Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Who's Buying New?

Who's Buying New?
Thread Tools
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 08:10 AM
 
So, the new Macs are here.

Is anyone here running out to buy any of the latest offerings from Apple?

I read Pogues review here of the new Macs and though they're faster, there are drawbacks.

Apple says that according to technical benchmarks, the new laptop, for example, is four times as fast as the previous model. In the real world, even a few minutes of testing on these Macs proves that Web pages appear nearly instantaneously, huge photo libraries scroll briskly, and programs pop open after only a second or two. These Macs even start up faster - so fast that the big Apple logo makes only a fleeting appearance.

But there is a hitch: you get all of this speed only when you're running programs that have been rewritten especially for the Intel chip.

Apple has already rewritten Mac OS X and its constellation of programs (like its e-mail program, Web browser and the iLife suite). Other programs, including Microsoft Office and Photoshop, still work - the new Macs seamlessly translate older software so that the Intel chip can process it - but they run at the old speed, or even slower.

Apple warns that programs requiring speed, like professional video and sound editing software, may not run at all in this translation mode. That includes Apple's own Final Cut Pro, Aperture and other high-end software, but Apple says you can "crossgrade" to the Intel-based versions in March for $50 each.

If such programs are critical to your work, wait until they've been updated to speak the Intel chip's language before buying an Intel-based Mac.
Normally a new PowerBook offering would have me seriously considering a new purchase since it's been a year since I bought this one and I buy new annually (one of the luxuries I afford myself from time to time) but this new PowerBook is rev A and who knows if it gets really hot, has bugs in it, etc.

Anyway, let us know if you're tempted or not and if so (or not) why.

     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 08:31 AM
 
I was really tempted, but this time I am waiting for the next revision. Moving everything to a new processor and architecture isn't easy and I just feel more comfortable waiting for a little while.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Why do you care?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 08:31 AM
 
I'll wait 2-3 years until all software is Universal and my 6 month old iMac is really outdated. I'm still pissed at Apple for having two iMac revisions within ~ 4-5 months of each other. I bought a Rev. B 20" iMac G5 in May/June (right after it came out). Then in October (?) they release an updated enclosure, iSight built-in, Front Row, remote, etc. for a bit less money. Grrrrr. Now, 2-3 months after that, they release an iMac with an Intel chip. Product cycles of 3-4 months is a little ridiculous IMO.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 08:44 AM
 
I hear you, Jingles.

I agree, also, BTW. Apple totally screwed people on that from that standpoint.

I'm tempted also, but I'm also afraid.

I was checking out the new notebook online and I swear, I had dreams last night about buying a new notebook and I dreamt that I got 2nd degree burns from picking it up. Weird dream.

I'm wondering how hot it's going to be (notebook).

If anyone has seen one (or even bought one) let us know what you think?

     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 08:51 AM
 
well somebody has to buy them or there will be no further revisions and Apple will become a media/iPod company.

So I'm taking one for the team here. It's been so long since I've upgraded, this will suit my needs just fine. I suspect that even running Photoshop with Rosetta will seem zippy to me. Sure I'm somewhat concerned as I've never bought a rev a Apple product before, it could be one of those disaster machines, filled with bugs and kinks to work out and so on.

But what the hell.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pretentiously Retired.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 08:58 AM
 
Well I'd love to see a Rev B machine in 4-6 months.
     
Y3a
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA - Just outside DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 09:07 AM
 
I wonder if the 10.4.4 update, which seems to have probelms on many machines, is intended to push us towards the purchase of the new mactel boxes?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 09:11 AM
 
I'm waiting for the MacMini Duo or whatever it'll be called.

I'm working with a 2003 iBook and am too broke to get an AIO or a laptop, I'll get a mini and use a 3rd party display.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 09:36 AM
 
WAY TO GO paul w!!!

When are you going to bite the bullet?

WE ALL WANT A *COMPLETE* DOCUMENTED REVIEW FROM YOU.

Seriously, post it here, from opening the box all the way to actually using the machine - post your complete first impressions here.

I can't wait.

     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 09:48 AM
 
I'm waiting for the Power Macs (or whatever they will be called). The universal software will come. We knew it all wasn't going to be universal from the get-go.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Landlockinated
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 09:50 AM
 
I think the $50 "crossgrade" thing from Apple is a mistake and they'll eventually end up giving the new discs for free. After all, if someone is "crossgrading" that means they just bought NEW hardware. Give them some new discs with "Universal" bianaries and make them happy.

