 |
 |
? for audio people, how much is this high end B&W item?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status:
Offline
|
|
Someone asked me but I have no idea… so here I am looking for advice since there are for sure people with good taste over here
The Nautilus from Bowers & Wilkins…

|
"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seaford, Virginia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Something that looks like that makes me wonder if you're paying for design quality or audio quality.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA - Just outside DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
or the slimey trail across the carpet...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Admin Emeritus 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by His Dudeness
Something that looks like that makes me wonder if you're paying for design quality or audio quality.
Both, but mostly the latter.
But since I assume you don't know of B&W: it's a legitimate high-end speaker company that makes superb speakers, the vast majority of them rather normal looking. The freakish shape of that speaker is basically taking B&W's signature technology and curling it up, since laid out straight it wouldn't fit in a normal room.
tooki
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status:
Offline
|
|
I picked one of those up at the beach one day...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think the name is making you think of it in higher regard, the damn thing looks like it is from a Wal-mart from the late 80s.
|
"She's gone from suck to blow!"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seaford, Virginia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by tooki
Both, but mostly the latter.
But since I assume you don't know of B&W: it's a legitimate high-end speaker company that makes superb speakers, the vast majority of them rather normal looking. The freakish shape of that speaker is basically taking B&W's signature technology and curling it up, since laid out straight it wouldn't fit in a normal room.
tooki
I've heard of B&W before. Pretty good speakers, but those are pretty hideous to look at.
I heard a home theater setup built around Definitive Technology's BP3000. Now that's a damn fine pair of speakers.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dark Helmet
I think the name is making you think of it in higher regard, the damn thing looks like it is from a Wal-mart from the late 80s.
Oh no. B&W really is GOOD. The big Nautilus is fugly but oh sooo good. The normal looking Nautilus' are incredible as well.
It's not just a name. They deliver on quality.
|

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
$40,000
http://www.exoticaudio.org/PAGE27.html
quote
"The B&W Nautilus speaker, shaped like a snails shell, the cabnet makes it posible to shrink and deminish sound vibration in a small package. About $40,000. Not bad for what some people consider the most accurate speaker made. Need tons of power, each driver can be amplified. OK?"
|
|
"It's weird the way 'finger puppets' sounds ok as a noun..."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
Oh no. B&W really is GOOD. The big Nautilus is fugly but oh sooo good. The normal looking Nautilus' are incredible as well.
It's not just a name. They deliver on quality.
I know they are good speakers, what I am saying is that they are horridly ugly.
|
"She's gone from suck to blow!"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
those speakers are proof that a fool and his money are soon parted.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dark Helmet
what I am saying is that they are horridly ugly.
True dat.
|

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Appalachia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by NYCFarmboy
those speakers are proof that a fool and his money are soon parted.
For some, $45K is nothing and they want the best sound possible. However, you can't just drop speakers like that into a average room (at least not without some serious EQ). The space is just as important as, if not more than, the equipment when you get to that level.
I've heard these in a well designed listening room, and they're really special (if not attractive), but require some very special electronics behind them to bring it all out. I think my Krells would make them sing, but I wouldn't try a run-of-the-mill consumer amp with them (probably damage the amp and maybe the speakers).
Used to own some B&Ws, and can attest to their quality (I owned a set of 803s), though I've since switched to Wilson and never looked back. 
|

Retired
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Aussie in UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I own 6 pairs of B&W's. One could say that I am very happy with the B&W sound. I am looking at building myself a nice two channel system and I am probably either going for something in the B&W Nautilus range (803's maybe) or Martin Logan (Probably the Clarity).
The major point of a speaker like the original Nautilus is to showcase a companies technology and for it to trickle down to the more realistic products in the range. The Nautilus range is basically a case study for that concept.
MacNStein - What Wilsons you got? Watt Puppys?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|