Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > "State-Sponsored Piracy"

"State-Sponsored Piracy"
Thread Tools
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 24, 2006, 08:28 AM
 
Link

Apple is kidding right?
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 24, 2006, 08:35 AM
 
Nope, they're not. And in a way I agree with Apple. Of course it's extremely easy to get around the limits placed on music content by the iTunes-iPod linkage, but with those limits at least Apple shows an attempt to prevent pirate music distribution. By delinking them, Apple's DRM becomes irrelevant, Apple would probably have to add other types of DRM handling to the iPod, and chaos would ensue (at least at the market level).

I can also see the point France is making. They're equating the iTunes-iPod linkage with the Windows-Internet Explorer linkage that the EU sued Microsoft over-and won.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 24, 2006, 08:50 AM
 
Why would they be kidding?

The music companies will begin to withhold music if their music isn't protected. If the law passes, I simply see the French iTMS either closing or being reduced to a fraction of what it currently is.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 24, 2006, 09:07 AM
 
I think a better law would be so that Apple doesn't have to give up the DRM. It could just licence it to Samsung or Creative or whatever.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 24, 2006, 09:07 AM
 
But the music is still being protected. It just won't be limited artificially the way Apple wants it to be. You're right that it might be lost market share. So what? This is about the rights of the consumers.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 24, 2006, 09:25 AM
 
Originally Posted by demograph68
But the music is still being protected.
They've already had a difficult time protecting their files from the Hymn project. If they're forced to give people the code to crack FairPlay, the word "protection" is kind of stretching it.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 24, 2006, 10:03 AM
 
The music companies will begin to withhold music if their music isn't protected.
I doubt it. There's probably enough money to be made in the French market that they would cave. In any event, why shouldn't the French get to regulate business within their borders, and decide on their own copyright laws?

That said, I think the proposed reforms are bad, but only because there's a lot of other stuff riding along with this which is considerably worse. The DRM thing though? It's nothing. I wholly favor wiping out DRM everywhere.
--
This and all my other posts are hereby in the public domain. I am a lawyer. But I'm not your lawyer, and this isn't legal advice.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2