Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

Tiresias · Sep 20, 2005, 06:18 PM

Why does my signature pic have a dimensions caption at the bottom? Or can only I see it?

Cold Warrior · Sep 20, 2005, 06:21 PM

I see it.

lavar78 · Sep 20, 2005, 06:23 PM

You need to use one of the other links from Imageshack (i.e., the one that has [ img ] tags).

BTW, that's not a legal signature.

Lateralus · Sep 20, 2005, 06:24 PM

Because you're not following the signature rules. 200x50, max.

Change it.

Tiresias · Sep 20, 2005, 06:31 PM

Originally Posted by lavar78

You need to use one of the other links from Imageshack (i.e., the one that has [ img ] tags).

BTW, that's not a legal signature.

Don't worry. It's just a test.

But what do you mean by legal?

Edit: Ah. I see. Ignore.

Doofy · Sep 20, 2005, 06:53 PM

Originally Posted by Lateralus

Because you're not following the signature rules.

I thought those included "no more than one line of text if you have a graphic".

Originally Posted by Lateralus

200x50, max.

Where is this stated? I was looking for the rules the other day and couldn't find 'em.

Lateralus · Sep 20, 2005, 06:55 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

I thought those included "no more than one line of text if you have a graphic".

Huh?

Originally Posted by Doofy

Where is this stated? I was looking for the rules the other day and couldn't find 'em.

At the top of every forum listing.

Doofy · Sep 20, 2005, 07:02 PM

Originally Posted by Lateralus

Huh?

Signatures
Our current signature rules give you two options:

1) an image (200x50px max, 10KB max, non-animated) and up to one line of text, OR

2) no image, and up to four lines of text.

In either case, blank lines do count, and lines must be of reasonable length so they don't wrap on most screens.

On a 1024 x 768 browser window, you're running 2 lines.

Originally Posted by Lateralus

At the top of every forum listing.

Doh!

Lateralus · Sep 20, 2005, 07:09 PM

Originally Posted by Doofy

On a 1024 x 768 browser window, you're running 2 lines.

Not the rest of the forum's fault that your resolution is set to 1998.

Doofy · Sep 20, 2005, 07:15 PM

Originally Posted by Lateralus

Not the rest of the forum's fault that your resolution is set to 1998.

(just the browser window, just the window..

)

ambush · Sep 20, 2005, 07:28 PM

OHHHHHHH

BOW BEFORE ME biot-ch!!

budster101 · Sep 20, 2005, 10:26 PM

ambush, your sig is not conforming to the terms of service for MacNN. please adjust it so that it does not give me a seizure or a tumor or both.

turtle777 · Sep 21, 2005, 09:45 AM

Originally Posted by ambush

OHHHHHHH

BOW BEFORE ME biot-ch!!

Your sig suxx. Like mine. I like it.

-t

wdlove · Sep 21, 2005, 10:03 AM

Good luck with your signature,

Tiresias · Sep 21, 2005, 12:06 PM

Originally Posted by wdlove

Good luck with your signature,

Can some one tell if my sig. is too big?

Posters -- one budster101 with special persistence -- are telling me to fix it. I've reduced its size like three times. Soon it'll just be a pixel.

On my computer it's tiny. What are you seeing?

turtle777 · Sep 21, 2005, 12:17 PM

Originally Posted by Mr. Gogarty

Can some one tell if my sig. is too big?

Posters -- one budster101 with special persistence -- are telling me to fix it. I've reduced its size like three times. Soon it'll just be a pixel.

On my computer it's tiny. What are you seeing?

Still too big.

For each monnth of active membership, your sig is allowed 2 pixels.
Since you are in month one, you can only have a 2x2 sig. Sorry.

-t

ajprice · Sep 21, 2005, 05:58 PM

Sorry to hijack the thread, but I thought I'd change mine and didn't want to start another 'Look at my new sig' thread. Loony Scientologist Tom Cruise is old news now, and I've just been waiting for another celebrity person to screw up their life. Thanks Druggy Kate Moss!

rickey939 · Sep 21, 2005, 06:01 PM

I prefer the gobo sig...sorry ajprice!

ajprice · Sep 21, 2005, 06:03 PM

Gobo???

rickey939 · Sep 21, 2005, 06:04 PM

Originally Posted by ajprice

Gobo???

A little reminder...

TETENAL · Sep 21, 2005, 06:31 PM

Originally Posted by ajprice

Kate Moss!

Oh my god, these are great!

Kate Moss is probably the most gorgeous human being ever and one of the reasons why the UK is the finest country in the world.

By the way, would anybody be willing to make me a Heiner Geißler signature?

tooki · Sep 21, 2005, 06:41 PM

Originally Posted by Lateralus

Not the rest of the forum's fault that your resolution is set to 1998.

1998 eh? I dunno, but the iBooks and 12" PowerBooks they sell in my neck of the woods still have that resolution display!

tooki

Doofy · Sep 21, 2005, 08:09 PM

Originally Posted by TETENAL

Kate Moss is probably the most gorgeous human being ever and one of the reasons why the UK is the finest country in the world.

You are insane.

JoshuaZ · Sep 21, 2005, 08:18 PM

i second the insane thing. Not hot.

alligator · Sep 21, 2005, 08:44 PM

I hate turtle's sig. Makes me think it's a photo of a dead animal. Oh wait, it is.

alligator · Sep 21, 2005, 08:49 PM

Course I shouldn't talk. I had to beg for mine. Ahh, I can live with Turtle's sig. Just change it up once in a while. Get tired of looking at the same sig for months on end.

keekeeree · Sep 21, 2005, 11:09 PM

Originally Posted by Lateralus

Not the rest of the forum's fault that your resolution is set to 1998.

LOL...that's too frickin' funny...

(and that's a genuine "LOL"...not the fake kind!)

But hey, my resolution is set to 1996...832x624 on an Apple Multiple Scan 15AV. Everytime I look at it I have flashbacks of my Performa 6400

Cubeoid · Sep 21, 2005, 11:25 PM

Originally Posted by TETENAL

Kate Moss is probably the most gorgeous human being ever and one of the reasons why the UK is the finest country in the world.

To those that agree not, you are wrong.