I'm about ready to buy the Macradobe Suite but am tempted to wait until they announce their policy regarding Universal bianaries. I don't want to have to buy it all over again when I get a new MacBook Pro.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:17 AM
 
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
WAY TO GO paul w!!!

When are you going to bite the bullet?

WE ALL WANT A *COMPLETE* DOCUMENTED REVIEW FROM YOU.

Seriously, post it here, from opening the box all the way to actually using the machine - post your complete first impressions here.

I can't wait.

No problem, it'll be new mac pron for all to see and enjoy.

(PM me though for a "private session" )

     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:20 AM
 
I don't understand it when people claim web pages draw so quickly with a processor change. Web page drawing certainly doesn't peg a G5, so if Mactels are across the board faster at drawing web pages there's something else obviously at play. The same thing applies to application launch times - that's a matter of drive speed.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:21 AM
 
I'm very excited about the new Intel Mac.

Like others prefer to wait on reviews. The Rev. B model is of interest.

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:21 AM
 
When are you "doing" it, paul w?

     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:24 AM
 
February 15th, plus time for express shipping. I'm not the only one here who's bought one, but we'll have a little race and see which lucky member gets to satisfy Cody first.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:28 AM
 
Satisfy me?







NOW you're talking!

I'm stupid I guess...is that when they're available? They're not in the stores yet?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:32 AM
 
I ordered one shortly after the announcement. Apple says it will ship by then. That is all I or anyone knows.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:35 AM
 
So they're not in stores then?

Hmmm...



Well, that's okay, I guess.

Maybe they'll have Rev B out by then too.

     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avoiding Hans advances
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:35 AM
 
Really they are only faster for Universal Apps? Who would have thought? Good thing that informative story was there to enlighten us.

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!"
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:45 AM
 
Yeah, Pogue is good that way.

I had no clue about that either. There could've been a mass stampede to buy them except for that crucial bit of information.

Also, I REALLY want to know if they're in stores. People are taking a chance buying online sight unseen aren't they?

Like how hot IS the new notebook, for instance? Remember when the Titaniums FRIED people? Remember those stories about men with baked afrotesticles? (Hi Rob)
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Off the Tobakoff
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:48 AM
 
Originally Posted by Leia's Left Bun
Really they are only faster for Universal Apps? Who would have thought? Good thing that informative story was there to enlighten us.
And whodathunk that most non-altivec-enhanced programs were equally fast on G3s and G4s.
"You rise," he said, "like Aurora."
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avoiding Hans advances
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by Stradlater
And whodathunk that most non-altivec-enhanced programs were equally fast on G3s and G4s.
I remember encoding MP3's was much faster on a G4 when apps supported Alti-Vec.

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:53 AM
 
They shouldn't be in stores yet — due for release in February like Steve said.

That said, yeah, we're missing two important bits of information. One is heat. The other is battery life. For all we know, it heats up to 150° in half an hour and then shuts off immediately. I wouldn't want to buy a laptop with both of these things unknown.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 10:59 AM
 
That's exactly what I'm thinking, Chuckit.

It's kind of like when a studio releases a movie without advance screenings to critics for review.



When that happens that usually means that there's something to be kept quiet about - they don't want the bad news getting around.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avoiding Hans advances
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 11:03 AM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit
They shouldn't be in stores yet — due for release in February like Steve said.

That said, yeah, we're missing two important bits of information. One is heat. The other is battery life. For all we know, it heats up to 150� in half an hour and then shuts off immediately. I wouldn't want to buy a laptop with both of these things unknown.
I can't see it being hotter or not lasting as long as the G4's did.

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 11:57 AM
 
Smaller space, better graphic card, dual-core processor — I could see it. Even being as hot as the TiBook could be bad. And the fact that they aren't telling the battery life, even though they apparently know every other specification and have working machines, is worrisome. It looks like they aren't pleased with it.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 12:05 PM
 
Chuck is right, you know.

He usually is.

     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avoiding Hans advances
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 12:06 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Smaller space, better graphic card, dual-core processor — I could see it. Even being as hot as the TiBook could be bad. And the fact that they aren't telling the battery life, even though they apparently know every other specification and have working machines, is worrisome. It looks like they aren't pleased with it.
The battery is higher wattage and the intel chips have awesome performance per watt. I could see it being the same.

