Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > iPod Nano - Let the whining begin

iPod Nano - Let the whining begin
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vladivostok.ru
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 06:17 PM
 
WTF!! Soldered-in battery? WTF??
_,.
a solitary firefly flies at nite
into the darkness an endless flight
a million flashes of delight.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 06:20 PM
 
I think they got it covered in the proper forum.
"That's okay, I'd like to keep it on manual control for a while."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NYC*Crooklyn
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 07:02 PM
 
actually, just looked for 5 minutes and i can't find anything

so how do we change the battery or whatever? bring it or mail it to apple or a apple store?


i suspect the batteries must last awhile before they wear out because the last battery hoopla was quite bad for apple.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 07:18 PM
 
yeah I apparently am missing the battery thread too. The battery soldered in battery makes me weary. Apple should be forced to replace batteries in these for the cost of the battery alone, and shipping, at max. Forcing people to buy new batteries that they solder in seems like prime target for a class action lawsuit.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 08:13 PM
 
What's so bad about soldered batteries? It should be a simple task to heat the old solder to let it loose, and they'll have a battery exchange program anyway.
Baits and Club
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 08:27 PM
 
Lots of gadgets use soldered-in batteries. It's not a big deal for a halfway-experienced hobbyist or computer shop to do. If it's just 2 or 3 solder joints, I could do it in around 5 minutes.

You have to remember: no iPod is designed to be opened by the user. What's inside should, therefore, be of relatively little concern. No way is Apple gonna worry about how hard it is to disconnect the battery on a device that is sold as a "closed box".

Sheesh...

tooki
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 08:37 PM
 
Give it up guys. You can bet within 10 days there will be ads for companies who will replace your nano battery to double the life at half the cost.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 08:40 PM
 
Hehe, class action lawsuit...
Baits and Club
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 08:42 PM
 
This doesn't look like a hard job.

     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 08:45 PM
 
Apple will be out of business by this time tomorrow.â„¢
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 08:46 PM
 
yeah, but a class action lawsuit would be better!
Baits and Club
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:02 PM
 
Originally Posted by meelk
Forcing people to buy new batteries that they solder in seems like prime target for a class action lawsuit.

Especially as Apple is forcing you to purchase a nano. Right now.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:02 PM
 
Originally Posted by rickey939
Apple will be out of business by this time tomorrow.â„¢
And the G5 Powerbook will be released the day afterwards.©
It's the devil's way now.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:15 PM
 
Originally Posted by Mastrap
Especially as Apple is forcing you to purchase a nano. Right now.
You act as tho the whole closed case thing isnt a damn scam, and you know well it is.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:16 PM
 
ipodresq.com is offering their services right now...
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NYC*Crooklyn
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:18 PM
 
ok, i'm not too concerned i suppose. i changed my 1st gen iPod but if i bought a 3rd or 4th gen, i'd bring it to the the store just like i would this nano.

i just hope it will cost around 50 or less and i'll be cool. i expect the battery will last me 2 years (based on my original iPod).
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:19 PM
 
Let's make a petition! Damn this forceful battery purchase!
Baits and Club
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:29 PM
 
Originally Posted by dampeoples
Let's make a petition! Damn this forceful battery purchase!
Yeah!!!

Where are our options to buy an iPod without a battery? Huh, huh?

Damn Apple for not giving us the choices we want.

</sarcasm>

One should never stop striving for clarity of thought and precision of expression.
I would prefer my humanity sullied with the tarnish of science rather than the gloss of religion.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:38 PM
 
<sigh> The nano's great, but yeah--it'd be even greater with a small, sleek removable battery like the PSP or most cell phones have.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:40 PM
 
Originally Posted by bradoesch
This doesn't look like a hard job.

Nope. No problem at all. With a good 60W iron, a clean desoldering vacuum and a few minutes, that thing's history. Piece of cake.

We all realize that the battery is soldered in so that the whole device can be smaller and weigh less, don't we? Just like why they didn't put in the extra chip that would make the Nano work with Firewire? No Big Deal. Really.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:49 PM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter
Nope. No problem at all. With a good 60W iron, a clean desoldering vacuum and a few minutes, that thing's history. Piece of cake.

We all realize that the battery is soldered in so that the whole device can be smaller and weigh less, don't we? Just like why they didn't put in the extra chip that would make the Nano work with Firewire? No Big Deal. Really.
Honest question: how does soldering it in save weight? How heavy is it to put in some copper connectors to a removable battery?

