Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Florida Cops: Trigger Happy

Florida Cops: Trigger Happy
Thread Tools
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 08:29 AM
 
As a lot of you remember from a thread that I previously posted before about how local cops like to taser people (Florida residents beware driving through Delray, Delray Beach, Boynton, or Boynton Beach), now we have a situation where, last night, one cop shot another at our Citrus Bowl.

Read here.

I don't know how this could have happened, to be honest, but something needs to be done. Neither one of them should have been shooting their guns, in my opinion.

Now, this is a case when a taser would have been acceptable.

Very sad and unbelievable.

     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 08:34 AM
 
"To serve and protect"

To be fair, if the second officer had no way to know that the plainclothes officer was actually a policeman then I can kind of understand his reaction. You don't want a madman pulling a gun in a crowd.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 08:50 AM
 
Very scetchy info in that article. I think judgement should be reserved until all the known facts are assembled.
Why is there always money for war, but none for education?
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 08:54 AM
 
Obviously the uniformed officer had no idea that the guy waving a gun around was another cop. Would YOU have known that? Probably not.

The real problem is hooliganism at any sporting event, and college sports in particular. People get downright retarded at these events, and they just plain old shed their civilized restraint. Why would the fans of a WINNING team riot and destroy cars and property? (This has happened as recently as last spring after the NCAA basketball finals.)

So an undercover cop investigating (apparently) underage drinking gets involved in a fight, and a uniformed cop responds to the same fight. The undercover cop starts shooting, and the uniformed cop, not knowing the shooter is a cop, shoots him. Sad, but how could you avoid such events without blowing the cover of any and every undercover officer?
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 09:27 AM
 
My point is that this is a case where tasering was more appropriate than firing guns.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 09:54 AM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter
Why would the fans […] riot […]?
Alcohol.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 10:28 AM
 
Originally Posted by Mastrap
"To serve and protect"

To be fair, if the second officer had no way to know that the plainclothes officer was actually a policeman then I can kind of understand his reaction. You don't want a madman pulling a gun in a crowd.

why did the undercover have his gun out, why did he shoot a fan, i don't blame the uniform cop in any way.
Brian says (9:16 AM): I was looking at houses in Ottawa... I actually have a temptation in me to move
Jeff ******* says (9:19 AM): Eww, Ottawa is gross. It's infested with politicians, and presently, 1 Harper as well.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 12:01 PM
 
There is no way, from the information, we can tell if tasers would have been appropriate here Cody.... way to little information. I look at it from this point of view:

1) The under cover cop MAY have been able to use a taser instead of a gun, but we don't have enough information for that.

2) The uniformed cop did his job. Cody, you don't taser someone who is shooting a firearm at you and the crowd... you shoot to kill them. It is a sad, but necessary, fact of life.

How did you mean the taser should have been used in this story?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 12:16 PM
 
I'm talking to a police officer who is a friend and she says that pepper spray should have been used instead.

No one would have been killed.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 12:20 PM
 
But, on WHICH cop? Cody, you can't seriously be saying that if someone is shooting AT a crowd, and at YOU, that you want to pepper spray and taser them?

I have seen pepper spray hit people directly in the face during a takedown and have NO effect. I have also watched a drug induced idiot be tasered 4 times before he went down.

How many people can the assailant shoot while you are using those non lethal methods of submission?

When someone is shooting at innocent people, or at you, you shoot to kill them.

So, either you are not typing clearly, or the police officer you talked to is basing a decision without all the facts.

I will ask again for clarification.... WHICH cop could have used pepper spray and/or a taser? The undercover one (which I may agree with), or the uniformed cop (which I don't agree with)?

Cheers,

James
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 25, 2005, 12:25 PM
 
Hi Cody,

Yes, any loss of life is very sad. Mistakes can happen with split minute decisions.

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 02:26 AM
 
Here's a link to another article: Orlando Sentinel
A Saturday afternoon tailgating party before the University of Central Florida's home opener: a brawl breaks out. An undercover officer shot in the back, killed by another policeman. A young man also shot, no one's sure by whom.

