Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

bucephalus · Jan 30, 2007, 04:11 AM

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/064...r,74593,6.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_McMahan

Long-ish article, but the gist of the article is that millionaire Bruce McMahan, a fund manager, first has a sexual relationship with his daughter then secretly marries her.

Chuckit · Jan 30, 2007, 10:02 AM

Weirder than the incest is his come on — "your legs look like sexy versions of my legs."

nredman · Jan 30, 2007, 10:05 AM

nasty - great first post on macnn - not

Severed Hand of Skywalker · Jan 30, 2007, 10:10 AM

I don't know if I want to read that. Is it his biological daughter?

Kevin · Jan 30, 2007, 10:12 AM

Originally Posted by Chuckit

Weirder than the incest is his come on — "your legs look like sexy versions of my legs."

Maybe it's just he is really into himself?

Dakar² · Jan 30, 2007, 10:12 AM

I'm assuming she was as screwed up as him and agreed?

Chuckit · Jan 30, 2007, 10:50 AM

Originally Posted by Severed Hand of Skywalker

I don't know if I want to read that. Is it his biological daughter?

Yes, although he says since the DNA test was only 99.7% conclusive, he remains unconvinced.

Severed Hand of Skywalker · Jan 30, 2007, 10:54 AM

Originally Posted by Chuckit

Yes, although he says since the DNA test was only 99.7% conclusive, he remains unconvinced.

Oh yarg.

iranfromthezoo · Jan 30, 2007, 12:00 PM

and this takes place in Mississippi....man I really thought we were doing better and now this.....arg

Peter · Jan 30, 2007, 12:07 PM

eww....

davesimondotcom · Jan 30, 2007, 12:25 PM

Does this make inheritance issues more or less complicated?

Eug · Jan 30, 2007, 12:30 PM

Hmm... I saw this story done on the TV show Law and Order, and at the time thought that Law and Order was getting too unbelievable.

I guess not.

Rumor · Jan 30, 2007, 12:52 PM

Originally Posted by davesimondotcom

Does this make inheritance issues more or less complicated?

I guess now she can contest the will as the widow and child.

Dakar² · Jan 30, 2007, 12:53 PM

Originally Posted by Eug

Hmm... I saw this story done on the TV show Law and Order, and at the time thought that Law and Order was getting too unbelievable.

I guess not.

Next up, Man marries own clone in Springfield, Mass.

wallinbl · Jan 30, 2007, 02:36 PM

She's now pregnant with some new boyfriend. I don't care if she's hot, I'm not interested in dating a chick that married her father.

Dakar² · Jan 30, 2007, 02:43 PM

Originally Posted by wallinbl

She's now pregnant with some new boyfriend. I don't care if she's hot, I'm not interested in dating a chick that married her father.

But you are interested in dating the father, right?

Jim Paradise · Jan 30, 2007, 03:05 PM

"Her estranged husband, Schutt, sued McMahan in Mississippi, where it's still legal for one man to sue another for ruining his marriage."

Chuckit · Jan 30, 2007, 03:24 PM

Originally Posted by wallinbl

She's now pregnant with some new boyfriend. I don't care if she's hot, I'm not interested in dating a chick that married her father.

She actually isn't even really hot.

CheesePuff · Jan 30, 2007, 03:26 PM

Originally Posted by Severed Hand of Skywalker

I don't know if I want to read that. Is it his biological daughter?

It took all of the first sentence to find that out.

Severed Hand of Skywalker · Jan 30, 2007, 03:32 PM

Originally Posted by CheesePuff

It took all of the first sentence to find that out.

Thanks professor but I just clicked the first link with the long assed story and the first sentence is "A secret sexual relationship with his daughter was not enough."

Kevin · Jan 30, 2007, 09:52 PM

Hey who is to tell two adults that love each other what they can and cannot do!1

Eynstyn · Jan 30, 2007, 10:26 PM

Originally Posted by nredman

nasty - great first post on macnn - not

If he thought this was a place where sex and lubricious subject matter would be of interest he was definitely wrong.

Hot babes - 2005 (super pic orgy) (Multi-page thread 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... Last Page) 1,638 1,594,319

Eynstyn · 10:41 PM

Originally Posted by Dakar²

But you are interested in dating the father, right?

