 |
 |
Blu-ray/HD DVD... Who is winning? (Page 70)
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by exca1ibur
Disney made a decision at launch. Paramount was neutral then backpedaled during one of the major Hi-Def releases of the year.
Actually, Paramount made a decision at launch too - they were originally an HD DVD exclusive distributor. They went neutral for a while and then went BACK to HD DVD.
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
However, I still find it amusing people are harping on this, when the same is true for Blu-ray and Disney. Remember, Disney refused to deny they were given "incentives" to support Blu-ray.
So at least they did it before the war got into consumers hands. You don't wait over a year and when BR is outselling HD 2:1 or more you don't go back to the lower selling end for anything other than a shitload of cash.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: the True North
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK it looks to me like BluRay is going to be the winner. I've almost bought a HD-DVD drive for my X-Box360 several tmes, but just couldn't do it. I think I'm going to get a PlayStation3 for the BluRay instead. It seems like that's going to be a better buy in the long run that starting on a dying format at this point. Don't you think?
|
|
I love the U.S., but we need some time apart.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mrtew
OK it looks to me like BluRay is going to be the winner. I've almost bought a HD-DVD drive for my X-Box360 several tmes, but just couldn't do it. I think I'm going to get a PlayStation3 for the BluRay instead. It seems like that's going to be a better buy in the long run that starting on a dying format at this point. Don't you think?
I don't think so.
Personally I don't think either format is guaranteed to win at this point. It looks like both are going to be around for years.
As for getting a player, I'd just wait until a standalone drops below $200 and get one of those. Much better value for HD playback than either the 360 add-on or a PS3. And I say this as someone who owns both a standalone and a 360 add-on.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mrtew
OK it looks to me like BluRay is going to be the winner. I've almost bought a HD-DVD drive for my X-Box360 several tmes, but just couldn't do it. I think I'm going to get a PlayStation3 for the BluRay instead. It seems like that's going to be a better buy in the long run that starting on a dying format at this point. Don't you think?
Short answer, no.
Long answer is more like what Eug said. Although if you're willing to wait, the best bet would be to wait until a *combo* standalone drops below $300 or so. Then you don't have to worry about the "war" at all.
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mrtew
OK it looks to me like BluRay is going to be the winner.
I'd look at that crystal ball a little clearer.
Either neither is gonna make it, or HD-DVD is. So far things are pacing out to be the first.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
What do you base the idea that HD-DVD would win on? I can understand saying that it'll be a stalemate (and that may very well be the most likely outcome), but if I had to choose one, it wouldn't be the side that's getting outsold by 2 or 3 to 1...
|

Visit Denki News -- Macintosh and Video Game News and Commentary
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
I gave my reasoning for my beliefs earlier.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Anywhere but here.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mrtew
OK it looks to me like BluRay is going to be the winner. I've almost bought a HD-DVD drive for my X-Box360 several tmes, but just couldn't do it. I think I'm going to get a PlayStation3 for the BluRay instead. It seems like that's going to be a better buy in the long run that starting on a dying format at this point. Don't you think?
I've been partial to BluRay for a long time, but I've finally made the jump and purchased the HD DVD add on for my Xbox. How could I not with Best Buy giving them away? I got Heros season one ($99 retail), Transformers, 300, King Kong, plus my other five movies coming in the mail for $180.00 Pretty good deal if you ask me.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
"the count doesn't include Michael Bay's reluctantly sold 190,000 Transformers HD DVDs, a figure which will probably continue to rise, adding to the HD DVD camp's overall numbers. And the numbers may shift more favorably towards HD DVD as Paramount and Dreamworks maintain exclusivity for at least 17 more months."
Read the article? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
So, it's only 1.5:1 right now without the recent record-breaking Transformer numbers, eh? Not too shabby...
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Interesting new pricing entry in Wal-Mart's store inventory system:

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jokell82
So, it's only 1.5:1 right now without the recent record-breaking Transformer numbers, eh? Not too shabby...
Let's not count Transformers before they hatch; the Dreamamount press release clearly implies that 190k, if accurate, is for all of North America. I'm told that Nielsen only counts the United States.
Also, you've got to do a lot of funny rounding to round 1.87:1 to "only 1.5:1." Even if Blu-ray sold absolutely nothing last week, the ratio would move to 1.86 to 1. In other words, the biggest blockbuster exclusive HD has or will have for a year doesn't move the year-to-date ratio more than .01.
Oh, and ending in September, it also doesn't take into account the huge numbers that Fantastic Four did.
(Last edited by *TL; Oct 24, 2007 at 04:17 PM
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: the True North
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
I'd look at that crystal ball a little clearer.
Either neither is gonna make it, or HD-DVD is. So far things are pacing out to be the first.
I can't tell if you're just pushing people's buttons by always taking the viewpoint that's going to get people fighting or if you have some kind of point. Please tell me why you think that Bluray won't 'win'.
|
|
I love the U.S., but we need some time apart.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jokell82
So, it's only 1.5:1 right now without the recent record-breaking Transformer numbers, eh? Not too shabby...
It has been months where you can get an HD-DVD player for $150-200 and 7 free movies and BR is still outselling it the same as it was in January. That's pretty shabby.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by *TL
Let's not count Transformers before they hatch; the Dreamamount press release clearly implies that 190k, if accurate, is for all of North America. I'm told that Nielsen only counts the United States.
Also, you've got to do a lot of funny rounding to round 1.87:1 to "only 1.5:1." Even if Blu-ray sold absolutely nothing last week, the ratio would move to 1.86 to 1. In other words, the biggest blockbuster exclusive HD has or will have for a year doesn't move the year-to-date ratio more than .01.
Oh, and ending in September, it also doesn't take into account the huge numbers that Fantastic Four did.
How does 3mil:2mil equal 1.87:1???
And actually if BD sold squat last week, the new ratio would be 1.37:1
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
Interesting new pricing entry in Wal-Mart's store inventory system:
Just in time for Christmas too.
BTW, Bluray has been at 2:1 for a long long while. I don't understand why the Bluray fanboys are acting like it's a big deal. Bluray is not gaining ground, and HD-DVD is not losing it. Neither side is really winning or losing at this point.
|
|
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/23" Cinema Display
|
| |
|
| | | |