but I doubt he'd take the quantity I could afford to do spend.

[Cody Dawg]

This guy is clearly a few notes short of a Gesualdo mass but, I can't help chuckling at this. I know he doesn't mean it as a joke, but the schadenfreude involved here is just unbelievable. Let the abuses of power fall onto the ones who made that abuse possible, and all that.

If I had the money to spend right now, I might even invest in this, but I doubt he'd take the quantity I could afford to do spend.

I think we should tell him to set up a Paypal account and let us all become $1-share co-owners.



He could raise a million like THAT (fingers snap). Everyone would donate a buck.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by Millennium

This guy is clearly a few notes short of a Gesualdo mass but, I can't help chuckling at this. I know he doesn't mean it as a joke, but the schadenfreude involved here is just unbelievable. Let the abuses of power fall onto the ones who made that abuse possible, and all that.

If I had the money to spend right now, I might even invest in this, but I doubt he'd take the quantity I could afford to do spend.

I like the "Just Desserts" name

[Cody Dawg]

Edit, edit, edit.

I wondered where this post had gone to!



I'm laughing so hard right now because I'm sure that people are saying, "Say WHAHHH?" to themselves.



Posting a new thread about Russell Crowe.

[Mastrap]

Originally Posted by Cody Dawg

I think we should tell him to set up a Paypal account and let us all become $1-share co-owners.



He could raise a million like THAT (fingers snap). Everyone would donate a buck.

Why don't you mail him and suggest that? It's a great idea.

[Cody Dawg]

I did, actually.

My suggestion is this: When he obtains possession of the house that he brick the driveway, courtyard, etc., and sell personalized bricks for $50 each. For $50 you get a brick with a name inscribed on it to help pave the new driveway.

They did that recently here where we live for a park.

[mitchell_pgh]

I LOVE the idea. I hope he feels what many others are going to feel when they are forced to move out of a perfectly good house in the name of eminent domain.

I would donate $1+ no problem.

[JoshuaZ]

He he he... it is funny. Though highly odd.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by Cody Dawg

Posting a new thread about Russell Crowe.

Why don't you just buy out NN and turn it into your personal blog?

[Cody Dawg]

Kevin/Zimph:

Maybe I will.



How much IS it?



Will you come and post there?

[andi*pandi]

I love the people of New Hampshire.

[dreilly1]

Originally Posted by KevinK

Why don't you just buy out NN and turn it into your personal blog?

Or better yet, get the government to seize it on Cody's behalf.

Seriously, though, why are you all getting so upset at Cody? if you don't like the threads she starts, don't read them.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by Cody Dawg

Kevin/Zimph:

Maybe I will.



How much IS it?



Will you come and post there?

Do you already have web space?

You probably do.

[Albert Pujols]

Originally Posted by andi*pandi

I love the people of New Hampshire.

You obviously have never been to New Hampshire.

[Cadaver]

I really hope this actually gets somewhere.
What the hell was the supreme court thinking, anyway?

[nonhuman]

Pledge to spend a week there.

[CreepingDeth]

Oh how I love the irony.

[dav]

"if you build it, they will come"

[Zimphire]

Originally Posted by nonhuman

Pledge to spend a week there.

I would but...

People who signed this pledge also pledged to...

host a World Fark Party at the Liberty Lost Hotel
refuse to register for an ID card and will donate £10 to a legal defence fund

No thanks.

[SVass]

I want to point out that each state can have its own more restrictive definition:

Section I, Article 16 of the Washington State Constitution reads in part, ``Private property shall not be taken for private use, except for private ways of necessity, and for drains, flumes, or ditches on or across the lands of others for agricultural, domestic, or sanitary purposes.''

sam

[Zimphire]

"except for private ways of necessity"

Who deems what it necessary?

[Mastrap]

Originally Posted by Zimphire

I would but...

[/b]

No thanks.

Since when does UK legislation affect you in any way?

[alligator]

I'd stay there. I think the supreme court hosed this decision. It's bad public policy.

[Kevin]

Originally Posted by Mastrap

Since when does UK legislation affect you in any way?

I was talking about the Fark stuff.

Originally Posted by alligator

I'd stay there. I think the supreme court hosed this decision. It's bad public policy.

Wouldn't blame all of the supreme court on this.

Some didn't vote for it.

[Superman]

Just the ones with a history of leaning to the left who still think the Constitution is a living, breathing document.