Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Men's File: Russian Math Wizard Devises Formula How Shoe Size Relates to Pecker Size

Men's File: Russian Math Wizard Devises Formula How Shoe Size Relates to Pecker Size
Thread Tools
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 05:50 AM
 
Men's File: Russian Math Wizard Devises Formula How Shoe Size Relates to Pecker Size

Russian Mathematicians Create A Formula Linking Shoe Size To Cronk Size

We’ve all heard the stories that your SHOE SIZE is directly connected to your CRONK SIZE...and , honestly, for some of us with gargantuan feet, we’ve CLUNG to it forever. Of course, it usually gets written off as myth.

NOT SO, say a group of Russian mathematicians. They’ve created a formula that links a man’s shoe size to his penis length. AND...they say it’s accurate on 90% of men!!!

The formula: Manhood size equals height plus five, all divided by two. Unfortunately, the formula uses the metric system...which, yes, I know, is evil...so you’ll need to know your shoe size to centimeters. Fortunately...I’ve done that for you...and, in the process, figured out your size in the pants. Here you go...

...Shoe size EIGHT means a 5.98-inch cronk.

...Shoe size NINE means a 6.14-inch cronk.

...Shoe size TEN means a 6.3-inch cronk.

...Shoe size ELEVEN means a 6.48-inch cronk.

...Shoe size TWELVE means a 6.65-inch cronk.

...And shoe size THIRTEEN means a 6.8-inch cronk. (Pravda)
But, it's not how much you have, but how well you use it!

Practice safe sex.
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 05:57 AM
 
Are these US, European or UK sizes, UK sizes tend to be a lot bigger than Euro sizes as they have much larger feet in the UK on average.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 06:30 AM
 
This isn't true, according to my Cronk.

But I may be the other 10%
     
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 06:34 AM
 
Size 10.5 should be 8-inch
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 06:36 AM
 
Odd thing is that most tall men have big feet and small peckerydoos. There is no bone in the penis as we boys once answered a girl in biology class when we were 14.
Anyone who denies climate changes naturally is a Climate Change Skeptic.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Frickersville
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 06:42 AM
 
i've been with several guys that disprove this forumla. unfortunately for me, it wasn't their shoe size which was small...

Mystical, magical, amazing! | Part 2 | The spread of Christianity is our goal. -Railroader
     
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 08:49 AM
 
So we are talking about less than one inch?
Thats already the difference between being with a 80-70-80 and a 95-55-105 (in cm )
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 09:57 AM
 
Cronk?



     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 10:33 AM
 
Well, I wear a size 12 1/2(US). Maybe later when I get home I'll see if I also have a 6.7" thingamadoodle.

I'll be sure to report back with my findings.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 12:38 PM
 
Originally Posted by Person Man
Cronk?


Fixed
Midshipman 3/C, USNR
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 12:46 PM
 
Originally Posted by Mister Elf


Fixed
That works, too, but I was referring to that character's name, Kronk. He's from Disney's "The Emperor's New Groove"
     
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 01:26 PM
 
Size 15. w00t.
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 01:32 PM
 
I wear size 22 1/2 shoes..






Too bad my feet don't fill them up.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 01:46 PM
 
What if your 'cronk' is bigger than your shoe size?

And is there a way of measuring a woman's, uhm, depth, based on shoe sizes converted to negatives using quadratics or something?
I've noticed that with small-footed women, it's like packing too much baloney in the zip-loc, ya know what I mean? wink wink nudge nudge.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 01:56 PM
 
Erm. Ok.


As another poster stated, I've been with many men where this formula does NOT apply at all, including myself.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 02:39 PM
 
Originally Posted by osiris
What if your 'cronk' is bigger than your shoe size?

And is there a way of measuring a woman's, uhm, depth, based on shoe sizes converted to negatives using quadratics or something?
I've noticed that with small-footed women, it's like packing too much baloney in the zip-loc, ya know what I mean? wink wink nudge nudge.
Invest in a shoehorn.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 02:48 PM
 
If a man has a big fast car as a, um, cronk substitute, does it work the same way that a woman with a big garage is making up for something?

Look after my manor, or I will bum you, literally, to death.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 03:36 PM
 
Well I'll be damned. Looks like the formula is correct.

I just finished measuring my willy and it looks like it's just over 6.5" in circumference.

That's pretty close to the 6.7" predicted using the shoe size formula.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 03:49 PM
 
wow, so the difference is barely an inch going from size 8 shoes to size 13 shoes? so like .5" from the average size? (assuming that this was the tested range)

i dunno, this isn't really all that amazing to me. seems logical that the height and build differences in general scale of a person with size 8 feet and someone with size 13 feet would correlate with a general upsizing of all factors of a person. granted there are anomalies, but 1" of difference seems like logical to me.

