Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Check this shiz out (homemade bullet time)

Check this shiz out (homemade bullet time)
Thread Tools
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 2, 2005, 09:00 PM
 
This is mighty cool. Homemade bullet time unit made from mac minis click here
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Outfield - #24
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 2, 2005, 09:02 PM
 
I bet sales are through the roof.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the South
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 2, 2005, 09:06 PM
 
not baaaad.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 2, 2005, 10:45 PM
 
neato.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2005, 12:11 AM
 
I don't get it. Why are the multiple minis needed? And how is this cheap?
"Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -Archimedes
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2005, 12:19 AM
 
for a broadcast environment, renting a setup like that for a day, probably isn't a big deal. however, it does seem like it could be much cheaper if they adapted the software to allow one (or a few) minis to control all of the cameras, rather than a mini per camera.

"I start fires!"
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2005, 02:00 PM
 
Interesting... but seems a little... CRAZY EXPENSIVE...

     
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Capital of the World
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2005, 02:46 PM
 
Looks neat, but you'd need like 4 of them inorder to do a complete 360, if that's even possible.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2005, 03:11 PM
 
Originally Posted by PacHead
Looks neat, but you'd need like 4 of them inorder to do a complete 360, if that's even possible.
the most he shows on there is 45 degrees, so you'd need eight of them to do a complete 360. i assume it's possible, but if the cameras are level with the subject, you'd end up seeing the other cameras in the pictures.

"I start fires!"
     
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Capital of the World
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2005, 03:15 PM
 
Originally Posted by MaxPower2k3
i assume it's possible, but if the cameras are level with the subject, you'd end up seeing the other cameras in the pictures.
Yeah, that makes sense, but how do other people do it then ? Do they just have the cameras not level with the subjects ?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2004
Location: on 650 cc's
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2005, 03:25 PM
 
Neat, like the technique they used for the Matrix. They came up with it first I think.

The cameras for the 360 scene in the Matrix were indeed not level, but they were set up on a green screen background. There is some info about it on the official site, but I can't seem to find it right now. They have an animated gif showing how the first shot looked like. You can see all the cameras, so my guess would they digitally removed them after.

edit : there are some movies on the site, under the matrix, on set pictures, bullet-time 1999, I took a screen shot, but you can see a lot more in the movies :

(Last edited by d.fine; Jul 3, 2005 at 03:35 PM. )

stuffing feathers up your b*tt doesn't make you a chicken.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 3, 2005, 04:19 PM
 
That is really cool.

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2005, 01:46 AM
 
Originally Posted by MallyMal
This is mighty cool. Homemade bullet time unit made from mac minis
That's hardly "homemade". It's a professional company, using the same method as pioneered in the Matrix.

Call me crazy, but the average home videographer doesn't have dozens of digital SLR cameras on elaborate stands, computer controlled with several levels of networking, and by necessity running custom software.

Impressive? Yes. Revolutionary (no pun intended)? Not even a tiny bit.

tooki
     
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Land of the Easily Amused
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2005, 01:56 AM
 
it'd be much more impressive had he used only one computer, and rigged one camera on a track to take those shots. sure, there'd be motion, but it's still be a terrific effect.

even cheaper - using cheapo digital cameras instead of DSLRs. but, like tooki said; this guy is a professional. someone could pull this off way cheaper and just take longer to put it together.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2005, 02:15 AM
 
I'd rather see it done with one mini, and 64 disposable cameras rigged with manual switches...

Now that would be cool.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Somewhere
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2005, 03:34 AM
 
One camera on a track doesn't really work, because each camera has to fire at the exact same time in order to capture a single instant like that. Otherwise, you're not really creating the same effect. Moving the camera during a scene isn't exactly a new idea.

The DSLRs are important because it's usually impossible to set all of the required parameters manually on a cheaper camera. The chances of all of the cameras to automatically set their aperture, shutter speed, white balance, et cetera close enough to each other for the result to be decent are pretty small. Some cheaper cameras *do* allow for manual settings, but probably not over the USB, so you'd have to get out your light meter beforehand and set all of the individual cameras manually. Once again, not good for capturing action.

What might work is an array of iSights. The iSight allows for pretty good manual control from the computer, though the resolution isn't great.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2005, 04:21 PM
 
Originally Posted by d.fine
Neat, like the technique they used for the Matrix. They came up with it first I think.
Not quite. This guy did almost a decade earlier. Time Slice Films
Sizzling like an isotope.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2005, 04:49 PM
 
Does each camera really have to be connected to a Mac mini, though? I mean... can't they just use the cameras' internal memory? Or do the minis somehow coordinate them too?

"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2005, 02:28 AM
 
They do it this way to provide realtime feedback.
Sizzling like an isotope.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2