[Cody Dawg]

Link to 13-year old racist singing girls.

This is truly unbelievable.

Just when you think you've heard and seen it all along comes something like this.

[ShotgunEd]

"We're proud of being white, we want to keep being white,"

Then don't do the opposite to "Jacko".

[Randman]

Saw that on Drudge (as usual). Give them a few years then they'll meet some dude and as some have said: Once you go black, you don't back.

[Cody Dawg]

Saw that on Drudge (as usual). Give them a few years then they'll meet some dude and as some have said: Once you go black, you don't back.

Randman, that's very funny!

Yeah, and they'll probably appear on the Montel Williams talk show.

[andi*pandi]

this is why home schooling has a bad rep. Oy!

[ghporter]

"'Baby!?' Mein Fureher never said 'baby!'"

Somehow Adolf and cute singing girls just don't go together for me...

[Doofy]

Cute sickos?

No, I've heard them. It should be "Cute talentless sickos".

[Cubeoid]

Timeline'd!!!

http://forums.macnn.com/95/political-war-lounge/273465/arent-these-little-girls-just-cutest/

[nredman]

in befo da lock yo

[Warung]

Songs like "Sacrifice" — a tribute to Nazi Rudolf Hess, Hitler's deputy Fuhrer — clearly show the effect of the girls' upbringing. The lyrics praise Hess as a "man of peace who wouldn't give up."

LOL

"...their newest song "Blitzkrieg Boogie", praises the Wehrmacht's struggle to uphold peace and social justice in Eastern Europe in the 1930s. "There is nothing like the soothing and gentle sound of a Leopard Panzer bringing freedom™ and prosperity to uncivilised, lesser countries" says teenage NAZI prodigy Lynx, who has an IQ in the single digits..."

[Spliffdaddy]

Yeah, they're only slightly more stupid and pointless than ABC's Primetime.

[Cody Dawg]

What's sad is that they are becoming poster children for neo-Nazism.



Anyway, they're getting their 15 minutes of fame. Nevermind that no respectable label or PR group would want them.

[Diggory Laycock]

Welcome to circa. 2000:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_T...Weird_Weekends

[davesimondotcom]

Sad thing is that these girls never had a chance. If you are doing these things at 13, it's not from forming real opinions, it's from indoctrination at the hands of your parents.

[wdlove]

Originally Posted by Cody Dawg

What's sad is that they are becoming poster children for neo-Nazism.



Anyway, they're getting their 15 minutes of fame. Nevermind that no respectable label or PR group would want them.

Hi Cody,

I saw an advertisement about them on TV last week. The had a feature done on "Prime Time Live" last Thursday.

[Mastrap]

Originally Posted by davesimondotcom

Sad thing is that these girls never had a chance. If you are doing these things at 13, it's not from forming real opinions, it's from indoctrination at the hands of your parents.

Exactly.

[PacHead]

Big deal, those two girls and their stupid songs don't bother me. Neo Nazis and white supremacists suck bigtime and they've probably been raised by some uneducated, inbred hillbilly parents but what they're doing is no different than all of the black artists who release songs with racist lyrics. The only difference is that some of the black racist artists sell a lot more copies.



http://home.att.net/~phosphor/introtogrammys.html

[SVass]

[QUOTE=PacHead]Big deal, those two girls and their stupid songs don't bother me. Neo Nazis and white supremacists suck bigtime and they've probably been raised by some uneducated, inbred hillbilly parents but what they're doing is no different than all of the black artists who release songs with racist lyrics. The only difference is that some of the black racist artists sell a lot more copies.
Actually, a better analogy would be the Ann Coulter and her remarks about Muslims. sam

[PacHead]

Originally Posted by SVass

Actually, a better analogy would be the Ann Coulter and her remarks about Muslims. sam

I beg to differ. My analogy is better because it compares music artists to other music artists. Ann Coulter is a political author and not a musician. I like Ann Coulter so I probably would agree with what she said about muslims anyhow.

[Mastrap]

Anybody who generalizes about a religious group (i.e. Christians, Muslims, Jews are 'insert your opinion here') is an idiot.

