Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Jobs Wanted to Move to Intel 5 Years Ago.

Jobs Wanted to Move to Intel 5 Years Ago.
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 127.0.0.1
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2005, 05:54 PM
 
http://news.com.com/Is+the+PowerPC+d...3-5983157.html

Weren't you there during the discussions when IBM convinced Apple to adopt the G5?
Mayer: In my previous job, I ran IBM's semiconductor business. So I've seen both sides of the Apple story, because I sold the G5 to Steve (Jobs) the first time he wanted to move to Intel.

Five years ago?
Mayer: Yeah, that's about right. So I sold the G5. First I told IBM that we needed to do it, and then I sold it to Apple that the G5 was good and it was going to be the follow-on of the PowerPC road map for the desktop. It worked pretty well. And then IBM decided not to take the G5 into the laptop and decided to really focus its chip business on the game consoles.
So there's the answer as to why no PowerBook G5 has or will ever surface.

Discuss.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2005, 05:56 PM
 
Cool.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2005, 05:57 PM
 
I predicted this in the other thread. I'll go as far to predict Jobs wanted to move to Intel from day 1.

As for Powerbook G5's, the guy basically said in the article IBM dropped the ball on a mobile G5 when they decided to go for game consoles. I don't blame Jobs for that.
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2005, 06:19 PM
 
Wow, exactly what people have been saying all along.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2005, 07:36 PM
 
All the rumors, while there was nothing to back them up, were true.

Imagine if we did move to Intel in 2000? We would have had Pentium III Macs!

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 7, 2005, 11:47 PM
 
It would have been nice during the P4 hay day . Granted we'd be screwed on some stuff but...
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 8, 2005, 03:01 AM
 
Wow, thats cool. Makes sense though.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 8, 2005, 03:10 AM
 
Wow, thats cool. Makes sense though.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 8, 2005, 06:11 AM
 
So all in all it was IBM's fault.

There ya have it folks.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2