The only thing that might draw more power is the 67% brighter screen.

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 02:06 PM
 
Yeah, it could well be the same. I'm just saying, I wouldn't bet two grand on it.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 02:35 PM
 
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
So, the new Macs are here.

Is anyone here running out to buy any of the latest offerings from Apple?
been several years since a desktop upgrade, so i went for a bto 20" imactel. i was going to purchase in december, but waited out the keynote - i wanted the imac, but may have gone with a mintel had they introduced it and the performance specs were decent.

not really too concerned with the software/processor issues at the moment. i'm jumping from a 7-or-800mhz g4 machine so i'm figuring it'll be sufficiently faster even under rosetta. hoping that by the time i transfer most of my key software will have updated to universal. so unless the whole processor changeover goes horribly wrong, i'll likely be satisfied.

so i'm looking forward to ridding myself soon of that loud emac and replacing it with a bigger, more beautiful, and quieter machine. :-) and if their estimates are accurate my transition will begin sometime next week.

be well.

laeth
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 02:41 PM
 
I'm holding off for the Rev B Intel PowerMac (or whatever they are called).

I don't buy regularly enough to chance a bad system.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: The Tollbooth Capital of the US
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 02:59 PM
 
Well I'm selling my Mac mini and using the money I get from my Tax refund to get one of these Intel iMacs. I can't wait.
"Evil is Powerless If the Good are Unafraid." -Ronald Reagan

Apple and Intel, the dawning of a NEW era.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 03:04 PM
 
I'll buy new in 2 more years....that is, if Apple is still in business.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 06:11 PM
 
Imagine if every 2 - 4 years your telephone or your TV or your automobile or your home appliances or your home itself were rendered less functional because of decisions by the manufacturer and the only way you could retain the level of functionality, ease and compatibility you originally had when you bought new was to KEEP ON BUYING NEW or else with every year you would become more and more crippled until one day the only things you were able to completely use were the features, the functionality built-in to your product or, in this case only the programs already loaded onto your computer.

No new applications were being made for your system. Support was being discontinued right and left. Nothing else on the web was likely to work because your machine was outdated so surfing the web became a study in frustration when more than 50% of the time whatever you clicked wouldn't be compatible.

As consumers we have accepted this paradigm, this business model which squarely places us on a moving conveyor belt and unless we continually buy a new computer every few years we will be left behind in the electronic/information dustbin.

All I can say is enjoy your conspicuous consumption and disposable incomes while ye may.

The conveyor belt stops for no one.

OK.

Now back to your regularly scheduled Pavlovian drooling.
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 06:16 PM
 
In what industry does your product keep getting upgrades while you never have to pay another dime?
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 07:17 PM
 
Originally Posted by aberdeenwriter
Imagine if every 2 - 4 years your telephone or your TV or your automobile or your home appliances or your home itself were rendered less functional because of decisions by the manufacturer and the only way you could retain the level of functionality, ease and compatibility you originally had when you bought new was to KEEP ON BUYING NEW or else with every year you would become more and more crippled until one day the only things you were able to completely use were the features, the functionality built-in to your product or, in this case only the programs already loaded onto your computer.

No new applications were being made for your system. Support was being discontinued right and left. Nothing else on the web was likely to work because your machine was outdated so surfing the web became a study in frustration when more than 50% of the time whatever you clicked wouldn't be compatible.

As consumers we have accepted this paradigm, this business model which squarely places us on a moving conveyor belt and unless we continually buy a new computer every few years we will be left behind in the electronic/information dustbin.

All I can say is enjoy your conspicuous consumption and disposable incomes while ye may.

The conveyor belt stops for no one.

OK.

Now back to your regularly scheduled Pavlovian drooling.
That's all well and good, but for me I just justify it as a business expense. This is a tool - a tool I need, and have become accustomed to. Tools wear in all industries as they get used more freqeuntly than luxury items.

I, being a long time Apple customer, have faith in their tools. I buy the protection plan, sure, but I also have had nothing but good experiences with Apple's support, something I've never heard a PC owner say, quite the contrary.