In less than 20 minutes, the staccato details about the police shooting rippled around the Florida Citrus Bowl -- murmured from the lips of parking attendants or shouted in slurred, drunken speech across the streets.

Tears mangled black-and-gold face paint on a trio of women, their school pride transformed into school sorrow. Like many who saw the shooting, they were too distraught to do more than nod. The crowd still poured into the stadium to watch the game.

Dozens of witnesses were corralled into police custody, but more had watched the scene unfold.

On the sidewalk, 23-year-old Jim Reidy repeated his version of the tale. "OK, I saw it all from beginning to end," Reidy said. "It started off with a brawl."

A scuffle broke out in the rows of cars, amid tailgaters and behind a row of six portable toilets, he said. A plainclothes officer, the University of Central Florida Police Department's Mario Jenkins, wrestled with another man.

"It went a little haywire," Reidy said. "He [the officer] had 20 to 30 people standing around, throwing beer at him. Things started to go bad. That's when he whipped out a gun, waving it around. And that's when the other officer started to shoot," Reidy said.

Nicole Jorgensen watched Jenkins confront the other man. She saw the beer fly. She heard the shots.

"He [Jenkins] was coughing up a lot of blood," she said. "It looked like his life was over."

Several people continued to tailgate inside the crime scene, cups brimming with beer and their gas grill a few feet from the black-and-yellow police line.
This article states that the undercover officer was attempting to break up a fight. He was surrounded by 20 to 30 people throwing beer at him. 20 vs. 1 is a deadly force situation. If it was 1 vs. 1 with a beer bottle, then you could argue wether less-than-lethal force should have been used.

I think ultimately this tragedy was the result of poor communication between the two agencies, where the Orlando PD didn't know there was undercover officers in the crowd.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 04:41 AM
 
Originally Posted by TETENAL
Alcohol.

Then they should have organized adequate quantities or allowed people to bring their own.

Edit: I was being sarcastic, alcohol should be banned at sporting events.
(Last edited by moonmonkey; Sep 26, 2005 at 08:40 AM. (Reason:Sarasm))
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 04:46 AM
 
I think the solution is NO alcohol at any games, period.

     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 04:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
I think the solution is NO alcohol at any games, period.

Blasphemy!
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 04:54 AM
 
It serves them all right. Those people throwing beer on the cop are partially responsible for the cop's death. They should be held accountable. I hope they remember that for the rest of their lives.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 04:56 AM
 
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
I think the solution is NO alcohol at any games, period.

What about allowing Americans to drink alcohol at a reasonable age, so when they finally get hold of alcohol, they don't feel the need to binge drink, shout "whoop whoop" while pumping their fists, and do naked dive bombs into swimming pools.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 04:59 AM
 
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
It serves them all right. Those people throwing beer on the cop are partially responsible for the cop's death. They should be held accountable. I hope they remember that for the rest of their lives.

No, the cop pulling a gun on unarmed people, and opening fire into a crowd is totally at fault.
He obviously lost control and the other policeman did his duty "Protect and Serve" and shot him.

Luckily he shot him in time before anyone innocent was killed.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 05:53 AM
 
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
What about allowing Americans to drink alcohol at a reasonable age, so when they finally get hold of alcohol, they don't feel the need to binge drink, shout "whoop whoop" while pumping their fists, and do naked dive bombs into swimming pools.
Reasonable age? Like 26? I agree.

I've seen 40 year old do what you described. So no, lowering the age wont help.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 06:07 AM
 
Yeah.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 07:28 AM
 
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
Then they should have organized adequate quantities or allowed people to bring their own.
Organized adequate quantities? They shouldn't allow any alcohol at such large sports events. Then there wouldn't be riots any more and large sports events would be events for the whole family again instead of just for drunken thugs to live out their aggressions.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 07:45 AM
 
Florida... why do you always hear about stuff like this from there?
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 07:54 AM
 
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
No, the cop pulling a gun on unarmed people, and opening fire into a crowd is totally at fault.
He obviously lost control and the other policeman did his duty "Protect and Serve" and shot him.

