 |
 |
Microsoft bombshell: no EFI support for Vista
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chillin' at the back of the Falcon
Status:
Offline
|
|
"Microsoft revealed today that it will not support EFI booting for Windows Vista on its launch. The news will be a shock for owners of Intel Macs who had hoped they would be able to dual-boot between Windows Vista and OS X. Intel Macs only support booting via EFI."
http://apcmag.com/apc/v3.nsf/0/E666E...25712C008166C4
|

"Barwaraaawww"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wait, Longhorn will be missing a feature it was supposed to have? NO WAI!!1!
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 127.0.0.1
Status:
Offline
|
|
So much for dual-booting an Intel Mac. Time to get WINE to step up to the plate.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Already a thread on this.
The real bomb isn't that Vista won't have EFI at launch, it's that there will never be EFI support in the 32-bit version.
Perhaps Apple caught wind of this, and that's why they disabled the legacy compatibility mode on the Intel Macs?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think Apple wants to make Windows booting too tough, just tough enough that your mom won't want to do it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Of course, your mom is willing to do anything!
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I did go there.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Of course, your mom is willing to do anything!
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I did go there.
I should send you a photo of my mom.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
lets see if Mr. Dog thinks this thread is meaningful.
ok, apparently not.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
This may be the nicest thing M$ has ever done for Apple. Kudos, M$.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
I don't think Apple wants to make Windows booting too tough, just tough enough that your mom won't want to do it.
Why would MS care what computer Windows runs on? They aren't a hardware company. They'd make Windows work on a toaster if they think people would use it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Except of Mac booting, what would be the incentive for Microsoft to support EFI? What for did Intel invent this technology?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Except of Mac booting, what would be the incentive for Microsoft to support EFI? What for did Intel invent this technology?
The PC platform is expected to use EFI beginning in 2H 2007.
Sort of pointless for Microsoft to implement a feature before any of their customers can use it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
I don't think Apple wants to make Windows booting too tough, just tough enough that your mom won't want to do it.
I disagree. Apple still considers itself a hardware company, even though the userbase buys it almost entirely for either the software or a combination of the two. Apple isn't stupid; they know that people come for the software. But rather than converting to a software-based business model, they prefer to keep the ultra-high profit margins on hardware, and the only way to do that is by making sure you're locked into Apple hardware if you want to use Apple software.
(Last edited by Millennium; Mar 10, 2006 at 10:48 AM.
)
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Not surprising.
I mean, let's be real, most of the Mac users who would run Vista on their Macs would probably use a pirated version, only few would buy Visa for that. So M$ is not losing lots of money with this move. Financially, there was not incentive to make it happen, so they didn't.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
from: http://www.nytimes.com/cnet/CNET_210...3-6048250.html
No Vista on Mac's horizon
Ina Fried, for News.com
Published: March 9, 2006
SAN FRANCISCO--Hoping your Intel Mac will easily run Windows Vista?
Don't bet on it, one Apple Computer engineer said Thursday.
Mac fans have held out considerable hope that the next version of Windows would be easier to load on Macs than Windows XP, because like Mac OS X, Vista will use Extensible Firmware Interface (EFI) to aid the boot process. Older versions of Windows have used Basic Input Output System (BIOS).
In more bad news for the Vista-on-Mac crowd, Microsoft reportedly told another IDF session on Thursday that the initial release of Vista won't be supporting EFI at all.
------------------------------------------
what I like about this article is the grave dissapointment it ascribes to Mac users that they won't be able to use Windows on their machines. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chillin' at the back of the Falcon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
I don't think Apple wants to make Windows booting too tough, just tough enough that your mom won't want to do it.
Apple didn't tell MS NOT to make it compatible 
|

"Barwaraaawww"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
The real bomb isn't that Vista won't have EFI at launch, it's that there will never be EFI support in the 32-bit version.
Another reason to wait for that Merom 13" MacBook Pro and that Conroe iMac.
By that time, Photoshop and Office for Mac OS X Intel might actually be available too.
Perhaps Apple caught wind of this, and that's why they disabled the legacy compatibility mode on the Intel Macs?
Nah, they didn't implement it because there is no reason for Apple to implement it. From Apple's point of view, why bother?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chillin' at the back of the Falcon
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|

"Barwaraaawww"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here's another take: Given that Apple is the only one mandating EFI with 32-bit chips, is it really any surprise that MS isn't supporting it?
EFI is already supported in all MS's 64-bit OSs (XP x64, 2003 x64, 2003 IA64) and will be support in Vista x64; is enabling and testing EFI support for 32-bit machines worth the effort for such a small slice of the market (Mac owners who want to boot Windows)? Microsoft says no.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|