[TETENAL]

This is almost unbelievable (yet funny to listen to):

http://consumerist.com/consumer/asin...unt-220723.php

[Nodnarb]

Originally Posted by TETENAL 

This is almost unbelievable (yet funny to listen to):

http://consumerist.com/consumer/asin...unt-220723.php

That's stupid. He could have just said .002 dollars and .00002 dollars. That's it. Then the retarded verizon guy would have understood.

I didn't listen to the whole twenty minutes, but how much did that difference total out to be in his total usage?

[SpaceMonkey]

Originally Posted by Nodnarb 

That's stupid. He could have just said .002 dollars and .00002 dollars. That's it. Then the retarded verizon guy would have understood.

I didn't listen to the whole twenty minutes, but how much did that difference total out to be in his total usage?

70 dollars versus 70 cents.

[bstone]

they ended up admitting their reps were wrong in the 0.002 cents. it was indeed .002 dollars, but they said otherwise and even put a note on his account saying it was cents.

in the end he got all his money back

[Eriamjh]

That was long and painful. In the end, companies way overcharge for downloading on phones. What until someone gets a crazy iPhone bill for $1,000 just for surfing the web.

[turtle777]

Gotta love Verizon. Idiots.

-t

[Parvez]

This news is soooooo oooldddddd. It was a hot topic in 2006.

[brassplayersrock²]

ah man. i hope that doesn;t happen to me. having to explain it to so many dumb people. jeebus. and just if it's cold doesn;t mean that it can;t still happen nummerz