Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Why do we assume that our idea of GOODNESS is the best way?

Why do we assume that our idea of GOODNESS is the best way?
Thread Tools
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 27, 2006, 11:43 PM
 
Why do we assume that our idea of GOODNESS is the best way?

Why is being NICE automatically assumed to be the only way to be?

What if being bad, evil, dirty, ugly, violent, rude, inconsiderate was actually the best way to be?
     
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: retired
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 27, 2006, 11:47 PM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
<snip>What if being bad, evil, dirty, ugly, violent, rude, inconsiderate was actually the best way to be?
Reminds me of a couple of members here. Couldn't resist.
     
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: retired
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 27, 2006, 11:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
Why do we assume that our idea of GOODNESS is the best way?

Why is being NICE automatically assumed to be the only way to be?

What if being bad, evil, dirty, ugly, violent, rude, inconsiderate was actually the best way to be?
Well Stalin killed 24,000,000 of his own people. is that dirty, ugly and cruel enough?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 12:12 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
What if being bad, evil, dirty, ugly, violent, rude, inconsiderate was actually the best way to be?
What's with all this "what if" business?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 12:16 AM
 
We can generally say, a priori, that a "good" thing is something that either causes joy or decreases pain. Being dirty, ugly, rude, violent and inconsiderate generally has the opposite effect of this. Therefore, it is not good.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Annals of MacNN History
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 12:31 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
What if being bad, evil, dirty, ugly, violent, rude, inconsiderate was actually the best way to be?
I'd be worshipped as a deity.
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 01:17 AM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
We can generally say, a priori, that a "good" thing is something that either causes joy or decreases pain. Being dirty, ugly, rude, violent and inconsiderate generally has the opposite effect of this. Therefore, it is not good.
A Priori:Knowledge, judgments, and principles which are true without verification or testing. It is universally true.
www.carm.org/atheism/terms.htm
But I am questioning it. Why is joy good? Why is decreasing pain considered good?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 01:19 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
But I am questioning it. Why is joy good? Why is decreasing pain considered good?
Because secular society is somewhat hedonistic.
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 01:31 AM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
Because secular society is somewhat hedonistic.
So what does the other side of that coin read?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 01:36 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
So what does the other side of that coin read?
Nope, you've lost me there.
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 01:52 AM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
Because secular society is somewhat hedonistic.
Originally Posted by marden
So what does the other side of that coin read?
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
Nope, you've lost me there.
If secular society is somewhat hedonistic what characteristic(s) would you assign non-secular societies?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 01:58 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
If secular society is somewhat hedonistic what characteristic(s) would you assign non-secular societies?
Depends on what type of non-secularism is prevalent.
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 03:28 AM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
Depends on what type of non-secularism is prevalent.
Thanks for the enlightening reply.

     
Y3a
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA - Just outside DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 04:40 AM
 
Is giving horrible pain and suffering to "Bad" people considered "good"?

We're talking relative viewpoints here right. (Second oldest troll bait)
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 05:26 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
Why do we assume that our idea of GOODNESS is the best way?
Could you please change the "we" to "I" (and "our" to "mine" of course) because I'm pretty sure that MY goodness is different from YOURS!
There you have it!
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 05:43 AM
 
Originally Posted by Y3a View Post
Is giving horrible pain and suffering to "Bad" people considered "good"?

We're talking relative viewpoints here right. (Second oldest troll bait)
Originally Posted by badidea View Post
Could you please change the "we" to "I" (and "our" to "mine" of course) because I'm pretty sure that MY goodness is different from YOURS!
There you have it!
Hmm.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 05:44 AM
 
This thread made my head hurt. Is marden and Doofy arguing?

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 05:45 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
What if being bad, evil, dirty, ugly, violent, rude, inconsiderate was actually the best way to be?
You'd be elected president? *pah-dhump*

Thank you, I'll be here all night!

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 06:03 AM
 
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - - View Post
This thread made my head hurt. Is marden and Doofy arguing?
Is erik be showing off and his use the english?
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 06:06 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
Is erik be showing off and his use the english?
Nice ad-hominem against a non-native english speaker there marden. Maybe you'd like to make fun of my physical disabilities next. I am sure your ego would be boosted big time.

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 06:22 AM
 
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - - View Post
Nice ad-hominem against a non-native english speaker there marden. Maybe you'd like to make fun of my physical disabilities next. I am sure your ego would be boosted big time.
Your English is so good I would never have guessed you to be a non-native english speaker.

And any physical disability you might have is also unknown to me.

But if you're worried about someone finding fertile ground for criticism they wouldn't need to know anything about your language or physical aspects* in order to hit paydirt.

* If those things you say are true.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 28, 2006, 06:55 AM
 
Originally Posted by marden View Post
Why do we assume that our idea of GOODNESS is the best way?

Why is being NICE automatically assumed to be the only way to be?

What if being bad, evil, dirty, ugly, violent, rude, inconsiderate was actually the best way to be?
Because being NICE is not the only way to be because "nice" and "good" are relative. What is bad to me and bad to you will differ but as a culture they intersect just enough that we have some agreed upon things. Killing people is bad, saving kids is good. However some people support abortion and some don't.
-"I don't believe in God. "
"That doesn't matter. He believes in you."

-"I'm not agnostic. Just nonpartisan. Theological Switzerland, that's me."
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2