And sure, I may get a lemon, or a "bad" Apple product. But all this whinging makes me laugh. I really only hear it from folks on forums like this one. Out in the real world EVERYONE I know is working on outdated hardware. It's a miracle the world keeps turning.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 07:22 PM
 
I`m waiting for the 13in Macbook Pro.

Or something to that degree.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Maine
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 07:39 PM
 
looking at the specs of the macbook pro couple things i don't like,

they don't have FW 800 (not that i have anything that has FW 800, but still)

the change in the AC power adapter. the universal power adapter was sweet, if you knew some one with and laptop in the past what 5 years? you could just have bummed their brick and charge her up, now you gotta have the special magnet thingy, oh well.

oh and I am still on a dual G4 500 and a 12 PB 1GHZ on lone from apple. So far I haven't really had the need to upgrade, everything that I want to do works on both comps.

I GOT WASTED WITH PHIL SHERRY!!!
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 09:02 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit
In what industry does your product keep getting upgrades while you never have to pay another dime?
A 1965 Mustang still travels every highway and street in America.

A 1955 Telephone still can call every home in America.

A 1945 House still provides protection, warmth and shelter.

A 1995 Computer is essentially a $40 nostalgia piece capable of doing a few tricks using it's factory installed components and with much investment in upgrading can still surf the web but with the required QT upgrades and iTunes upgrades and this upgrade and that upgrade, many of which require a certain chip speed or RAM or HD capacity the economic decision HAS to be whether it is easier or smarter to upgrade or buy new.

I know people with 1970 era vintage Microwaves that work perfectly.

How long do you expect before Steve rings the bell and your shiny brand new intel iMac is suddenly unacceptable to you and you need the next NEW computer?

Don't be surprised when Apple comes out with what would amount to an I.V. into your pocketbook.

A series of Lifetime Apple Plans. You pay $60 a month and get a brand new iMac and free dial up service. $80/mo gets you DSL. The TOP plan or Lifetime Apple Plan TOP (LAPTOP?) would get you all the doodads and gimmcracks. And rather than it be a credit purchasing plan or lease it would be more like a commodity or utilities company like the phone or gas or electricity company provides you service with the knowledge they know you can't really do without them and they'll always have your business.

They'll save marketing dollars in the long run by just getting everyone signed up and then ringing the bell and everyone clicks a box online and their payments continue or are increased to handle the new higher monthly payment.

They have the needle in us then just open the vein by ringing the bell.

Yes, my way is more streamlined than the current business model.
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 09:12 PM
 
Originally Posted by paul w
That's all well and good, but for me I just justify it as a business expense. This is a tool - a tool I need, and have become accustomed to. Tools wear in all industries as they get used more freqeuntly than luxury items.

I, being a long time Apple customer, have faith in their tools. I buy the protection plan, sure, but I also have had nothing but good experiences with Apple's support, something I've never heard a PC owner say, quite the contrary.

And sure, I may get a lemon, or a "bad" Apple product. But all this whinging makes me laugh. I really only hear it from folks on forums like this one. Out in the real world EVERYONE I know is working on outdated hardware. It's a miracle the world keeps turning.
I don't begrudge anyone their right and ability to enjoy anything they want or need I just want to present the other side of the story. As I said to all here, enjoy your conspicuous consumption and disposable incomes while ye may.
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 12, 2006, 11:44 PM
 
Originally Posted by aberdeenwriter
A 1965 Mustang still travels every highway and street in America.

A 1955 Telephone still can call every home in America.

A 1945 House still provides protection, warmth and shelter.
To the same degree that it did to begin with. A 1995 Mac still runs all the same software it did when it came out. What you want is for it to run more programs. Your 1955 telephone can't use touch-tone services, nor can it take pictures, hold calls or store addresses like modern phones. When smart cars come out, your Mustang will still not be able to drive itself. With computers, the difference is somewhat more marked, but it's still the same phenomenon. Devices have limited capabilities. Newer devices will have more capabilities. The more capabilities things have, the more they are able to do.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2006, 12:05 AM
 
I had planned on getting a nice little widescreen iBook after MWSF, but unfortunately they don't exist yet. Even worse, my current lappy is about to kick the bucket after less than a year. I think I'm gonna go ahead and just buy a 12" Powerbook (getting one really cheap at my Uni's book store). It'll more than keep up with me, and I love the small form factor. I'm sure that in another year or so I'll grab an Intel iMac to go along with it.

