Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > DDT ad from the 1950s (Video)

DDT ad from the 1950s (Video)
Thread Tools
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2007, 04:46 PM
 
I saw this DDT ad from the 1950s on TV in a documentary.

I never realized they recommended painting your house with it and putting it all over your dog.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2007, 04:49 PM
 
Wow. Just wow.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2007, 04:56 PM
 
What's also interesting is that there is a huge push to re-legalize DDT - by none other than world health officials. Why? Because use of DDT to kill mosquitoes would decrease the number of deaths by malaria (the world's number one killer, I believe) to something like 20% of it's current levels.

The argument now is, would you rather save tens of thousands of lives, or make sure no bird eggs come out with thin shells?

I'm sure it's not that simple, but it's rare that you have a cause with it's main proponents completely switching around and now arguing the exact opposite of what they used to.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2007, 05:01 PM
 
I've seen funny ads where they have all these kids at picnic tables being sprayed with DDT. Pretty funny!
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2007, 09:12 PM
 
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane...whew! That's a mouthful.

I have been searching for about half an hour and I am trying to find out if OFF! or any other mosquito spray contained DDT. Can anyone help a brother out?
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2007, 09:23 PM
 
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2007, 09:28 PM
 
I look there. Nothing about OFF!.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 13, 2007, 09:33 PM
 
When did OFF come out? They banned in it in 60s.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2007, 12:16 AM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader View Post
I have been searching for about half an hour and I am trying to find out if OFF! or any other mosquito spray contained DDT. Can anyone help a brother out?
No, OFF! does not contain DDT. The terrible thing about the Silient Spring movement against DDT is that after the industrialized world got mosquitos under control, DDT was banned, thus leaving the third world to suffer with awful mosquito borne diseases. In the name of protecting bird eggs, environmentalists doomed the poor in so many countries to be plagued for generations by horrific diseases. I took a course in entymology in college and wrote a paper on insect-vector diseases. Most of them are caused by mosquitos, and the details are truly disturbing. Malaria, which is just one of a number of terrible diseases transmitted by mosquitos, may be the cause of even greater suffering in Africa than AIDS.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2007, 02:57 AM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
No, OFF! does not contain DDT. The terrible thing about the Silient Spring movement against DDT is that after the industrialized world got mosquitos under control, DDT was banned, thus leaving the third world to suffer with awful mosquito borne diseases. In the name of protecting bird eggs, environmentalists doomed the poor in so many countries to be plagued for generations by horrific diseases. I took a course in entymology in college and wrote a paper on insect-vector diseases. Most of them are caused by mosquitos, and the details are truly disturbing. Malaria, which is just one of a number of terrible diseases transmitted by mosquitos, may be the cause of even greater suffering in Africa than AIDS.
You obviously didn't learn very much about DDT if you think it was banned merely because it affected bird eggs.

greg
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2007, 07:57 PM
 
OFF! contains DEET (or N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide), not DDT. There are no studies that have linked DEET to just about anything. For something invented in 1946, sold to civilians in 1957, I am surprised that it has been proven to be harmful under normal use.

One thing is for sure, the stuff works.
(Last edited by Eriamjh; Jan 16, 2007 at 06:09 AM. )

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2007, 08:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by Eriamjh View Post
OFF! contains DEET (or N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide), not DDT. There are not studies that have linked DEET to just about anything. For something invented in 1946, sold to civilians in 1957, I am surprised that it has been proven to be harmful under normal use.

One thing is for sure, the stuff works.
Ahhh... Deet, DDT. Easily confused.

Are you saying DEET is or isn't harmful [see bold]?
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2007, 08:07 PM
 
dee dee dee
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 06:10 AM
 
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
dee dee dee


Are you saying DEET is or isn't harmful?
As far as I know, DEET, when used as directed, is safe. There are various reports of people dying after using products containing DEET, but everybody is allergic to something. Peanuts probably kill more.

