Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Should Apple release a firmware patch for PPC Macs so they can run Classic natively?

Should Apple release a firmware patch for PPC Macs so they can run Classic natively?
Thread Tools
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 02:55 PM
 
If/when I get an Intel Mac, it'll be OS X only. Then, suddenly, my PowerBook is absolutely useless. Unlike my older beige G3 which can run OS 8 through 9, I can still use it to play all my old Mac games and quirky software.

My PowerBook... well, I can't run my old software on it, and I can't run any of the new software on it.

If I could install Classic on it, that'd be another story.

I know they won't, but it'd sure be nice if they released a firmware patch so the PPC Macs that could otherwise run Classic without the limiting firmware, could run Classic again.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Baninated
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 02:57 PM
 
they should do, but they wont because its too backwards.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 02:58 PM
 
You're nuts.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Urbandale, IA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 03:10 PM
 
Man, just *think* how fast that sucker would boot OS 9, though. You'd barely even be able to see the Extensions March (anyone remember that? I kinda miss it...)!
"Yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 03:12 PM
 
ok, what if you had a sawtooth g4, with an overdrive processor and tons of ram in it? wouldnt that be pretty blazing fast?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 03:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by Oneota View Post
Man, just *think* how fast that sucker would boot OS 9, though. You'd barely even be able to see the Extensions March (anyone remember that? I kinda miss it...)!
Oh god I hated just because of conflicts.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 03:30 PM
 
That would require them going back and updating OS 9. Not gonna happen.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 04:01 PM
 
Wait... why is your "PowerBook [become] absolutely useless?" It will still run OS X.

OS 9 is dead to me!
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 04:57 PM
 
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 04:59 PM
 
Would that be even possible w/o an OS 9 update ? Don't think so.

-t
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 05:42 PM
 
Originally Posted by mitchell_pgh View Post
Wait... why is your "PowerBook [become] absolutely useless?" It will still run OS X.

OS 9 is dead to me!
Everything is moving to the new Intel processors. My PowerBook is useless because nothing will be updated for the newer software, and I can't run any vintage software.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 05:43 PM
 
It's not just a firmware patch. Requires an OS 9 update and driver updates for OS 9. ATI isn't going to want to update their OS 9 graphics drivers, and Apple's OS 9 team was already disbanded.
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 05:52 PM
 
There's a product I think its called sheep sheerer that allows intel macs to run classic. I haven't tried it but I've come across the websites.
Michael
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 05:56 PM
 
Originally Posted by mac128k-1984 View Post
There's a product I think its called sheep sheerer that allows intel macs to run classic. I haven't tried it but I've come across the websites.
It's called SheepShaver and it's an emulator, so you still have to go grab a ROM from a Classic machine. And it doesn't have hardware accelerated graphics or anything. It's kinda glitchy.

The other problem i had with it was it couldn't run anything higher than 9.0.4.
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 07:50 PM
 
Originally Posted by goMac View Post
It's not just a firmware patch. Requires an OS 9 update and driver updates for OS 9. ATI isn't going to want to update their OS 9 graphics drivers, and Apple's OS 9 team was already disbanded.
Just like GoMac said: it's not as simple as a firmware update (in whatever way a firmware update could be called 'simple'). Although OS9 was not as tightly tied to the hardware it ran on as, say, System 7, it was still much more tied to the hardware than OSX is. Getting OS9 to boot on newer machines would require significant updates to OS9 itself, and no one at Apple has done much with the OS9 code in years.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 07:52 PM
 
Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
Just like GoMac said: it's not as simple as a firmware update (in whatever way a firmware update could be called 'simple'). Although OS9 was not as tightly tied to the hardware it ran on as, say, System 7, it was still much more tied to the hardware than OSX is. Getting OS9 to boot on newer machines would require significant updates to OS9 itself, and no one at Apple has done much with the OS9 code in years.
I wonder how big of a mess it would be to get OS 9 running on a G5...
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 27, 2006, 09:04 PM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
My PowerBook is useless because nothing will be updated for the newer software, and I can't run any vintage software.
So your Powerbook will stop working? The software it is running today will stop functioning? I don't think so. Your Powerbook will have the same functionality it has today.
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Central Texas
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 28, 2006, 12:11 AM
 
And with the exception of some new apps, I expect PPC apps to be updated for awhile. I have two MacIntels and one G5 iMac. I update my G5 imac just as much as I do my Macintels.
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 28, 2006, 04:51 AM
 
Get a Digital Audio G4 and upgrade the card to 1.7GHz or whatever. Or the newer version even, Quicksilver? MDD?
ice
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 28, 2006, 08:49 AM
 
PPC apps are not going away soon. The work to make an app Intel-native is basically the same as making it universal - i.e. PPC & Intel. The only exceptions are CPU-intensive plugins that may have hand-tooled Intel assembly code.

I have a feeling this is why Adobe's Soundbooth is Intel-only. They probably tool a lot of filters from Cool-Edit which was a Wintel app.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 28, 2006, 08:54 PM
 
Classic. Ick.
I went from MacOS 8.6 to Windows 2000 to MacOS X. MacOS 9 was so unstable for me it was virtually unusable.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2