Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Space Shuttle launch in two days

Space Shuttle launch in two days
Thread Tools
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 11, 2005, 11:41 PM
 
Anyone coming over. If so come early. 300k to 500k people expected.
So pack a lunch and be patient.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Outfield - #24
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 12:20 AM
 
I'll be watching it from my couch.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 08:46 AM
 
Watching from the comfort of the couch is boss, but this show needs to be seen live. And of course you have to come to Florida. Come on down and watch the launch and then run from the next hurricane coming (due this weekend).

Unfortunately the public can't get as close as in the past. Once we appease the C.A.I.B. folks maybe we'll start launching at night again. That you have to see in person, instant sunrise.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 10:43 AM
 
I'm not sure if I will watch the launch not not. I pray that the mission will be successful.

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hyrule
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 10:48 AM
 
I'll be watching.

Here's to hoping they don't need those air mattress patches
Aloha
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Colorado Springs
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 11:33 AM
 
First shuttle launch in 2.5 years? Opportunity for the terrorists to get a lot of attention here.

Sorry, I'm pessimistic about most things.
RhythmScore
iMac 27" Quad i5 | PMG4 2x867 (RhythmScore test server) | iPhone4
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Binghamton, New York, USA
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 06:26 PM
 
I'm not as worried about terrorists as I am about quality control..... link I mean WTF?
2.3Ghz 17" SandyBridge MBP 8GB RAM 7.2k 750GB HD anti-glare display|Dell 2408WFP|64GB iPad2 ATT 3G
     
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 06:47 PM
 

It was not immediately clear why the cover - which was held by tape - came loose.
If they call me, I might have an idea why it came loose. I mean, TAPE? One single screw/clamp would be better than tape.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 07:27 PM
 
Ok. That space shuttle is not launching tomorrow. At least not in my watch.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hyrule
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 07:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by AKcrab


If they call me, I might have an idea why it came loose. I mean, TAPE? One single screw/clamp would be better than tape.
GIT-R-DONE!

http://www.octanecreative.com/ductta...ges/carcam.jpg
Aloha
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 07:45 PM
 
Originally Posted by AKcrab


If they call me, I might have an idea why it came loose. I mean, TAPE? One single screw/clamp would be better than tape.
screws or clamps need to be affixed to the orbiter somehow, too. Unless you actually punch a hole in the skin for a bolt to affix a stupid windscreen protector that is REMOVED prior to launch...tape is the best solution.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 07:50 PM
 
Originally Posted by analogika
screws or clamps need to be affixed to the orbiter somehow, too. Unless you actually punch a hole in the skin for a bolt to affix a stupid windscreen protector that is REMOVED prior to launch...tape is the best solution.
Very interesting. The best solution fell off.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 12, 2005, 11:43 PM
 
The great damage was cause by a soft window cover. Yes it was secured by a piece of tape. It fell about 60 feet. The damaged component was replaced within a hour. But the press jump on us and ...... I'll leave it their. They beat us up all the time.

So Tile Technicians kicked butt and fixed the problem. End of story.

Oh the hard window covers are held in place with screws.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Binghamton, New York, USA
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Jul 13, 2005, 08:19 PM
 
Originally Posted by Gator Lager
The great damage was cause by a soft window cover. Yes it was secured by a piece of tape. It fell about 60 feet. The damaged component was replaced within a hour. But the press jump on us and ...... I'll leave it their. They beat us up all the time.

So Tile Technicians kicked butt and fixed the problem. End of story.

Oh the hard window covers are held in place with screws.

Do I have to say quality control again?
2.3Ghz 17" SandyBridge MBP 8GB RAM 7.2k 750GB HD anti-glare display|Dell 2408WFP|64GB iPad2 ATT 3G
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 13, 2005, 09:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by davidflas
Do I have to say quality control again?

Yes we do have Quality Control.
The black box in question has components straight out of the 70's. We ain't talking IC's
here. We're talking Transistors and diodes. The problem is that the birds are tested on the ground numerous times before they go to the pad(s). After 20 plus years of testing, things are going to fail.

The reason we still use old Tech is because a design change costs major bucks. And before any thing gets near the orbiter it has to be ran through the Q.C. gamut of tests. For instance the computers on the I.S.S. (space station) uses Intel 486 Chips. It took them that long to validate the chip. So trust me Sir, nothing gets near the orbiter that hasn't been tested till failure and proved. Sorry I'm thinned skin at the moment. And you're entitled to you opinion. Just please don't base it entirely on what the press writes about us. N.A.S.A. bends over backwards for the press. ? and they make us out to be incompetent idiots. Go figure
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Binghamton, New York, USA
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Jul 14, 2005, 06:56 AM
 
I guess my final thoughts on space shuttle quality control are as follows:

Rick D. Husband, William C. McCool, Michael P. Anderson, David M. Brown, Kalpana Chawla, Laurel Blair Salton Clark, IIan Ramon, Ellison S. Onizuka, Sharon Crista McAuliffe, Greg Jarvis, Judy Resnik, Michael J. Smith, Dick Scobee, and Ron McNair.
2.3Ghz 17" SandyBridge MBP 8GB RAM 7.2k 750GB HD anti-glare display|Dell 2408WFP|64GB iPad2 ATT 3G
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2005, 09:03 AM
 
You can watch the launch via the internet here:

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2