Luckily he shot him in time before anyone innocent was killed.
You are so TOTALLY wrong. With a crowd of around 20-30 people, many of whom may have had a variety of weapons (a beer bottle IS a weapon, by the way), I think the undercover cop was probably well within his rights to use his weapon. You've never been in anything like a life-or-death decision situation, have you...

As for "letting Americans drink at a reasonable age," we tried that. When I turned 18 just about every state had lowered the drinking age to 18. And the vast majority of 18 year olds proved that was a mistake because they got almost uniformly stupid. Drunk and disorderly arrests skyrocketed, DUI/DWI by 18-21 year olds skyrocketed, etc. Bad stuff, and it proved that 18 year old Americans as a group were simply not ready for the responsibility tied to having legal access to alcohol.

American PARENTS should be introducing their kids to the RESPONSIBILITIES of alcohol consumption...unfortunately the current crop of parents IS THE SAME GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO PROVED THEY COULDN'T HANDLE ALCOHOL. It's kind of sad, but today's kids are either getting shafted because their parents were losers when it comes to alcohol, or they're learning about alcohol in the worst possible way-from their equally clueless friends.

Responsible alcohol use at a sporting event IS possible. But so few people even try to be responsible with alcohol in any situation. I dispair for humanity in this area; add alcohol to a sporting event and you're more than even money going to wind up with idiots.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 08:31 AM
 
That's a great post.



I think the drinking age should be 22, actually. Right about the time that kids are getting out of college. That way colleges would ban alcohol in dorms and on campuses. There would be a lot more people alive...including a young cop at a football game just trying to do his job.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 08:37 AM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter
You are so TOTALLY wrong. With a crowd of around 20-30 people, many of whom may have had a variety of weapons (a beer bottle IS a weapon, by the way), I think the undercover cop was probably well within his rights to use his weapon. You've never been in anything like a life-or-death decision situation, have you...
What? is it US police procedure to open fire with lethal rounds into a crowd if you feel threatened?

I really really hope not.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 08:54 AM
 
OK, maybe I'm just dense, but I have a question. I understand that the uniformed officer was an Orlando cop, and the undercover officer was a University cop, but you'd think they'd at least talk to each other ahead of time, and let the city cops know that there were plainclothes university cops in the crowd, and what they look like. Especially since both groups were armed.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 08:59 AM
 
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
What? is it US police procedure to open fire with lethal rounds into a crowd if you feel threatened?

I really really hope not.
Who opened fire into a crowd?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Appalachia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 09:44 AM
 
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
My point is that this is a case where tasering was more appropriate than firing guns.
Sorry, but I'm not taking a taser to a gun fight.

Retired
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 09:47 AM
 
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
That's a great post.



I think the drinking age should be 22, actually. Right about the time that kids are getting out of college. That way colleges would ban alcohol in dorms and on campuses. There would be a lot more people alive...including a young cop at a football game just trying to do his job.
Hi Cody,

I miss your very nice Signature.

It would seem that proper use of alcohol at home might be a good start.

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ------>
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 10:35 AM
 
Originally Posted by wdlove
Hi Cody,

I miss your very nice Signature.

It would seem that proper use of alcohol at home might be a good start.
Did she accidentally delete it in a drunken stupor?

"'Jelly Hat' sounds silly," I told Prince. "How about something poetic, like 'Raspberry Beret.'"
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 06:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
What? is it US police procedure to open fire with lethal rounds into a crowd if you feel threatened?

I really really hope not.
The way I read the story the undercover officer was in the middle of the melee, NOT just shooting into it. There's a BIG difference there, you know. If I have a crowd surrounding me and potentially trying to kill me, I hope SOMEBODY will do something to break it up.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 06:31 PM
 
Cody Dawg: saving the world one article at a time.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 26, 2005, 06:45 PM
 
Hi WDLove:

I tried to iChat with you today but you were gone.

Just wanted to let you know.

Ciao!

     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2