 |
 |
Order of Languages?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status:
Offline
|
|
What was the very first language, then the next one, and so on?
Where do Asiatic languages fit in? And native Americans and their languages?
We were talking about that this morning.
Have any ideas?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's a great question - I can't seem to get Google to find anything about world languages. I can find the timeline for programming languages, which is pretty interesting too.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ------>
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|

"'Jelly Hat' sounds silly," I told Prince. "How about something poetic, like 'Raspberry Beret.'"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the dancefloor, doing the boogaloo…
Status:
Offline
|
|
That would be pretty much impossible to find out, since it is very unlikely that the first spoken "languages" were written down.
My guess would be that the first crude spoken languages developed some 60 - 70 thousand years ago (maybe even as much a million years ago depending on your definition of "language").
|
If I change my way of living, and if I pave my streets with good times, will the mountain keep on giving…
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Off the Tobakoff
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
"You rise," he said, "like Aurora."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ask Oisin or Tooki. They are the resident linguists.
From what little I know there are several major language families that encompass all known languages. English, and most of the Western European languages, are part of the Indo-European family which has as its "mother tongue" Sanskrit.
This site has all the details, including maps. http://home.wanadoo.nl/arjenbolhuis/...-family-trees/
As for the first language, that is lost to history. People were talking for tens of thousands of years before they ever started writing things down. So, if we don't have a written record of a language it is highly unlikely we will ever have a record of it at all.
|
|
One should never stop striving for clarity of thought and precision of expression.
I would prefer my humanity sullied with the tarnish of science rather than the gloss of religion.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sorry I wasn't around and I don't think anyone can truly say for sure.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status:
Offline
|
|
So, I guess the very first "language" would have been weird vocalizations, grunts, etc.
I guess I'm talking about more developed languages.
Sanskrit?
What about Egyptian? And the corresponding hieroglyphics?
Armaic? Hebrew? Egyptian? Greek? Roman? Romance Languages? Germanic languages? Chinese comes in where?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Off the Tobakoff
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
So, I guess the very first "language" would have been weird vocalizations, grunts, etc.
I guess I'm talking about more developed languages.
Sanskrit?
What about Egyptian? And the corresponding hieroglyphics?
Armaic? Hebrew? Egyptian? Greek? Roman? Romance Languages? Germanic languages? Chinese comes in where?
Click links.
|
"You rise," he said, "like Aurora."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Working. What about you?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks, Strad! Didn't see them. The bottom one is better. LOVE IT.

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the South
Status:
Offline
|
|
I thought it was Sanskrit.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
That is a very interesting subject Cody.
You are always having important intelectual thoughts. 
|

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Six feet under and diggin' it.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Uga muga ick wunt womants!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
So, I guess the very first "language" would have been weird vocalizations, grunts, etc.
...so, Welsh then.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
We can't even find the original language for the Indo-European family except by tracing evolution backwards. I don't think it's possible to figure out what languages existed a long time ago and when they came into being. There's just no evidence to work from.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kr0nos
That would be pretty much impossible to find out, since it is very unlikely that the first spoken "languages" were written down.
My guess would be that the first crude spoken languages developed some 60 - 70 thousand years ago (maybe even as much a million years ago depending on your definition of "language").
Dude, I believe its been proven that the Earth is only 5-6 thousand years old. It says so in the Bible. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dcmacdaddy
Ask Oisin or Tooki. They are the resident linguists.
From what little I know there are several major language families that encompass all known languages. English, and most of the Western European languages, are part of the Indo-European family which has as its "mother tongue" Sanskrit.
This site has all the details, including maps. http://home.wanadoo.nl/arjenbolhuis/...-family-trees/
As for the first language, that is lost to history. People were talking for tens of thousands of years before they ever started writing things down. So, if we don't have a written record of a language it is highly unlikely we will ever have a record of it at all.
Sanskrit isn't our mother tongue, but it is part of the Indo-European family. It has the same relationship to English as Russian does i.e. it shares a common root. This common language is unknown, as we have no written records of it, however by studying the relationship of cognates and sound changes, we can reconstruct elements of the proto-Indo European language. Of course, much of this is hypothetical as it cannot be 'proven' as such but it is interesting nonetheless.
However, Sanskrit is probably one of the closest Indo-European languages to the original proto Indo-European language surviving today. I've heard that Lithuanian is also very close and also some of the Slavic languages.
|
|
In vino veritas.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ
Dude, I believe its been proven that the Earth is only 5-6 thousand years old. It says so in the Bible.
And on that young earth is a bridge in Brooklyn for sale!

