Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Another Apple site oops

Another Apple site oops
Thread Tools
Baninated
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: An asteroid remanent of Tatooine.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 5, 2006, 09:16 AM
 
http://www.ipodhub.net/articles/2006...cs_leaked.html



What is it doing on the iPod site anyway ??
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 5, 2006, 09:29 AM
 
Freaky

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 5, 2006, 11:01 AM
 
I'm skeptical of the claim that the MacBook will only have 10/100 ethernet... with gigabit built into the chipset, Apple would have to intentionally disable it in the driver.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 5, 2006, 11:13 AM
 
They were just testing the link on a part of the site no-one would go to, like the iPod page...

errmmmm!!

Look after my manor, or I will bum you, literally, to death.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 5, 2006, 11:14 AM
 
Originally Posted by mduell
I'm skeptical of the claim that the MacBook will only have 10/100 ethernet... with gigabit built into the chipset, Apple would have to intentionally disable it in the driver.
They already do that with VGA desktop spanning support.

That said...

UPDATE: Correction, our Californian spy said the MacBook would have Gigabit Ethernet not 10/100BASE-T. Also an error on Apple's iPod page today made mention of the MacBook. Apple has now restored the page but this is what it looked like...
     
Baninated
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: An asteroid remanent of Tatooine.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 5, 2006, 11:35 AM
 
Originally Posted by ajprice
They were just testing the link on a part of the site no-one would go to, like the iPod page...

errmmmm!!

Remember when the G5 specs leaked way back when. Jobs said on stage it was on purpose to tease us. Now iPod is the most popular part of their site so why make a mistake like that there unless they want to tease us?
     
baw
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 5, 2006, 12:03 PM
 
for integrated graphics!

ick
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Urbandale, IA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 5, 2006, 12:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by Obi Wan's Ghost
Remember when the G5 specs leaked way back when. Jobs said on stage it was on purpose to tease us. Now iPod is the most popular part of their site so why make a mistake like that there unless they want to tease us?
Jobs never said it was on purpose to tease us. He said that was one of the possibilities being kicked around by the people who were discussing the specs online. It was just a mistake.
"Yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 04:04 PM
 
Well the rumour is that the new MacBooks are coming out on Tuesday... I'm looking forward to seeing whether or not I'll be buying one of these or waiting for Merom...
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 04:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by Oneota
Jobs never said it was on purpose to tease us. He said that was one of the possibilities being kicked around by the people who were discussing the specs online. It was just a mistake.
I really don't see how these gaffes can be "mistakes". For a company as big as Apple's, they should have multiple staging servers to make sure something is working fine before it goes live. It is probably just Apple feeding the hype machine.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Urbandale, IA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 05:41 PM
 
Originally Posted by Agasthya
I really don't see how these gaffes can be "mistakes". For a company as big as Apple's, they should have multiple staging servers to make sure something is working fine before it goes live. It is probably just Apple feeding the hype machine.
I'm sure they do have staging servers - but they've also got a hundred localizations of the site, probably hundreds of people working on the site (total), and any number of opportunities for someone to screw up and hit the wrong button. I mean, you've got the hardware product pages, software product pages, store pages, support pages...that's a lot of chances to make the wrong CSS file live early, or whatever.
"Yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 07:28 PM
 
MacBook? What a great secret new product no one knew was coming!!!




I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 07:31 PM
 
still, my bet is that the name stays iBooks. jobs named it like the iMac and iPod...

The rich are cheap. That's how they got rich.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 09:50 PM
 
I call bull-excriment. No way Apple is daft enough to use Intel's crap integrated graphics chipset after the consistent negative reaction it received in the Mac mini. That chipset is *way* inferior than the ATi 9550 in current iBooks.

V
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 10:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by voodoo
I call bull-excriment. No way Apple is daft enough to use Intel's crap integrated graphics chipset after the consistent negative reaction it received in the Mac mini. That chipset is *way* inferior than the ATi 9550 in current iBooks.

V
IMHO, the integrateg graphics is perfectly acceptable.

Most of what Dell is offering in that price range also uses integrated graphics. Also, this system is a low end system. I'll be happy to see a serious CPU in the iBook or MacBook. The current G4 is a joke (and YES, I own a current iBook... and LOVE IT, but it's a little sad when it struggles with iLife apps.)
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 10:15 PM
 
Originally Posted by production_coordinator
IMHO, the integrateg graphics is perfectly acceptable.

Most of what Dell is offering in that price range also uses integrated graphics. Also, this system is a low end system. I'll be happy to see a serious CPU in the iBook or MacBook. The current G4 is a joke (and YES, I own a current iBook... and LOVE IT, but it's a little sad when it struggles with iLife apps.)


Dell has nothing to do with Macs and if you think the integrated Intel grapics chipset is perfectly acceptable but you aren't pleased with the current graphics performance in the iBooks...?

The difference between the Intel chipset and the ATi 9200 was somewhat, but could be brushed away if you weren't into any serious 3D performance demanding apps, but the difference between the Intel set and the ATi 9550 is akin to the G3 and G5.

The iBook is not low end in the same sense that the Mac mini is low end.

PS. I have the current iBook too and I wouldn't have bought it if it hadn't had the 9550. It was the absolute lowest end chipset I could justify spending money on in 2006.

V
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 6, 2006, 11:57 PM
 
That's it. I had it with Apple.

-t
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2006, 12:10 AM
 
Originally Posted by what_the_heck
That's it. I had it with Apple.

-t
Over a product that hasn't even been announced...
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2006, 12:35 AM
 
Originally Posted by Salty
Over a product that hasn't even been announced...
No, that stupid mistake, putting the MacBook link on the iPod site.

Unacceptable. Seriously.

-t
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 7, 2006, 12:40 AM
 
I guess we'll know on Tuesday.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2