Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Replace Steve, tell us your pick(s)

Replace Steve, tell us your pick(s)
Thread Tools
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 12:03 PM
 
Without fighting over his current state of health, the likelihood of it happening, etc, replace Steve with someone that makes sense in your mind.

My choice: Reggie Fils-Aime, current President of Nintendo of America. If you've ever seen him speak publicly, you already know why. Reggie is one of the only people in business who can create a reality distortion field as powerful as Steve's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggie_Fils-Aime

Apple absolutely needs a strong orator to replace Steve, Phil Shiller's teddy bear act just doesn't cut it, even though Phil appears to be a nice, capable individual.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 12:08 PM
 
We went though this a year ago. nobody gave good suggestions.

I don't think Nintendo's CEO is a good choice because Nintendo copies Apples designs all the time, not the other way around.

Also Apple doesn't just need a sales man, they need a visionary.
(Last edited by Landos Mustache; Aug 15, 2006 at 12:15 PM. )

"Hello, what have we here?
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern VA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 12:39 PM
 
Ballmer?
iMac 24" | Core 2 Extreme 2.8GHz | 4GB RAM | 500GB HD
PowerBook G4 15" HR | 1.67GHz | 2GB RAM | 100GB HD
R.I.P 1995 Toyota Supra NA-T
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 12:42 PM
 
A visionary besides Steve?, Jonathan Ive of course.



I guess Reggie's keynotes would be funny as hell



"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 12:43 PM
 
There is no replacement for Steve.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 12:45 PM
 
Originally Posted by angelmb
A visionary besides Steve?, Jonathan Ive of course.

For design.. yes.

I get the feeling he has no clue about technology though and without steve guiding the designs it would be less then spectacular.

Remember Ive was there before Steve came back.

"Hello, what have we here?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 12:47 PM
 
I like what Reggie is doing at Nintendo, but I must be crazy because I don't think he's an engaging public speaker at all. His talk at E3 was a snooze and he comes across as quite a phoney IMO. Not even close to what Jobs is capable of.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 12:52 PM
 
I can envision Apple becoming like Gateway when Jobs leaves. Without any visionary guy at the top, they will just start selling pathetically designed computers as they fade into obscurity.

It will be the "Dark Ages" all over again, except this time there won't be any Steve to come back to the rescue, and MS won't be forced to keep Apple afloat.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 01:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
I can envision Apple becoming like Gateway when Jobs leaves. Without any visionary guy at the top, they will just start selling pathetically designed computers as they fade into obscurity.

It will be the "Dark Ages" all over again, except this time there won't be any Steve to come back to the rescue, and MS won't be forced to keep Apple afloat.
this is what most disturbs me about investing in the mac.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 01:06 PM
 
Originally Posted by tutelary
Apple absolutely needs a strong orator to replace Steve
Why?
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 01:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy
Why?
Because Apple needs more than anything to drive NEW USERS into its grasp. You dont do that with someone up there fumbling around on stage and being a weak speaker. Part of leading is speaking, bluntly. If Apple were subjected to several Phil Shiller WWDCs and Various Expos in a row the stock would drop like a rock.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 01:40 PM
 
Reggie Fils-Aime is a fake, stiff, emotionless public speaker. I loved the Nintendo keynote, but NOT because of Reggie. In fact, I would say that I loved it in spite of Reggie. Reggie is no Steve Jobs. Reggie might not even be a Roz Ho. Okay...so that last one way a lie.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: out of service area
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 01:41 PM
 
How about Noah Wyle?

It looks just like a telefunken' U-47 - Zappa
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 01:43 PM
 
Originally Posted by tutelary
Because Apple needs more than anything to drive NEW USERS into its grasp.
The only people who watch Steve speak are people who already have Macs. I've never met anyone who doesn't already have a Mac who even knows what Steve looks like.

People don't buy product because the CEO of the company is a good speaker - they buy product because they like the look of it, like the price or like the features.

Apple getting their hands on NeXT was way more important than getting Steve back.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 01:49 PM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy
The only people who watch Steve speak are people who already have Macs. I've never met anyone who doesn't already have a Mac who even knows what Steve looks like.

People don't buy product because the CEO of the company is a good speaker - they buy product because they like the look of it, like the price or like the features.

