Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > True or False

True or False
Thread Tools
abe
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 03:28 AM
 
People who have endured more stuff find more things humorous. True or false?
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 03:33 AM
 
True
we don't have time to stop for gas
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 03:39 AM
 
When you're talking about human emotions there is no true or false. Some people may have the ability to find humour in more situations after enduring x number of events while others may lose their sense of humour entirely.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 03:48 AM
 
Not categorically true.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
abe  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 04:00 AM
 
Originally Posted by gradient
When you're talking about human emotions there is no true or false. Some people may have the ability to find humour in more situations after enduring x number of events while others may lose their sense of humour entirely.
While I can think of at least one example of each, I wonder if one or the other would represent a very small minority if there were a census of these populations.
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 04:11 AM
 
People who have more experience in life are more likely to find things funny, I guess. I'm not sure it's necessary for the experience to be overwhelmingly negative.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 04:28 AM
 
Originally Posted by abe
While I can think of at least one example of each, I wonder if one or the other would represent a very small minority if there were a census of these populations.
Granted I picked a somewhat extreme example as far as losing your sense of humour entirely but my point is that the question was an absolute one - true or false - which is just not valid given the varying nature of human emotions.
     
abe  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 05:08 AM
 
Originally Posted by gradient
Granted I picked a somewhat extreme example as far as losing your sense of humour entirely but my point is that the question was an absolute one - true or false - which is just not valid given the varying nature of human emotions.
No. Just because the varying nature of human responses might make it difficult to guess accurately and because the statistical evidence may not exist or be readily available to us, here, that is not to say that an absolute majority doesn't exist.

There's no way to know for certain and you just have no feel for it, one way or the other. And so that makes you unwilling to guess.

I think the more difficult times a person goes through it makes them better appreciate the humor in this life.

I think there are people who are broken by their experience but that, given time, many of them will recover from their pain and as they think about life they will find more things funny and fewer things about themselves (at least) to be serious about.

I think it's TRUE.
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 09:04 AM
 
I hate generalizations, all of them

-t
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 10:57 AM
 
Originally Posted by what_the_heck
I hate generalizations, all of them

-t
You should never use generalization and absolutes because they are always wrong.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 12:29 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
You should never use generalization and absolutes because they are always wrong.
Exactly.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 12:58 PM
 
I don't know, but I guess it makes sense. If you've been through tough times, you'll appreciate the little funny things in life more.

However, my guess is that sense of humor is largely unchangeable, and a fundamental part of your personality that is less affected by experience and more by genetics.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 01:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by abe
No. Just because the varying nature of human responses might make it difficult to guess accurately and because the statistical evidence may not exist or be readily available to us, here, that is not to say that an absolute majority doesn't exist.

There's no way to know for certain and you just have no feel for it, one way or the other. And so that makes you unwilling to guess.
We're not talking about absolute majorities, we're talking about absolutes - two very different things. If the question had been "People who have endured more stuff are more likely to find more things humorous. True or False?" I would without have to answer 'true' even though my personal experiences are to the contrary. But that was not the question and my personal experiences (and my own sense of humour as a result of them) make me 100% certain that there is no correct answer to the posed question.

Saying that I have no 'feel' for the question isn't accurate at all.

Let's see how many threads we can disagree in today!!
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 04:09 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
You should never use generalization and absolutes because they are always wrong.
Yes, ALL generalizations and ALL absolutes are ALWAYS wrong, no exception. Evar.

[/irony]

-t
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 04:28 PM
 
Originally Posted by gradient
We're not talking about absolute majorities, we're talking about absolutes
Actually, we're talking about a generality. He did not say "all people." He just said "people." It could mean all people, or it could mean people in general.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 04:45 PM
 
Originally Posted by abe
People who have endured more stuff find more things humorous. True or false?
It's so funny to put things in white and black. Real life doesn't work that way however.

People find things funny for their own reasons, and that may have nothing to do with what they endured, or the quantity of things they had to endure.

You can endured a lot, but unless you have resolved how they affected you, there is no way to tell if that person is still traumatized/depressed by those.

Most people who find things humorous, from my experience, are people who lead simple lives, with not much complications, and most and foremost, because they don't want to make it more complicated.

