 |
 |
Can anyone test a program for me?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
I really think my students need more practice with radicals, so tomorrow (well, today now) we're going into the lab to work on an applet that I just wrote tonight. Can anyone tell me if there is anything seriously wrong with the program? It's not the most beautiful thing ever (one day, remember).
http://www.fahrenbacher.com/webpage/...let/index.html
Thanks!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: case.edu
Status:
Offline
|
|
Playing with it for a few minutes revealed no serious issues for me - other than I sucked at it and fired up Mathematica for help once I got to level 3 or so.
I used to be able to do that in my head, it brings back memories from algebra class... just not memories of how to do the math. 
|
pb 1440x960 | 1.67, 1.5, 128, 80 | leopard
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, I suck at math ... nice tutorial though. I'm going to break out my "... for dummies" book on the subject soon and give it another whirl.
|
|
- iMac 3.2Ghz 1TB - MacBook Pro 15" Core i7 2.3Ghz / 256SSD (Work laptop)
- PowerMac G5 - Dual 2.0 Ghz, 3GB, Soundsticks!,
- Lenovo Thinkpad T510 (also a work laptop), Win 7 Enterprise, 8GB, 320GB HDD
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Status:
Offline
|
|
haha... I remember this stuff... from like. two weeks ago. Im in Alg II... recently covered quadratic equations, completing the square, etc. But I am too lazy to do that stuff now lol.
Its usually not that difficult as long as you have a piece of paper to do factor trees (dont have a paper handy) and if you know a few of the perfect squares/prime numbers.
Correct me if im wrong but I believe this is the procedure (or at least one of them).
1) make a factor tree
2) pull out all pairs of numbers (these are the perfect squares within the #)
3) simplify them (since they are pairs, they are perfect sqaures, easy enough)
4) simplify everything thats still in the radical
so... like
200
= 2 * 100
= 2 * 2 * 50
= 2 * 2 * 2 * 25
= 2 * 2 * 2 * 5 * 5
thats one pair of 2, one pair of 5, and a single one... so
= sqrt(2 * 2) * sqrt(5 * 5) * sqrt(2)
= 2 * 5 * sqrt(2)
= 10 * sqrt(2)
...is that right?
|

"In a world without walls or fences, what need have we for windows or gates?"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yep! Another way I do it is I have my kids look for the biggest perfect square that divides it. For example, 100 is the biggest that divides 200.
So: Sqrt(200) = Sqrt(100) * Sqrt(2) = 10 * Sqrt(2).
They usually figure out the biggest p.s. by a little guess and check. It gives them some practice with recognizing what divides what, which they need.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
You're a terrific teacher, Ghoser.  The only things I would add are a direction that says "press return after entering your answer," because that may not be apparent to everyone, and a note that the asterisk symbol is used on the keyboard as the multiplier. Oh, and maybe an additional button to show the levels window.
(Last edited by Big Mac; Feb 1, 2006 at 06:26 AM.
)
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|