I'm not an engineer, so maybe there's something I'm missing here.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:50 PM
 
Because it works better.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 09:57 PM
 
Because you would have to have a removable door with some sort of a latch, extra connections from those to the circuit board, the connections, and a battery that's in a housing, to name a few. The entire product woudl be at least 1/4" thicker.
Baits and Club
     
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:05 PM
 
Yeah. because it works better.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:06 PM
 
Originally Posted by strictlyplaid
<sigh> The nano's great, but yeah--it'd be even greater with a small, sleek removable battery like the PSP or most cell phones have.
This is *exactly* the point that these idiots who just crawl up Apple's ass and sniff roses instead of crap are missing.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bellevue, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:06 PM
 
So far, I didn't find any problem yet.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:15 PM
 
I dig the nano just as it is and would not change a thing. Have you even used one? It's freaking awesome... and all you have to do is velcro it to the back of your phone and now you have an iTunes Phone iPod...
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:18 PM
 
Originally Posted by budster101
Because it works better.
Thx.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:20 PM
 
sure.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:21 PM
 
Originally Posted by dampeoples
Because you would have to have a removable door with some sort of a latch, extra connections from those to the circuit board, the connections, and a battery that's in a housing, to name a few. The entire product woudl be at least 1/4" thicker.
Hm, I don't like the removable door thing, but some cell phones have batteries that are literally one-piece deals where the back of it is the back of the phone. So you could save the door pieces, etc. and have the appearance of a sleek one-piece unit. Not sure how much smaller the internal wiring can be thanks to the soldering, but I imagine all you'd have to do is solder the wires to copper connectors rather than to the battery terminals.

Anyone know how the RAZR does it? Does that have a removable battery?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Across the river from Trump Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by bradoesch
This doesn't look like a hard job.

Hate to break it to you but most people out there don't have soldering irons. Just because there is an unbelievably high geek quotient in the forum doesn't mean that what would be routine for you would be a normal repair for most people. I know of very few people who spent their weekend nights working on their soldering skills.

It may be a more marketable skill now that the nano has been introduced, maybe it will help you meet chicks.

Barack Obama: Four more years of the Carter Presidency
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:30 PM
 
Answered my own question about the RAZR via Google. Here's a picture of the removable battery in place:



And yet, it's still quite thin and sleek, no?

     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:33 PM
 
Originally Posted by strictlyplaid
Hm, I don't like the removable door thing, but some cell phones have batteries that are literally one-piece deals where the back of it is the back of the phone. So you could save the door pieces, etc. and have the appearance of a sleek one-piece unit. Not sure how much smaller the internal wiring can be thanks to the soldering, but I imagine all you'd have to do is solder the wires to copper connectors rather than to the battery terminals.

Anyone know how the RAZR does it? Does that have a removable battery?
It doesn't necessarily have to be a removable door, that's just the first thing that came to mind. Either one (door/battery or battery door) would require a seal, possibly further adding bulk to the unit.
I'm pretty sure the wire difference between a removable battery and straight wired isn't much, but then you have one more set of connections, a mechanical one, which is prone to failure as well (Have you ever bent the terminals in the back of a calculator/phone, etc to make the connection better, or heard of the eraser to clean a contact?). You know how these class action lawsuit people are...
Baits and Club
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:36 PM
 
Originally Posted by strictlyplaid
Answered my own question about the RAZR via Google. Here's a picture of the removable battery in place:
And yet, it's still quite thin and sleek, no?
Perhaps, but if you close it, it would be a better example, as the screen/keyboard are on different sides. I know nothing about the phone, though, it might be smaller closed.

I'm not saying it can't be made with a removable battery, I just think it would make it larger.
Baits and Club
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:44 PM
 
Originally Posted by dampeoples
It doesn't necessarily have to be a removable door, that's just the first thing that came to mind. Either one (door/battery or battery door) would require a seal, possibly further adding bulk to the unit.
My cellphone (Samsung R225) doesn't have a seal and it's never been a problem. As long as you don't plunge the nano into water, which I wouldn't recommend even with the one-piece unit, I can't see why that would be an issue.

Originally Posted by dampeoples
I'm pretty sure the wire difference between a removable battery and straight wired isn't much, but then you have one more set of connections, a mechanical one, which is prone to failure as well (Have you ever bent the terminals in the back of a calculator/phone, etc to make the connection better, or heard of the eraser to clean a contact?). You know how these class action lawsuit people are...
Actually, having owned a number of these devices, I never have done any of those things because I only swap out the rechargeable batteries once every few years. If the swapping were more frequent, I'd believe it -- or, if Apple had manufacturing issues that meant they came out bent from the factory, but usually Apple's build quality is quite good. I still think the fact that the nano is basically disposable without a replaceable battery is a bigger problem than an occasional bent contact, though perhaps you could convince me with usability studies or something.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:45 PM
 
This battery thing is the last concern that I have with the Nano.
"That's okay, I'd like to keep it on manual control for a while."
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 10:49 PM
 
Originally Posted by Scandalous Ion Cannon
This battery thing is the last concern that I have with the Nano.
What concerns do you have?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 11:15 PM
 
Originally Posted by strictlyplaid
What concerns do you have?
I'm concerned about how I'm going to fend off the throngs of hot women who will want to have my children due to me sporting such a cool and sexy tech gadget.

ImpulseResponse
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 12, 2005, 11:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by strictlyplaid
What concerns do you have?
Honestly the firewire syncing thing. I am getting one for my sister who has the original iPod and my G4 cube. It is fast syncing with firewire but it is going to be odd giving her a new one and having it take 4 hours to fill. I also don't like Apple ditching firewire.

