 |
 |
Who'd win a fight?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK, so who'd win a fight:
Chuck Norris, Jack Bauer, or Mike Ditka?
|
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Westside Island
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ditka.
Bill Swerski: Okay, gentlemen, another scenario: Da Bears, they don't make it, the plane is delayed.. and the only one who shows up is Ditka. Ditka vs. Da Giants. Okay, score, gentlemen.
Pat Arnold: Alright, after da heart attack, I gotta say Ditka 17, Giants 14. He just barely gets by.
Bill Swerski: Alright, that sounds exciting. Perhaps, you know, a late Ditka field goal.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Every one vs. Ditka.
Ditka.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Jack Bauer commands an awesome team of loyalists which magnifies his power and when you think of Jack you have to consider his OVER ALL effect, that effect made up of all his assets.
It would be like taking away Chuck Norris' martial arts ability. When you think of him, you assume he will be using all his usual assets.
But mano a mano with no other PEOPLE around to rely on (which would place Jack under a considerable handicap), I think Chuck Norris has the edge. Although Jack is smarter and more resourceful and a darker character which means he could surprise Norris, who should be expected to go for a quick take down or submission hold.
But DITKA has it all over both of the others. Thus, he shouldn't even be considered.
So, in a match between Jack and Chuck, with no handicaps imposed, I'd take Jack.
Mano a mano, with no electronic devices or guns, it's Chuck.
I voted for Jack.
With MAJOR props to Chloe O'Brian.
|
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|