Any ramblings are entirely my own, and do not represent those of my employers, coworkers, friends, or species
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2006, 12:36 AM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit
To the same degree that it did to begin with. A 1995 Mac still runs all the same software it did when it came out. What you want is for it to run more programs. Your 1955 telephone can't use touch-tone services, nor can it take pictures, hold calls or store addresses like modern phones. When smart cars come out, your Mustang will still not be able to drive itself. With computers, the difference is somewhat more marked, but it's still the same phenomenon. Devices have limited capabilities. Newer devices will have more capabilities. The more capabilities things have, the more they are able to do.
Not quite true. Imagine roads you once were able to travel have been closed to you because the municipality increased the requirements.

Imagine having to buy a more powerful engine to continue going to work.

Using your touch tone phone example, how about the bank, municipality, healthcare provider or etc. that once had live customer service reps who answered the phone but who now makes you wait a number of minutes while the opening recorded phone greeting goes through at least two cycles then goes to the default connection to a live operator?

How about the organizations with computerized phone systems that don't have a live CSR default at all? You used to do business with them using the old phone but they changed everything on you and now by doing nothing differently you fall behind and begin losing functionality.

To remain at your current level of functionality you are forced to spend. You are forced to keep feeding the Apple conveyor belt so it can keep turning out new products for you and I and the only time this equation becomes a problem is when our disposable incomes dwindles or stop.

Then, the Apple conveyor belt will still spin like mad but you'll be in the water watching the huge luxury liner full of excited happy carefree partygoers and vacationers and ship staff and crew sail off without you until eventually it will be just a speck in the distance and the only music you hear will be from your outdated iPod that is no longer supported.

It will still play the old songs on it from 5 years ago but can't bring on new songs because the iTMS no longer supports your old computer's Tiger OS and iTunes 7.0.

So all the games and functions and songs you have now will be all you'll ever get...unless you belly up to the bar and grease Steve's wheels some more.

For all of your sakes I hope you can continue buying new computers every two years and on the day you breathe your last may your computer be less than two years old.

Cheers!



Now let's see, where IS that link for the Keynote?
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2006, 03:18 AM
 
I think I will be getting a new Mac this year, or between now and what comes out in MWSF 2007 anyway. My G4 runs fine at the moment, with OS X 10.4 etc. When the Intel native/Universal software is more widespread outside Apple's own apps, and more of the Mac range has gone Intel, I'll take a serious look at the options. But at the moment, I'm happy with what I've got, and happy to wait for what is still to come from Intel with the more advanced processors (64 bit etc.). It will probably be a Powermac, because I just like to have the expansion capability (my G4 now has 2 hard drives, a USB 2 card, a wireless 802.11g card, a 16x DVD R drive and bluetooth, which weren't generally available at the release of the computer.)

Look after my manor, or I will bum you, literally, to death.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Detroit
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2006, 06:18 AM
 
At this time, no. I'm waiting on the mini to be updated to Intel (and hopefully at that time, more of a media center than it is now...the current one missed on a few things).
     
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Night's Plutonian shore...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2006, 02:04 PM
 
Here's a 15 minute demo video of the Macbook Pro. I haven't watched this yet, but it might be interesting to those pondering an upgrade.
http://theory.isthereason.com/?p=650

I'm due for a new machine, but I've been debating the merits of waiting for the next revision also. More than likely though, I'll end up buying one of the new iMacs next month.
Nemo me impune lacesset
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Avoiding Hans advances
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2006, 02:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by ThinkInsane
Here's a 15 minute demo video of the Macbook Pro. I haven't watched this yet, but it might be interesting to those pondering an upgrade.
http://theory.isthereason.com/?p=650

I'm due for a new machine, but I've been debating the merits of waiting for the next revision also. More than likely though, I'll end up buying one of the new iMacs next month.

that video was horribly done.

"You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!"
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2006, 02:58 PM
 
I might get a MacBook if I try it out in the store and it feels impressively fast. I'll definitely get one if VMware or something gets ported to OSx and I can run x86 OS's (Linux, Windows) without emulation.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: uk
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2006, 03:18 PM
 
I might get a new imac.
One thing though. On the apple website it sais that MOST applications will work using rosseta. So not all applications will work and i wont know wich one's until i buy it.
     
 
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2