 |
 |
Anyone used a Biometric door lock?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
(Last edited by Uncle Skeleton; Jul 22, 2005 at 12:21 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Half... half... half... half...
Wow, you really want that door lock.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Minnesota
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've wanted one too, but I've heard bad things about a few of them. I'm not sure which ones are bad though - I guess I'm holding off because I'd like them to prove themselves first. Get one with a roller print reader, not one with a fingerprint pad. The pad ones can sometimes be faked with a gummy bear and residual oil on the pad.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Outfield - #24
Status:
Offline
|
|
I always leave my door open for security reasons.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Double-take. Right. In case anyone wants to get out right?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Across the river from Trump Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
why not just get a number lock with a 5 digit code?
I will stick to my keys and having a doorman downstairs though. Biometric doesn't look reliable at this stage and at those price points. I am sure a good one would run you thousands. Not worth the cost.
|
Barack Obama: Four more years of the Carter Presidency
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ManOfSteal
I always leave my door open for security reasons.
Elaine: Your...door was open
Crazy Joe Davola: I like to encourage intruders
Get one with a roller print reader, not one with a fingerprint pad. The pad ones can sometimes be faked with a gummy bear and residual oil on the pad.
Really? Cause I thought that gummi bear story was about lifting someone's print from somewhere else and then using gelatin (what gummi bears are made from, not actual gummi bears) to mold a copy onto a fake finger, then use that. I figure if someone is going to target me from their bat cave they can just as easily break a window. Plus I can keep a wet nap dispensor near the reader, if the danger is really the way you describe it. Anyway, got a link?
I really wish my condo allowed pets...big mean ones with teeth and something to prove....
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Captain Obvious
why not just get a number lock with a 5 digit code?
I would if it was a house, but in the condo they require the manager to be able to open it in case of emergency, and I'm not having some old person writing down my code all over the place just so they can remember it, then anyone who comes to visit them can see it and copy it without anyone knowing it was leaked... at least with a key you usually know when it's been compromised.
Some of the units do have the option to require both a print and a code. I can't remember which ones though.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Half... half... half... half...
Wow, you really want that door lock.
One of my ongoing projects is to establish the word "half" as a replacement for "partly," which I don't care for. I encourage everyone to join me. Also it's from another seinfeld episode (but I'm not a seinfeld fanatic, I'm really not)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thumbprints can be faked, i used to have a  with a fingerprint scanner.
It worked well, but you can copy prints with rubber cement.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'll do it if everyone will do it, but only expect a half-hearted effort... 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I wouldn't mind a keypad... but the thumb thing is dumb.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by budster101
breath scanner
One that won't let you in if you're too drunk, or not drunk enough?
If they make a lip scanner like the one Zapp Brannigan has to kiss to activate, I'll get one of those.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mitchell_pgh
I wouldn't mind a keypad... but the thumb thing is dumb.
Is that assessment based on security, fashion or convenience?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
It worked well, but you can copy prints with rubber cement.
Care to elaborate? Copy them off your finger, or off the device, or off anything you touch?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ
OVERKILL. Seriously.
Thanks for your input, but the same is often said about buying a Mac, when you could get a "good enough" PC for a third of the price. But somehow, we all went with the mac... it is a puzzlement.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've always been one to say that while I love high tech stuff, technology is to make your life easier. Sometimes you can make something too high tech. Overkill. if you can make something much easier by going low tech, why not.
Such as the power seat adjustment in my parents new car. Its slow, and I can't wait for the little motors to go out. The few times I've driven it I keep thinking how my 1988 Honda can change its seat to any position in 2 seconds thanks to a couple of leavers and the power of my legs.
Thats the point I was getting at.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
So how would this be harder than keys? (I hate carrying keys around. also I believe my current lock has already been picked after only living here 2 months)
And if you're referring to keypads, how do you suggest I prevent my code from getting out, given that I have to have the condo manager know it, and she's sure as heck not going to commit it to memory?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nothing is thief proof. if someone really wants in your place, they can always kick down the door.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
But that doesn't mean I have to leave the proverbial keys in the lock. And the question remains, what about this option is harder than keys? Basically, what does your analogy suggest I do instead?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Really, do what ever makes you feel safe. Thats what really matters in the long run.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ
Nothing is thief proof. if someone really wants in your place, they can always kick down the door.
Josh is exactly right. You can have the best lock in the world on your door, but if your door frame consists of weak, worn wood, that expensive lock can be as ineffective as a piece of tape.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: /OV DRK 142006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've always thought it would be really cool to make your own lock that maybe can't even be seen from outside the door. There was a MacGuyver episode where a bunch of college geniuses had a competition where they competed to pick each other's locks quicker. Maybe you could use a garage door opener connected to a motor, or a keyless entry system adapted from cars, or a magnet that would lift a cotter pin out of a deadbolt so you could slide it. You could give your apt. manager the extra remote or show him how to do the magnet.
Besides, building a one of a kind like that would surely satisfy your inner geek more as well as being safer than a commercially available product that thieves know how to bypass.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
doors like the ones in star trek next generation would be nice. two half doors fully recessed into the door jam while making the airlock sound would be phenomenal. if the door is forced open, a force field would be erected.
|

Liberty - Free Markets - Peace
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by iLikebeer
I've always thought it would be really cool to make your own lock that maybe can't even be seen from outside the door.... a keyless entry system adapted from cars, or a magnet that would lift a cotter pin out of a deadbolt so you could slide it. You could give your apt. manager the extra remote or show him how to do the magnet.
This is interesting, but I can't think of a way to make it more than simple security-by-obscurity. I think it would still require a (hidden) keypad or other sensor, and I can't think of a good way to hide it. Also, one of the main selling points for me is the keyless part, and that excludes having a remote to carry around and remember, plus I'm not too keen on the security of remote, couldn't they be cracked pretty quickly with an RF blaster or whatever they're called? Anyway, I'm targetting keycode/fingerprint so you can't get locked out, so if you have a good method for stealthifying one of those it would be most welcome.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ok so I went ahead and bought the one from my 3rd link, after confirming with sales that the 30 day return option was legit, and after about 15 minutes with it it became clear to me that the deadbolt is not designed to be locked from the outside. You can UNlock it from the outside with your fingerprint (the mechanism is such that when unlocked the handle opens both latch and deadbolt, and when locked it won't turn), and you can lock or unlock from the inside, but that's it.
So my curiosity is killing me: who would ever want a deadbolt but only want it locked when they are on the inside?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
So my curiosity is killing me: who would ever want a deadbolt but only want it locked when they are on the inside?
turn it around
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|