Apple getting their hands on NeXT was way more important than getting Steve back.
I think a great many people, in trying to get their friends into macs, get them to watch keynotes, as keynotes are targeted specifically at telling people what is different and better about the mac. Its certainly much easier than me trying to explain it to x random family member myself.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 01:52 PM
 
I think the Stevenotes are important because it creates a media frenzy, and one of Apple's greatest assets is its favourable media coverage after every little release.

Without Jobs, I doubt that Apple would get its product releases on the front page of the Wall Street Journal as frequently as they do now.
     
Y3a
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA - Just outside DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 02:01 PM
 
Billy Mays! He can SELL ANYTHING!!
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 02:18 PM
 
Who ever posts after me.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 02:32 PM
 
Hmm, I could get used to public speaking.

I've been a mac user since I've been six. That's enough qualifications, right?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 03:42 PM
 
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
For design.. yes.

I get the feeling he has no clue about technology though and without steve guiding the designs it would be less then spectacular.

Remember Ive was there before Steve came back.
I think I understand your point of view, or at least how you are focusing it, but even so, what kind of knowledge about technology would Ive need?, being an industrial designer he got a great background about a bunch of fields, from science of materials to how colors work… [he] couldn't care less about netburst, level 2 cachés and such stuff. What really matters is to understand e.g. the processing point of view, to be able to do things that were previously told were impossible to create.

Ive told once "It's sad and frustrating that we are surrounded by products that seem to testify to a complete lack of care. One object speaks volumes about the company that produced it and its values and priorities", for sure, Ive was working for Apple before Steve came back, but the Design Team -with Robert Brunner as head by then- was unable to give theirs projects that 'sex-apple', mainly because the guys in front of Apple weren't design driven, they didn't care about the obsessive attention to the detail Steve has, in such a scenario there is not much you -as designer- can do.

There aren't many industrial designers (and their respective teams) that can look back and say that they not only influenced their company, but the entire industry.

So, inside Apple and besides Steve, Ive is easily, my personal hero. You, as designer, has to understand it.


"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
     
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 04:02 PM
 
I picture Phil Schiller being the "transitionary" figurehead, and then Ive taking over eventually.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: back home
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 04:08 PM
 
Apple needs someone with a personality; I guess Ive would be the one; but can he be a businessman? Can he choose the right people to do the business part of it. Steve will be very hard to replace and unless he is in his grave, he propably won't be leaving Apple soon.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 04:14 PM
 
That Scott guy wasn't bad at the last keynote. That said is Ive still in Job's good graces? I really haven't seen him around much lately.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 04:15 PM
 
jobswiak (spelling)? But I hope Mr. Jobs has at least another decade in him to take us through to The Next Big Thing.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 04:20 PM
 
Buy Apple or I will terminate you.
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 06:02 PM
 
You know, they should just bring in Carly
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2006, 06:16 PM
 


If he can make millions of $$$ from crap like the "Pocket Fisherman" & the "Mr. Microphone", imagine what he could do with great products like the Mac and iPod.

I think I'm going to hold off my next purchase of an iPod until it not only plays music, but can also scramble an egg inside the shell! "No more slimy egg whites!"
"It's weird the way 'finger puppets' sounds ok as a noun..."
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Parker, Colorado
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 16, 2006, 12:10 AM
 

Ellen Feiss of course. She already has experience in marketing Apple products!
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: fourth sector
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 16, 2006, 02:35 AM
 


Nexus5.
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 16, 2006, 02:50 AM
 
Steve has already helped build the foundation of Apple's design and infrastructure, so in the end I don't think it will matter who takes over as long as he/she continues the path of his design philosophy. The fact that Steve gives Apple great presence is more of a bonus than anything else in helping promote an already good product.

I agree with those think products sell, no CEOs. Perhaps Steve's kids will one day become a mirror of him. I think Apple could use a female's touch on the executive level
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 16, 2006, 05:43 AM
 
Originally Posted by cjrivera
If he can make millions of $$$ from crap like the "Pocket Fisherman" & the "Mr. Microphone"
Those products are God's gift to America you freak!

I say give it all to Google. Quick and painless.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 16, 2006, 06:27 AM
 
The anaconda snake from "Snakes in a Plane"...
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2