[Warung]

Originally Posted by PacHead

I like Ann Coulter so I probably would agree with what she said about muslims anyhow.

Well, considering your both complete and total fascists, this really doesn't come as a surprise.

[PacHead]

Originally Posted by Mastrap

Anybody who generalizes about a religious group (i.e. Christians, Muslims, Jews are 'insert your opinion here') is an idiot.

A generalization is valid if it happens to be true. I stick to facts.

[PacHead]

Originally Posted by Warung

Well, considering your both complete and total fascists, this really doesn't come as a surprise.

Here we go again with some European (Europeans have plenty of first hand knowledge regarding both fascism and nazism) calling other people for fascists.

[Warung]

Originally Posted by PacHead

Here we go again with some European (Europeans have plenty of first hand knowledge regarding both fascism and nazism) calling other people for fascists.

Hey, I call 'em as I see 'em.

"My libertarian friends are probably getting a little upset now but I think that's because they never appreciate the benefits of local fascism."- Ann Coulter on MSNBC 2/8/97

[PacHead]

Originally Posted by Warung

Hey, I call 'em as I see 'em.

I'm not a fascist though I'd probably rather be called a fascist than a liberal or socialist.

[wataru]

Originally Posted by Mastrap

Anybody who generalizes about a religious group (i.e. Christians, Muslims, Jews are 'insert your opinion here') is an idiot.

What about people who generalize about generalizers?

[Warung]

Originally Posted by PacHead

I'm not a fascist though I'd probably rather be called a fascist than a liberal or socialist.

Funny. Liberals and socialists were exactly the kind of people that the NAZIs dispised the most. What a koinkidink.

[Eug Wanker]

Originally Posted by wataru

What about people who generalize about generalizers?

I hate people who generalize. They're all the same!

P.S. Speaking of racist idiots, I'm still surprised that Kanye West didn't get struck from the iTunes event.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by Mastrap

Anybody who generalizes about a religious group (i.e. Christians, Muslims, Jews are 'insert your opinion here') is an idiot.

Are you including the folks who constantly say "islam is a peaceful religion" in that?

[PacHead]

Originally Posted by Warung

Funny. Liberals and socialists were exactly the kind of people that the NAZIs dispised the most. What a koinkidink.

No, I believe Jews are exactly the kind of people that the NAZIs despised the most. The Nazis did take the name "socialist" and incorporated it into their own party name since it was popular at the time. As for Hitler and his attitude towards socialists/liberals, you're correct he wasn't fond of socialists, at least the man had a few good ideas.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by Warung

Funny. Liberals and socialists were exactly the kind of people that the NAZIs dispised the most.

Funny that. I thought (capitalist) Jews were their main target of dislike.

[PacHead]

Originally Posted by Eug Wanker

P.S. Speaking of racist idiots, I'm still surprised that Kanye West didn't get struck from the iTunes event.

I was recently watching the last Apple event, where they announced the new imac and ipod. I had to install quicktime which kind of sucked, but that's another story. Steve Jobs must be high because he was talking about Kanye West as if he was on the same level as a Madonna or other big artists that've been around for a long time. And Steve Jobs constantly shows stupid Kanye West album covers when demonstrating the Itunes store.

[chris v]

Originally Posted by PacHead

Hitler (...) had (...) good ideas.

Quoted.

[Warung]

Originally Posted by PacHead

No, I believe Jews are exactly the kind of people that the NAZIs despised the most.

Actually they used the term "Jews" and "communists/socialists" interchangeable at times. The idea was, that the Jewish people, because of their liberal attitudes and inclusive/international narratives, were the main conduit and proponents of marxism/communism.

NAZISm was all about negative narratives, invested cruelty, nationalism and the conflation of inherited wealth, corporations and the state. Hmmmm...sounds a lot like some other country we hear a lot about these days.

[Warung]

Originally Posted by Doofy

I thought (communists) Jews were their main target of dislike.

Fixed that.™

[Mastrap]

Originally Posted by Doofy

Funny that. I thought (capitalist) Jews were their main target of dislike.

Nope. Untermenschen were the main target of dislike.