Let's be frank. Although we aren't at the top of this pecking order, we are in the chain.

Perv & Daughter/Wife

Other family members.

Those others who are materially affected, directly. (Lawyers and employees, future friends, beaus)

Those who materially affected, indirectly. (Media)

Those whose appetites are sated with information like this. (Us)

Gossamer · Jan 30, 2007, 10:38 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

Hey who is to tell two adults that love each other what they can and cannot do!1

Good point. Everyone else is just incestaphobic, and should go to rehab for it.

Dark Helmet · Jan 30, 2007, 11:17 PM

Originally Posted by Gossamer

Good point. Everyone else is just incestaphobic, and should go to rehab for it.

Ya who would tell two people what they can and cannot do.

Ahem.....church...gay.

Gossamer · Jan 30, 2007, 11:20 PM

Originally Posted by Dark Helmet

Ya who would tell two people what they can and cannot do.

Ahem.....church...gay.

Wait...there's no possible way that Kevin and I both were making some sort of implication towards that.

No way at all.

zro · Jan 30, 2007, 11:27 PM

So no one else finds the OPs username to be a little too... related... to the topic to be coincidence?

Dark Helmet · Jan 30, 2007, 11:34 PM

Originally Posted by zro

So no one else finds the OPs username to be a little too... related... to the topic to be coincidence?

He's a big fan

CheesePuff · Jan 31, 2007, 12:32 AM

Originally Posted by Severed Hand of Skywalker

Thanks professor but I just clicked the first link with the long assed story and the first sentence is "A secret sexual relationship with his daughter was not enough."

Should have went to the wiki article.

D. Bruce McMahan is the chief executive officer of convertible securities firm McMahan Securities Co. L.P. who has gained notoriety for allegations of sexual relationship with his biological daughter.

Eynstyn · Jan 31, 2007, 12:34 AM

Originally Posted by Dark Helmet

Ya who would tell two people what they can and cannot do.

Ahem.....church...gay.

If you noticed there were and are all kinds of morality laws that are secular in nature. No churches involved. If you hate God, religion and churches that's one thing. But remember the laws are here for your own good. To benefit all of us. No matter our belief or non belief.

Kevin · Jan 31, 2007, 05:49 AM

Originally Posted by Dark Helmet

Ya who would tell two people what they can and cannot do.

Most everyone in this thread....

Dakar² · Jan 31, 2007, 06:55 AM

Originally Posted by Eynstyn

Those whose appetites are sated with information like this. (Us)

Sated? I couldn't leave my desk for 15 minutes.

Severed Hand of Skywalker · Jan 31, 2007, 10:31 AM

Originally Posted by Eynstyn

But remember the laws are here for your own good. To benefit all of us. No matter our belief or non belief.

My own good?

And by the way the laws against homosexuality come from "religious beliefs" and influence the government. Nobody is harmed if 2 people of the same sex love earth other so how is that benefiting all of us by making it illegal?

"No matter our belief or non belief."
You talk peoples beliefs but you are really saying "Christian believe vs human rights = Christian wins".

Kevin · Jan 31, 2007, 10:35 AM

Not all moral laws were religious. There was many non-religious people that were moral people as well. And made laws against things they deemed degraded society as a whole. But since you HATE anything Christian it's just easier for you to bash them within your rant.

Which is ironic because you are practicing the same hate and bigotry you are bitching about them doing.

I guess bigotry is only bad when it's used against something you stand for SWG?

G Barnett · Jan 31, 2007, 10:38 AM

Man, at this point I'm actually surprised nobody's yet linked to a .wav of Duelling Banjos in reference to their "all-in-the-famly" activities....

Kevin · Jan 31, 2007, 10:43 AM

Well it IS Floriduh..

Eug · Jan 31, 2007, 10:47 AM

Originally Posted by Severed Hand of Skywalker

My own good?

And by the way the laws against homosexuality come from "religious beliefs" and influence the government. Nobody is harmed if 2 people of the same sex love earth other so how is that benefiting all of us by making it illegal?

"No matter our belief or non belief."
You talk peoples beliefs but you are really saying "Christian believe vs human rights = Christian wins".

