 |
 |
Lite version for PCs?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Would it be silly by Apple to create a kind of lite version of Mac OSX to be run on non-apple hardware? I beleive Dell might love it
The idea raises some questions, though: How lite should it be? Would it be guaranteed to work as good as on a Mac? Would it really make Win-users switch? Which apps should be delivered with it?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Portugal
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think it's silly, apple gets more revenue from selling hardware than from the software sales (correct me if I'm wrong).
I think only supporting Apple's hardware is one of the reasons that OS X (or any Mac OS for that matter), is so stable. So I think it would be a bad move to support other hardware, but with this PPC/intel/Bootcamp thing you never know 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
There's no way to make a Mac OS X Lite Edition that would not suck. And releasing the full version for general PCs would cause Apple's hardware sales (the core of its business) to die a quick death. So, I don't think it's feasible.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
What would be lite about it? seriously what feature would you recommend that apple drop?
Its a dangerious path that apple is navigating right now as it transitions to a new platform. They need to keep their installed base happy and increase new customers.
Now if they offered OSX [lite] for non-apple hardware what motivation would there be to buy apple hardware. If its truly lite what motivation would it be for people to buy it and install no a dell?
Its a lose-lose proposition IMHO
Mike
|
~Mike
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Maflynn
What would be lite about it? seriously what feature would you recommend that apple drop?
Of course an amputated version would not impress the 'super users', but things like the Finder behaviour, Widgets and Search could impress many. Even a one generation old version of iPhoto, GarageBand etc. - I mean, the lite version could lay somewhat behind!
On the lite version there could also be som fancy Flash laying on the Dock. This Flash could tell about the total brilliantness of the full fledged OSX.
Short: The primary goal of the lite version should be to market 'the real thingo'.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is more like a Lounge discussion, moving …
|
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Maflynn
What would be lite about it? seriously what feature would you recommend that apple drop?
Its a dangerious path that apple is navigating right now as it transitions to a new platform. They need to keep their installed base happy and increase new customers.
Now if they offered OSX [lite] for non-apple hardware what motivation would there be to buy apple hardware. If its truly lite what motivation would it be for people to buy it and install no a dell?
Its a lose-lose proposition IMHO
Mike
I've thought about this a LONG time. Here are my thoughts:
- Limit the number of applications that can run. 3-4 max would be annoying.
- Limit the dock to only Apple applications.
- Obviously only one CPU
I agree that this would probably erode the iMac/iBook/mini sales.
That being said, it would be interesting to offer a "have a taste" DVD that would let you boot the OS from the DVD to give it a try... I think it would be very popular.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Torgeir
Of course an amputated version would not impress the 'super users.
I think it would pretty much not impress most users. Why buy a crippled OS, just so it can run on non-apple hardware?
So far with reading this thread I have not found any reason why this would be a good idea.
|
~Mike
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status:
Offline
|
|
No, a lite os would be incredibly stupid.
|
"She's gone from suck to blow!"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northern California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sounds like you're describing a "OS X Demo". That would be truly interesting... but I don't think it's a good idea.
|
Mac OS X 10.5.0, Mac Pro 2.66GHz/2 GB RAM/X1900 XT, 23" ACD
esdesign
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
A live DVD might not be too bad, but I don't see regular users going through the hassle of installing an OS just to get a crippled OS they will eventually have to struggle with and become annoyed by.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
A DVD (or downloadable file) that shows everything that is better would be a good idea.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|