Untermenschen (below human) were Jews, homosexuals, socialists, communists, the entirety of the black and Slavic races, the mentally ill, people suffering from addictions, the infertile.

Pretty much anybody who didn't toe the party line.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by Warung

Actually they used the term "Jews" and "communists/socialists" interchangeable at times. The idea was, that the Jewish people, because of their liberal attitudes and inclusive/international narratives, were the main conduit and proponents of marxism/communism.

Wrong. The main reason that old Adolf didn't like the Jews was because they appeared to profit from Germans whilst performing no work - i.e. they were the typical capitalist "leeches". Much of what Adolf found distasteful about the Jews can be found in modern day socialists' views of the capitalist overclass.

Go read your Mein Kampf and get it from the horse's mouth.

[Warung]

Originally Posted by Doofy

The main reason that old Adolf didn't like the Jews was because they appeared to profit from Germans whilst performing no work - i.e. they were the typical capitalist "leeches".

Though that may be true to a certain extent, the main reason for targeting Jews specifically is because they couldn't be assimilated into the authoritarian, profit and nationalist oriented superstructure.

As much as modern neo-cons and capitalfascists want to deny this, the underlying drive behind all of fascism is unquestioned authoritarian rule of inherited wealth, the political class and big industry under the guise of nationalist idealism.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by Warung

As much as modern neo-cons and capitalfascists want to deny this, the underlying drive behind all of fascism is unquestioned authoritarian rule of inherited wealth, the political class and big industry under the guise of nationalist idealism.

That's complete tripe. The main drive behind fascism is someone totally convinced he's doing something good for mankind or his fellow countrymen.

Unless you can prove otherwise and point out Adolf's inherited wealth.

[nonhuman]

Originally Posted by Doofy

Wrong. The main reason that old Adolf didn't like the Jews was because they appeared to profit from Germans whilst performing no work - i.e. they were the typical capitalist "leeches". Much of what Adolf found distasteful about the Jews can be found in modern day socialists' views of the capitalist overclass.

Go read your Mein Kampf and get it from the horse's mouth.

Yes, read Mein Kampf and see that Hitler didn't like socialism either. It's right there in the beginning when he's talking about the workers he worked with as a young man in Vienna. Somewhere in-between when he's defending Jews as an unfortunately oppressed people and attacking them as a pervasive force destroying the true German society.

[OldManMac]

Here's a little something for those who worship Ann Coulter.

[SVass]

Originally Posted by Doofy

That's complete tripe. The main drive behind fascism is someone totally convinced he's doing something good for mankind or his fellow countrymen.

Unless you can prove otherwise and point out Adolf's inherited wealth.

Actually, it was a lust for power and wealth just like the current clowns. That leadership may have used particular code words to describe an enemy; but, they could just as easily have used "terrorist" and "9/11" instead of "Juden" and "Reichstag feuer" sam

[Warung]

Originally Posted by Doofy

That's complete tripe. The main drive behind fascism is someone totally convinced he's doing something good for mankind or his fellow countrymen.

Pfff. You obviously don't have a clue what you are talking about. But that's so typical of reactionary twits. They read "Mein Kampf" and think they know what national socialism and fascism is really about.

[nonhuman]

Originally Posted by SVass

Actually, it was a lust for power and wealth just like the current clowns. That leadership may have used particular code words to describe an enemy; but, they could just as easily have used "terrorist" and "9/11" instead of "Juden" and "Reichstag feuer" sam

Yes, but Hitler definitely wasn't part of the 'inherited wealth', 'political class', or 'industrial' groups. He was a poor orphan who wanted nothing more than to be an artist but had to work for a living and ended up being drawn into the prevalent anti-Semitic political scene of the time which he then managed to turn to his own purposes, and you know the rest.

[von Wrangell]

Originally Posted by Doofy

Are you including the folks who constantly say "islam is a peaceful religion" in that?

They would be talking about the religion itself and not the "religious group". So it's not the same.

[OldManMac]

Originally Posted by Doofy

That's complete tripe. The main drive behind fascism is someone totally convinced he's doing something good for mankind or his fellow countrymen.