There is probably a inverse correlation between IQ and sense of humour. The higher the IQ, the less less they find things funny. Age is also a factor, but how determinant it can be I am not so sure.
You live more in 5 minutes on a bike like this, going flat-out, than some people in their lifetime

- Burt
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 04:58 PM
 
Originally Posted by FeLiZeCaT
There is probably a inverse correlation between IQ and sense of humour. The higher the IQ, the less less they find things funny. Age is also a factor, but how determinant it can be I am not so sure.
Hmm, that's depressing, not least because I find lots of things very, very funny.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 05:05 PM
 
Does having an offbeat sense of humor mean you have a strange IQ?
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 05:30 PM
 
Originally Posted by what_the_heck
Yes, ALL generalizations and ALL absolutes are ALWAYS wrong, no exception. Evar.

[/irony]

-t
Do I have to add /SARCASM] tags to my post so you understand it?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 05:40 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
You should never use generalization and absolutes because they are always wrong.
|1 + 1| = 2
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 05:42 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
Do I have to add /SARCASM] tags to my post so you understand it?
With some people here, I'm not sure...

-t
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 05:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by FeLiZeCaT
There is probably a inverse correlation between IQ and sense of humour. The higher the IQ, the less less they find things funny.
I haven't found this to be the case at all. My IQ is higher than 60 and I find almost everything funny. My guitarist's IQ is lower than 50 and he shares pretty much the same sense of humour (albeit with a greater proportion of toilet jokes).

I have, however, noticed a correlation between political opinion and humour. That is, the left tends to be more humourless than the right. Note that this is simply personal observation, not absolute fact... ...basically, every leftie I know is a humourless moron. Of course, some right-leaning folks I know are also humourless morons, but the frequency of occurrence is nowhere near that of the left. Note also that this is probably limited to the UK and doesn't apply to the US, as your Democrat party is still to the right of our furthest right party.

(Note: This is not intended to take the thread into political territory. Simply an observation about humour).
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Live at the BBQ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 07:21 PM
 
people are not monolithic, binary machinations. Our behaviour and the reasonings behind it (conscious or unconscious) are influenced by an unlimited number of factors. It is extremely complex and well beyond our ability to fully understand. In my opinion, these binary perspectives on human behaviour only seem to be an attempt to simplify it, because real analysis of complex phenomena takes too much effort.
"Bill Gates can't guarantee Windows... how can you guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 07:55 PM
 
People with more life experience, good and bad, who manage to adapt and adjust to that experience tend to see more humor in life than those who do not adapt and adjust.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 08:17 PM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon
|1 + 1| = 2
Do people not understand jokes around here anymore?
     
abe  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 08:36 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
Do people not understand jokes around here anymore?
I think you are maybe starting to see signs of some folks' fuzziness. But, they really can't help themselves.
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 08:41 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader
Do people not understand jokes around here anymore?
Read my post a few up from this for the answer to that one.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2006, 09:06 PM
 
Abe, Doofy. I understand.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2006, 12:27 AM
 
Maybe.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2006, 06:45 AM
 
Originally Posted by BRussell
Hmm, that's depressing, not least because I find lots of things very, very funny.
You must have, like, the weirdest IQ.

You live more in 5 minutes on a bike like this, going flat-out, than some people in their lifetime

- Burt
     
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2006, 06:52 AM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy
I haven't found this to be the case at all. My IQ is higher than 60 and I find almost everything funny. My guitarist's IQ is lower than 50 and he shares pretty much the same sense of humour (albeit with a greater proportion of toilet jokes).
Well, I did say "the less less" didn't I?



I have, however, noticed a correlation between political opinion and humour. That is, the left tends to be more humourless than the right. Note that this is simply personal observation, not absolute fact... ...basically, every leftie I know is a humourless moron. Of course, some right-leaning folks I know are also humourless morons, but the frequency of occurrence is nowhere near that of the left. Note also that this is probably limited to the UK and doesn't apply to the US, as your Democrat party is still to the right of our furthest right party.

(Note: This is not intended to take the thread into political territory. Simply an observation about humour).
You, know, what do I know? To each his experience, and whatever they do about it, right? Having a sense of humour is not a monopoly owned by anyone, even if some seem to be slower to either get it, or much quicker, or sensitive than ourselves to get it.

And there's the fact that not everyone laugh at the same thing. I know there are things I find funny that others find boring (the Jack Bauer thread I find funny, but I get bored watching a chaplin movie, even though I can appreciate it. Sometimes, and maybe I confused IQ and the fact that people who are blasé and cynical are not as happy, and therefore, not so inclined to find things humourous.
You live more in 5 minutes on a bike like this, going flat-out, than some people in their lifetime

- Burt
     
abe  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2006, 09:11 PM
 
With all due respect to any and all who addressed the issue of sense of humor and IQ, that wasn't the initial proposition.
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 30, 2006, 10:45 PM
 
Yes.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2