Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > SGI folds

SGI folds
Thread Tools
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 09:22 AM
 
Saw this note. While it has been in the air for some time, it's still a bit sad.

I wonder... is there anything to gain for Apple to buy any part of SGI? Do they still have those OpenGL patents, or did they sell them all to MS? Might XFS be worth a dime or two?
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 09:27 AM
 
So sad. I cut my teeth on an Iris 4D/70GT back in college. Working with Alias and a UNIX environment that wasn't black and white was so nice. It's a shame to see SGI go down like that
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 10:30 AM
 
I started a thread about this 2 years ago knowing it was coming soon enough.

Never used one but I guess it is their own fault for not keeping up with cheap PC's with equal power.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 10:57 AM
 
Well, Apple was sort of in the same boat.
The iPod proved to be an incredible life-saver for Apple. Without it, I'm not sure if they'd be where they are now...

-t
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 11:01 AM
 
Originally Posted by what_the_heck
Well, Apple was sort of in the same boat.
The iPod proved to be an incredible life-saver for Apple. Without it, I'm not sure if they'd be where they are now...

-t
the iMac and OSX was the life saver. The iPod is gravy.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Landlockinated
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 11:10 AM
 
I'm a bit sad, but not surprised by this news.
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 11:20 AM
 
Originally Posted by what_the_heck
Well, Apple was sort of in the same boat.
The iPod proved to be an incredible life-saver for Apple. Without it, I'm not sure if they'd be where they are now...

-t
I don't agree, either. iPod has proven to be a huge cash cow, and great for image (e.g. introducing people to the Apple ethos), but Macs are still critical.

I actually think SGI has lost a lot to Apple since OS X. Windows has always had trouble competing with UNIX workstations -- it's taken a LONG time for NT/2000/XP to dethrone the UNIX workstations.

Then Apple waltzed in with Mac OS X, and literally instantly became the #1 UNIX vendor in the world. The combination of good CPUs (mostly the G5) with a true UNIX under the hood meant that custom apps from SGI and Sun machines could be moved to a Mac that costs 1/3 as much, yet can also run everyday apps (like MS Office) that typically had to be done on a Windows PC sitting next to the workstation.

Sun has managed to stay afloat by concentrating on high-availability servers, and mostly dropping graphics. Now that Macs and Wintel PCs both have graphics comparable to SGI, and Apple has UNIX, SGI has nothing really making it stand out.

Still sad, though. SGI was way ahead of its time in years past.

tooki
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 12:36 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dark Helmet
the iMac and OSX was the life saver. The iPod is gravy.
Nah, I'm not sure about this.

I don't underestimate the good rap that Apple gtes from the iPOds. We have seen in the past that just the superior product doesn't equate in market success. What makes Apple successful now is to a big extent that people think it's a cool company, a cool brand. The technical superiority alone would NOT appeal to many.

-t
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 12:37 PM
 
Originally Posted by what_the_heck
Nah, I'm not sure about this.-t
Apple was profitable before the ipod hit. the iPod has also not brought droves of PC users over to Mac.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 12:41 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dark Helmet
Apple was profitable before the ipod hit. the iPod has also not brought droves of PC users over to Mac.
True, but even proftiabe doesn't necessary mean a lot.
M$ is as profitable as never before, for years, and still almost dead. Stock went sideways for years. M$ Visat doesn't get anywhere. Nothing happening.

-t
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 01:13 PM
 
Well, Chapter 11 bankruptcy is to allow the entity to reorganize and restructure its assets under court protection or supervision.

It's not over unless they announce a Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which is used for liquidation.

Once that happens I would ask any fellow mate over here to rent a truck and drive it to Mountain View… then just pick up some Tezro workstations, I will give you the address to ship them later

In a nutshell, Chapter 11 gives SGI a chance to live to fight another day, not a better scenario being honest.

So even when it doesn't make any sense to say now how powerful they were or how good IRIX was… I blame on SGI because they didn't allow to keep the dream alive, maybe when you was young, you dreamed about owning one of those SGI you read about in a computer magazine… a beautiful Indy desktop, a mini tower O2, a square tower Octane… all that is now gone. Even when you can get them now for almost nothing, they are kinda soulless… SGI was silly enough to kill IRIX and go to the linux route… sure, a SGI computer could easily be your youth's ultimate dream machine, but today it is a dead dream.

Toolchest > System > System Shutdown





oh, sorry, I mean to power off the system…



     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 04:20 PM
 
it's once again time for apple to make history and buy them out.

Liberty - Free Markets - Peace
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 04:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by milhous
it's once again time for apple to make history and buy them out.
What exactly do they have to offer Apple?

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
P  (op)
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 05:22 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dark Helmet
What exactly do they have to offer Apple?
What's left of their patent portfolio on 3D graphics, XFS, possibly some talented people still, office space close to Cupertino... Not much, but it all depends on the price.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 05:33 PM
 
Originally Posted by P
Not much, but it all depends on the price.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1147..._whats_news_us

SGI, which employs more than 1,800 people world-wide, listed assets of $369.4 million and debt of $664.3 million in its bankruptcy filing.

I wouldn't want them for free.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 8, 2006, 05:39 PM
 
Originally Posted by P
What's left of their patent portfolio on 3D graphics, XFS, possibly some talented people still, office space close to Cupertino... Not much, but it all depends on the price.
None of that sounds like it is suited for Apple or worth any price.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 9, 2006, 02:21 AM
 
To buy SGI would have been interesting some years ago… when they were easily the king of 3D world, hardware and software wise… you would get all you need to get into 3D, from the whole OpenGL foundation and Alias software company to the great architecture inside their workstations… a company that had the best and fastest 64 bits UNIX computers with the right software apps, a great OS… everything is dead now… I guess one can blame the management… those thinking that linux was going to be the best next thing ever made.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 9, 2006, 12:26 PM
 
Originally Posted by Inside Man
To buy SGI would have been interesting some years ago… when they were easily the king of 3D world, hardware and software wise… you would get all you need to get into 3D, from the whole OpenGL foundation and Alias software company to the great architecture inside their workstations… a company that had the best and fastest 64 bits UNIX computers with the right software apps, a great OS… everything is dead now… I guess one can blame the management… those thinking that linux was going to be the best next thing ever made.
I agree with you. SGI had that guy Bob Bishop as CEO that did… nothing, Apple had much the same with Dr. Gil Amelio… luckily Apple got Steve back, he is the real reason that Apple is back, iMac, Mac OS X, iPod, iTunes Music Store… all those wouldn't be feasible without Steve running Apple again. SGI got nothing… it seems all the management was able to do was to expend a fortune getting a new company logo, they even didn't like the gorgeous classic Cube logo.


"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 9, 2006, 12:33 PM
 
So what does this mean for SUN? Don't they pretty much do the same thing as SGI?

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 9, 2006, 01:40 PM
 
No. Years ago, their paths diverged and SGI concentrated on graphics while Sun concentrated on high-reliability servers. (I said this in my post above.) SGI, at this point, has little to offer the market. Sun, on the other hand, can boast of servers with uptime second to none, which is why they are used for applications where Windows and Linux are considered too unstable.

tooki
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2006, 10:06 AM
 
It was about time, SGI finally added the Quad 1GHz Tezro to the system's home page, such configuration have been available for ages but they refused to reflect it…
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2