Unless you can prove otherwise and point out Adolf's inherited wealth.

Hitler was a madman; his rise to power had absolutely nothing to do with him believing that he could do something good for mankind and his fellow countryman! Pullleeeeeze.

[Cody Dawg]

Hitler was also Jewish.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by Adolf Hitler, 1919

Dear Herr Gemlich,

If the threat with which Jewry faces our people has given rise to undeniable hostility on the part of a large section of our people, the cause of this hostility must be sought in the clear recognition that Jewry as such is deliberately or unwittingly having a pernicious effect on our nation, but mostly in personal intercourse, in the poor impression the Jew makes as an individual. As a result, antisemitism far too readily assumes a purely emotional character. But this is not the correct response. Antisemitism as a political movement may not and cannot be molded by emotional factors but only by recognition of the facts. Now the facts are these:

To begin with, the Jews are unquestionably a race, not a religious community. The Jew himself never describes himself as a Jewish German, a Jewish Pole or a Jewish American, but always as a German, Polish or American Jew. Jews have never adopted more than the language of the foreign nations in whose midst they live. A German who is forced to make use of the French language in France, Italian in Italy, Chinese in China does not thereby become a Frenchman, Italian, or Chinaman, nor can we call a Jew who happens to live amongst us and who is therefore forced to use the German language, a German. Neither does the Mosaic faith, however great its importance for the preservation of that race, be the sole criterion for deciding who is a Jew and who is not. There is hardly a race in the world whose members all belong to a single religion.

Through inbreeding for thousands of years, often in very small circles, the Jew has been able to preserve his race and his racial characteristics much more successfully than most of the numerous people among whom he has lived. As a result there lives amongst us a non-German, alien race, unwilling and indeed unable to shed its racial characteristics, its particular feelings, thoughts and ambitions and nevertheless enjoying the same political rights as we ourselves do. And since even the Jew's feelings are limited to the purely material realm, his thoughts and ambitions are bound to be so even more strongly. Their dance around the golden calf becomes a ruthless struggle for all the possessions that we feel deep down are not the highest and not the only ones worth striving for on this earth.

The value of an individual is no longer determined by his character or by the significance of his achievements for the community, but solely by the size of his fortune, his wealth.

The greatness of a nation is no longer measured by the sum of its moral and spiritual resources, but only by the wealth of its material possessions.

All this results in that mental attitude and that quest for money and the power to protect it which allow the Jew to become so unscrupulous in his choice of means, so merciless in their use of his own ends. In autocratic states he cringes before the 'majesty' of the princes and misuses their favors to become a leech on their people.

In democracies he vies for the favor of the masses, cringes before 'the majesty of the people', but only recognizes the majesty of money.

He saps the prince's character with Byzantine flattery; national pride and the strength of the nation with ridicule and shameless seduction to vice. His method of battle is that public opinion which is never expressed in the press but which is nonetheless manages and falsified by it. His power is the power of the money, which multiplies in his hands effortlessly and endlessly through interest, and with which he imposes a yoke upon the nation that is the more pernicious in that its glitter disguises its ultimately tragic consequences. Everything that makes the people strive for higher goals, be it religion, socialism, or democracy, is to the Jew merely a means to an end, the way to satisfy his greed and thirst for power.

[OldManMac]

Originally Posted by Cody Dawg

Hitler was also Jewish.

That is speculation; I don't believe it's ever been confirmed. The speculation is that he was part Jewish.
From http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/adolf_hitler.htm
Hitler's father was the illegitimate child of a cook named (Maria Anna) Schickelgruber. This cook, the grandmother of Adolf Hitler, was working for a Jewish family named Frankenburger, when she became pregnant. Frankenburger paid Schickelbruber, a paternity allowance from the time of the child's birth up to his fourteenth year.

-------

Hitler had as many of his birth records and family historys as he could find, destroyed, when he came to power. There was an interesting show on Hitler's family history, on the History Channel, just a few weeks ago.

[Cody Dawg]

Hitler had as many of his birth records and family historys as he could find, destroyed, when he came to power.

So, Hitler thought he was Jewish also.

That was really my point.