One thing is for certain, DEET works in keeping mosquitos away.
(Last edited by Eriamjh; Jan 16, 2007 at 06:27 AM. )

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Upstate NY (cow country)
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 11:34 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eriamjh View Post


holy crap. I just had a laughing fit over that!

one thing to note with that picnic footage is that you're NOT seeing 100% DDT. That's mostly talcum powder that you see. Still it's amusing footage.
"Destroy your ego. Trust your brain. Destroy your beliefs. Trust your divinity." -Danny Carey

MacPro Quad 2.66, G4 MDD dual 867, 23" Cinema Display and 17" LCD, G4 Quicksilver dual 800, 12" Powerbook 867, iMac 300 Grape, B&W G3/300 with G4/450 running yellowdog, iPod 5GB, iPod mini, PowerCenter 150, Powercenter 132 tower, Performa 6116, Quadra 700, MacSE, LC II, eMate 300
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 12:33 PM
 
The problem with DDT was its overwhelming success, and thus over use. It was used to delouse refugees, eliminate all sorts of insect borne diseases, etc. Overuse, such as on fields, is what caused the biggest problems (putting tons of the stuff into the environment), AND what affected so many different bird species (DDT builds up through a food chain, so predators got much higher doses through eating prey that had themselves eaten contaminated prey). Most people remember the bird egg issue because it was used as the "poster child" for the push to ban DDT; the other very harmful aspects of DDT use were too technical for the public to be able to get a handle on then, but causing the destruction of our national symbol, the bald eagle, was easy to grasp.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Garden of Paradise Motel, Suite 3D
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 12:49 PM
 
Originally Posted by flabasha View Post

The argument now is, would you rather save tens of thousands of lives, or make sure no bird eggs come out with thin shells?
The law of unintended consequences is a cruel beeyotch.
He can be fixed -- you can't.
     
Eug  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 01:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
The problem with DDT was its overwhelming success, and thus over use. It was used to delouse refugees, eliminate all sorts of insect borne diseases, etc. Overuse, such as on fields, is what caused the biggest problems (putting tons of the stuff into the environment), AND what affected so many different bird species (DDT builds up through a food chain, so predators got much higher doses through eating prey that had themselves eaten contaminated prey). Most people remember the bird egg issue because it was used as the "poster child" for the push to ban DDT; the other very harmful aspects of DDT use were too technical for the public to be able to get a handle on then, but causing the destruction of our national symbol, the bald eagle, was easy to grasp.
Yup. While I agree with the sentiment that DDT should not have been completely banned, it's clear it was not properly regulated in the 60s. The video in the first post illustrates that.

I will also note that it was still in use in the 70s in Africa, and it's in use there now as well in some places.

In addition, there are several compounds that can be used instead of DDT, although admittedly they cost more and hence are problematic for the poor countries (which need them the most).
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 01:35 PM
 
The banning of DDT was the result of a scare-mongering campaign of misinformation. The potential harm of DDT was far overstated.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 06:21 PM
 
How so?

greg
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 07:42 PM
 
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 10:16 PM
 
I'm sorry, that's junkscience.org, and it's published by Steven Milloy. Both are laughingstocks of any kind of reliable information sources whatsoever. You might as well give me information on abortion from a Baptist website.

There's certainly evidence to suggest that the "DDT scare" was overblown, but there was also tons of evidence that DDT was being used far too liberally, at the expense of thousands of smaller animals.

greg
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2007, 10:37 PM
 
I picked the Milloy article 'cause it's easy to read. Yeah, he's sketchy, but he's right on this issue.
     
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2007, 06:04 AM
 
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton View Post
I'm sorry, that's junkscience.org, and it's published by Steven Milloy. Both are laughingstocks of any kind of reliable information sources whatsoever.

Not really.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2007, 06:59 AM
 
My day never gets going until I eat a pound of DDT with my McGriddle.
"Everything's so clear to me now: I'm the keeper of the cheese and you're the lemon merchant. Get it? And he knows it.
That's why he's gonna kill us. So we got to beat it. Yeah. Before he let's loose the marmosets on us."
my bandmy web sitemy guitar effectsmy photosfacebookbrightpoint
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2007, 10:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by RAILhead View Post
My day never gets going until I eat a pound of DDT with my McGriddle.
Do you wash it down with a steaming cup of thalamahyde?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2007, 12:07 PM
 
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Not really.
Really.

Thanks for the input, though.

greg
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
     
Eug  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 17, 2007, 12:23 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader View Post
Do you wash it down with a steaming cup of thalamahyde?
Thalidomide.

BTW, the problem there was that it was used in pregnant women. It's not a bad drug otherwise.

I think that the experience with DDT and thalidomide tell us that testing in the 50s and 60s sucked.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2