Of course, this has nothing to do with this thread, considering there is no homosexuality involved.

It's about some guy screwing his biological daughter.

Kevin · Jan 31, 2007, 11:40 AM

SWG is famous for his derailing threads with gay and anti-Christian ranting.

A lot like Salty does with his "HEY GUYS I AM GAY" derails.

It's become a staple and a cliche here at MacNN. We've come to just accept it I guess.

Gossamer · Jan 31, 2007, 11:43 AM

I've had this one sitting around for a while, waiting for a good time to pull it out. I guess this is as good of a time as any.

Kevin · Jan 31, 2007, 11:45 AM

But it's not relevant.

Oh wait, I did bring up Salty.

my bad.

Gossamer · Jan 31, 2007, 11:49 AM

Originally Posted by Kevin

But it's not relevant.

Oh wait, I did bring up Salty.

my bad.

It was going to say something about gays/homosexuality/etc but I figured 'Salty' summed that all up.

Dakar² · Jan 31, 2007, 11:50 AM

Originally Posted by Gossamer

It was going to say something about gays/homosexuality/etc but I figured 'Salty' summed that all up.

I'm assuming this isn't a flavor comment.

Brien · Jan 31, 2007, 11:56 AM

There goes lunch!

Dakar² · Jan 31, 2007, 11:58 AM

Originally Posted by Brien

There goes lunch!

Too salty?

Gossamer · Jan 31, 2007, 12:02 PM

Originally Posted by Dakar²

I'm assuming this isn't a flavor comment.

I wonder if the connotation in name selection was on purpose.

Dakar² · Jan 31, 2007, 12:04 PM

I've wondered myself.

Volunteer blind taste tests I conducted concluded it's a coincidence.

G Barnett · Jan 31, 2007, 12:06 PM

AP -- Online:

A MacNN thread suffered a serious derailment today. Witnesses say that it simply and unexpectedly jumped the tracks, with several cars jacknifing and spilling their cargo everywhere.

Authorities believe it was a circus train, based on the large numbers of clowns and mimes seen scattered about the wreckage. "We're doing everything we can to rescue those poor creatures, but we're hampered by piles of invisible boxes that are strewn about the area," reported one fireman who wished to remain anonymous.

(god, I'm bored....)

Dakar² · Jan 31, 2007, 12:08 PM

Originally Posted by G Barnett

AP -- Online:

A MacNN thread suffered a serious derailment today. Witnesses say that it simply and unexpectedly jumped the tracks, with several cars jacknifing and spilling their cargo everywhere.

Authorities believe it was a circus train, based on the large numbers of clowns and mimes seen scattered about the wreckage. "We're doing everything we can to rescue those poor creatures, but we're hampered by piles of invisible boxes that are strewn about the area," reported one fireman who wished to remain anonymous.

(god, I'm bored....)

Dakar was seen leaving the center of crash, much like the T1000 left the wreckage of the Mac truck in T2.

Eynstyn · Jan 31, 2007, 12:18 PM

Originally Posted by Kevin

Most everyone in this thread....

Eynstyn · Jan 31, 2007, 12:30 PM

Originally Posted by Severed Hand of Skywalker

My own good?

And by the way the laws against homosexuality come from "religious beliefs" and influence the government. Nobody is harmed if 2 people of the same sex love earth other so how is that benefiting all of us by making it illegal?

"No matter our belief or non belief."
You talk peoples beliefs but you are really saying "Christian believe vs human rights = Christian wins".

The fabric of society becoming looser and less able to support the continuance of the traditional family unit. That sort of thing. Perpetuation of what made America great or what has made any civilization great has not been achieved with the lovely, but risky, experiment to wholeheartedly embrace an "anyone can marry whoever and whatever they want" ideology.

Your desires are understandable but the idea of sanctioning (i.e. promoting) this ideal would have ramifications far beyond your desire to live in happily wedded bliss. The impact would be far reaching and irreversable and what might be at stake could be western civilization itself.

You are talking about screwing around with the basic building block of civilization and just as love and war have many connections and similarities as we have seen in the war, all kinds of nasty unintended consequences can spring up. Well the same is true in the conduct of love.

Please stop thinking about yourselves and your pleasure in this matter and instead think about humanity.