Also the fact that the headphone port doesn't have the extra pins means add ons could be limited. The fact that the ports on the bottom are off centre is also shitty because adding it to a speaker system will make it look off centre or not work at all.

Either way I am still buying one for me and my sis.
"That's okay, I'd like to keep it on manual control for a while."
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Semi Posting Retirement *ReJoice!*
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 02:53 AM
 
Originally Posted by budster101
I dig the nano just as it is and would not change a thing. Have you even used one? It's freaking awesome... and all you have to do is velcro it to the back of your phone and now you have an iTunes Phone iPod...

i'd put that scratch/sharpie resistant coating that was announced a few months back (the stuff that would make cd/dvd's damn near invulnerable...

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 03:11 AM
 
Originally Posted by meelk
This is *exactly* the point that these idiots who just crawl up Apple's ass and sniff roses instead of crap are missing.
Charming.

Quoted on slashdot:

If you want to reduce reliability of a soldered connection, add a connector. If it still isn't unreliable enough, add a socket.

And looking at that thing: adding a battery connector would have increased the length by at least a mm.

And adding a simply removable battery the thickness by at least 2 mm.


As it is, *most* people don't replace their current iPod's batteries themselves (though many do), and yet, they still manage to find technically savvy people who'll do it for them. Is there ANY reason assume that things will be different with the nano?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Teaneck, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 03:30 AM
 
I am firmly on the side that says this battery problem is nonsense. I have never replaced a battery on any of my cell phones, my laptop, or anything else that uses a lithium ion battery (except maybe a digital camera). I don't think people need to change the batteries in their ipods as much as some people think they do. I wish the battery in my phone was soldered because as it is it frequently loses contact and turns off.

The lack of firewire is the only flaw I see. (Does it work with the pocketdock, or will it once the new devices that use the new dock connector come out?)
ATT iPhone 4; 13" MBP; MDD G4.
http://twitter.com/SSharon27
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 04:26 AM
 
I'd buy one if I could hook my camera up to it, which is one of the main reasons I'm going to replace my old 2nd Gen iPod with a new one.

RIP Mini. You were a good seller and very cute. The Japanese loved you.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 04:44 AM
 
Have the nano batteries failed already? That was quick!

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Baninated
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 04:55 AM
 
...
(Last edited by porieux; Oct 2, 2006 at 06:33 AM. )
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 06:44 AM
 
Originally Posted by SSharon
I wish the battery in my phone was soldered because as it is it frequently loses contact and turns off.
That wouldn't be a Nokia, would it?
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 07:05 AM
 
Originally Posted by analogika
Charming.

Quoted on slashdot:

If you want to reduce reliability of a soldered connection, add a connector. If it still isn't unreliable enough, add a socket.

And looking at that thing: adding a battery connector would have increased the length by at least a mm.

And adding a simply removable battery the thickness by at least 2 mm.
Without evidence, this is just a restatement of a position. Sorry that I don't put stock in the authority of random Slashdotters... But if +1mm in length was all that a removable battery took, I'd gladly take the compromise. The nano would still be, well, nano!

Originally Posted by porieux
I have a RAZR and it's quite a bit thicker than the iPod nano.
I am considering the velcro thing though...
Interesting... wonder if that's because it's a phone and not an MP3 player, or because of the battery design. Not sure. Is it possible to make a nano-sized phone? That would be sweet!
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 08:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by strictlyplaid
Without evidence, this is just a restatement of a position. Sorry that I don't put stock in the authority of random Slashdotters... But if +1mm in length was all that a removable battery took, I'd gladly take the compromise. The nano would still be, well, nano!
I'm sorry, but the fact that solder joints are superior to plug connectors is a) conventional wisdom, and b) obvious to anyone who's ever worked with electronics. The unreliability of extremely shallow battery connector sockets is something that just about all Nokia phone owners can attest to.

Now, take a look at internal photographs of the iPods and the new nano - check out the size of that battery connector. That's a couple of millimeters.

Now take a look at the battery compartment lid on your mobile phone. Depending on how well-constructed/robust it is, it will add a millimeter or three to the phone. The thinner it is, the more likely you will have inadvertently pulled it off over the past few years - not to mention that the battery and lid are ALWAYS the first thing to fly off somewhere. And the stupid lid always gets looser over time. At least for every one of my phones.

*Great* care and a helluva lotta work went into making the nano as absurdly tiny as humanly possible, while keeping it extremely sturdy and resilient to flex - if the Ars Technica destruction test is any indicator. There is no tolerance for any lid latch, and *everything* has been stripped down to reduce unnecessary bulk.

Yeah, they're hellishly anal about the design, but that extra two millimeters shaved down is precisely why this thing will sell on a scale that will put the iPod mini to shame.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 09:19 AM
 
Wrong forum.

This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 13, 2005, 10:35 AM
 
This arguement doesnt change the fact that Apple seems to be the only company making portable electronics that feels that the end user should not be easily able to change out their own battery. From phones, to PDAs, to Gameboys and beyond, everyone allows you to change the battery in pretty much any portable electronic device. Imagine having to send your watch in for service when the battery ran out instead of just buying another and putting it in yourself.
     
 
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2