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: On the dancefloor, doing the boogaloo…
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ
Dude, I believe its been proven that the Earth is only 5-6 thousand years old. It says so in the Bible.
Oh yeah, sorry. My fault. 
|
If I change my way of living, and if I pave my streets with good times, will the mountain keep on giving…
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think written languages are quite a recent thing.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, UT USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
2008 iMac 3.06 Ghz, 2GB Memory, GeForce 8800, 500GB HD, SuperDrive
8gb iPhone on Tmobile
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beautiful Downtown Portland
Status:
Offline
|
|
IIRC, Basque is the only living non-proto-indo-european language. They consider it a neolithic language, unrelated to anything else on earth.
That may reflect old thinking on the subject, I haven't read up on the field in a very long time.
|
|
"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die." -- Hunter S. Thompson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by thunderous_funker
IIRC, Basque is the only living non-proto-indo-european language.
Japanese is an Indo-European language?
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Isn't this taught in school? I know I were.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beautiful Downtown Portland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Japanese is an Indo-European language?
I might have mis-remembered and my review of the Tree didn't reveal an obvious answer.
Basque is a branch all by itself, unrelated to anything else. I'm not sure what the names of the "parent" branch is but now that you mention it can't be proto-indo-european so my post would appear to be incorrect.
|
|
"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die." -- Hunter S. Thompson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by thunderous_funker
IIRC, Basque is the only living non-proto-indo-european language. They consider it a neolithic language, unrelated to anything else on earth.
That may reflect old thinking on the subject, I haven't read up on the field in a very long time.
The vast majority of languages in the world are not Indo-European! And there are many languages which we are unable to classify (especially some in Africa). So Basque is not one of a kind!
Here is a list of 'language isolates'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_isolate
|
|
In vino veritas.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by undotwa
The vast majority of languages in the world are not Indo-European! And there are many languages which we are unable to classify (especially some in Africa). So Basque is not one of a kind!
Well, it's still one of a kind (i.e. the only language in its family). It's just not the only thing that's one of a kind. That would be super-unique.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ
It says so in the Bible.
No it doesn't.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beautiful Downtown Portland
Status:
Offline
|
|
At least half my memory works right. 
|
|
"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die." -- Hunter S. Thompson
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Durham, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
You may have gotten this from the earlier links, Cody Dawg, but languages generally change into new ones gradually, and it's likely that every most extant languages descended from one original one. So we can (often) draw clear boundaries between 2 current languages, but it would be pretty much impossible to say where/when the "second" language separated from the first. Again, not that we could recreate any of the first one, but linguists seem fairly confident it existed.
John McWhorter's book The Power of Babel (here it is at Amazon) is a great layperson's book on language change and how linguistic detectives can partially reconstruct its history. His pop culture references can get a little over-the-top at times, but it's a great not-too-easy/not-too-hard read..
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
The welsh are human?
No, they are fish.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
No it doesn't.
Yeah- it kinda does.
It has genealogies going back to Adam, and it all adds up to 6k or so.
|
|
Paco is bitter about the loss of his .mac webpage. Image will return when his sadness lessens.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Well, it's still one of a kind (i.e. the only language in its family). It's just not the only thing that's one of a kind. That would be super-unique.
Oh yes, in that sense it is one of a kind!
Sorry for that slip.
|
|
In vino veritas.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Prior to the Tower of Babel, humanity spoke Hebrew. That's the truth, take it or leave it.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
What was the very first language, then the next one, and so on?
Where do Asiatic languages fit in? And native Americans and their languages?
We were talking about that this morning.
Have any ideas?
prob hand language in the form of simple jesters 
|
|
Brian says (9:16 AM): I was looking at houses in Ottawa... I actually have a temptation in me to move
Jeff ******* says (9:19 AM): Eww, Ottawa is gross. It's infested with politicians, and presently, 1 Harper as well.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cody Dawg
What was the very first language, then the next one, and so on?
Have any ideas?
Body language??? Still in use worldwide  .
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Athens
prob hand language in the form of simple jesters

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Athens
prob hand language in the form of simple jesters
Muahahahahaha. That was funny ! Maybe not intentionally, but nonetheless.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|