90% is what? 3 standard deviations?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 03:50 PM
 
Originally Posted by Spliffdaddy
I just finished measuring my willy and it looks like it's just over 6.5" in circumference.
It's cronk. Get it straight. Not willy, cronk, CRONK!!!
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 03:51 PM
 
bah
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 04:00 PM
 
Oh! the formula says 6.7" in length - not circumference.

I measured in the wrong direction.

Hold on a second, let me find the yardstick.

.
.
.
.
hmmm. Looks like 11 5/8ths

flacid.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 04:13 PM
 
^^
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Mar 13, 2006, 05:03 PM
 


-t
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 06:33 PM
 
Originally Posted by what_the_heck


-t
Hmmm, you know what it takes to satisfy a big P----?

Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 06:50 PM
 
Not true.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 07:04 PM
 
Originally Posted by kernokerno
Not true.
Is true.
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 07:24 PM
 
More silly nonsense. IIRC, about a hundred years ago, someone postulated that humans who had bigger heads (not that kind; get your mind out of the gutter), were more intelligent, which of course is just as silly.

BTW, the word is "penis," and you can really use it without giggling (at least some of us can).
Why is there always money for war, but none for education?
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 07:26 PM
 
Heh you said penis.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 07:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by KarlG
More silly nonsense. IIRC, about a hundred years ago, someone postulated that humans who had bigger heads (not that kind; get your mind out of the gutter), were more intelligent, which of course is just as silly.

BTW, the word is "penis," and you can really use it without giggling (at least some of us can).
Brain size actually is pretty highly correlated with IQ. Don't know about head size though. Or "head" size for that matter.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 07:42 PM
 
Originally Posted by KarlG
BTW, the word is "penis," and you can really use it without giggling (at least some of us can).
It's CRONK, goddammit!
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 09:22 PM
 
Originally Posted by aberdeenwriter
Is true.
really?
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Mar 13, 2006, 10:55 PM
 
Originally Posted by Albert Pujols
I wear size 22 1/2 shoes..






Too bad my feet don't fill them up.
You may not be aware of this, but you're sitting or standing on my feet right now. Oh, and don't look over your shoulder.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 12:30 AM
 
Crud, I'm 13 and I have shoe size 6... No wonder!
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chillin' at the back of the Falcon
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 12:36 AM
 
Originally Posted by ambush
Size 10.5 should be 8-inch
I was wondering how long it would take you.

Seems you are still a growing boy. The last 10 times you brought it up it was 7.5

"Barwaraaawww"
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Denton, TX
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 03:12 AM
 
What if I wear a size 15 shoe on my cronk?
"This show is filmed before a live studio audience as soon as someone removes that dead guy!" - Stephen Colbert
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 05:44 AM
 
Originally Posted by I Bent My Wookiee
I was wondering how long it would take you.

Seems you are still a growing boy. The last 10 times you brought it up it was 7.5
I was thinking the same thing.

But I figured if I replied to him, he would post again.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Mar 14, 2006, 08:51 AM
 
Originally Posted by I Bent My Wookiee
I was wondering how long it would take you.
Seems you are still a growing boy. The last 10 times you brought it up it was 7.5
Hey, no snide remarks about his Canadian quality penis

-t
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 09:00 AM
 
This is definitely making for good conversation.

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Mar 14, 2006, 09:07 AM
 
Originally Posted by wdlove
This is definitely making for good conversation.
At church ?

-t
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 09:25 AM
 
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Mar 14, 2006, 10:34 AM
 
Well, THIS is my show. Go figure



-t
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 10:37 AM
 
Too bad I only understand metric.

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Mar 14, 2006, 10:39 AM
 
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
Too bad I only understand metric.
Yeah. metric system is much gooder.
See, a 20 cm dick sounds much bigger than 8 inch

-t
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chillin' at the back of the Falcon
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 10:39 AM
 
Ya from the number of penis' I have seen this chart is 100% wrong unless everyone I see falls into the 10%

"Barwaraaawww"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Mar 14, 2006, 10:40 AM
 
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chillin' at the back of the Falcon
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 10:41 AM
 
Ya from the number of penis' I have seen this chart is 100% wrong unless everyone I see falls into the 10%

"Barwaraaawww"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Mar 14, 2006, 10:41 AM
 
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status: Offline
Mar 14, 2006, 10:45 AM
 
forum burp?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Online
Mar 14, 2006, 10:54 AM
 
Originally Posted by Binarymix
forum burp?
Yep.

-t
     
 
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2