[brassplayersrock²]

I personally like my signature, and currently is no rule against having a spoiler tag as your signature, but alas, someone is telling me that it is "distracting" them. So I have decided to let the community of MacNN decide. Do I keep my signature, or do I change it??
-a

[Peter]

absurd signature.

[Tiresias]

Yes, absurd. Brilliantly absurd.

I say keep it, but edit the message to be more in line with the unmitigated absurdity of the concept.

You can change the message on a regular basis. Like a textual jack-in-the-box. People will hate themselves for not being able to stop themselves from clicking it to see what it says

[marden]

Originally Posted by Tiresias 

Yes, absurd. Brilliantly absurd.

I say keep it, but edit the message to be more in line with the unmitigated absurdity of the concept.

You can change the message on a regular basis. Like a textual jack-in-the-box. People will hate themselves for not being able to stop themselves from clicking it to see what it says

That's what's so infuriating about it. You have to always click it because you never know what it will hold/hide.

[Tiresias]

Originally Posted by marden 

That's what's so infuriating about it. You want to always click it because you never know what it will hold/hide.

Fixed.

[marden]

Originally Posted by Tiresias 

Fixed.

OK.

[mac128k-1984]

Its kind of unimaginative, I liked your older sig before.

[Tiresias]

Originally Posted by mac128k-1984 

Its kind of unimaginative, I liked your older sig before.

There you are, brassplayersrock—next week's mystery message (but stick an apostrophe into that its).

[Dakar²]

It's twice as funny if he sigs turned off and doesn't have to suffer it.

[Gossamer]

While there's no rule against a spoiler, there are still rules regarding width. Anyone else creating a sig that took up ~80% of the window would get screamed at.

[Doofy]

If you change it, it'll save me a fiver and a bottle of Jack.

[Demonhood]

i vote no. what do i win?

[Dakar²]

The thread.

[Demonhood]

sweet. it's what i've always wanted.

[Dakar²]

And I've always wanted you to have it.

[Gossamer]

It's gone! Sigh of relief.

[brassplayersrock²]

and not by me either gossy. reason why there is now a new rule in the signature guidelines is because demonhood had to abuse his admin. powers and not allow me, or anyone else now, to be able to use it as their signature because he deemed it "to distracting"



-a

[Gossamer]

Originally Posted by brassplayersrock 

and not by me either gossy. reason why there is now a new rule in the signature guidelines is because demonhood had to abuse his admin. powers and not allow me, or anyone else now, to be able to use it as their signature because he deemed it "to distracting"

-a

You should make a thread in the feedback forum crying about this. The "OMG TEH MOD POWER ABUSE LOL!1!1" threads always turn golden.

[Dakar²]

Your sig was over 200 px wide. I imagine they don't allow quote boxes either.

[brassplayersrock²]

Originally Posted by Gossamer 

You should make a thread in the feedback forum crying about this. The "OMG TEH MOD POWER ABUSE LOL!1!1" threads always turn golden.

good idea

[brassplayersrock²]

Originally Posted by Dakar² 

Your sig was over 200 px wide. I imagine they don't allow quote boxes either.

there was no way to control the width that i could find. that's the default for the [/spoiler] tag [/spoiler] that dh made i guess.

on a happy note, my new signature is within all guidelines. new and old

-a

[Dakar²]

Originally Posted by brassplayersrock 

there was no way to control the width that i could find.

Then you should understand that you can't use it then.

[brassplayersrock²]

*shrug* there shouldn't of been a problem in the first place. anyways, i got to use it for a while and now it's changed to sig guideline specs cya around, it's great out, and i dont want to lose my chance of enjoying it.

-a

[Gossamer]

Originally Posted by brassplayersrock 

*shrug* there shouldn't of been a problem in the first place. anyways, i got to use it for a while and now it's changed to sig guideline specs cya around, it's great out, and i dont want to lose my chance of enjoying it.

-a

Wow, what an original idea for a sig!

[Dakar²]

Originally Posted by Gossamer 

Wow, what an original idea for a sig!

Now if only you'd fix yours...
I am smarter than you think

[Peter]

speaking of sigs, is your sig auto generated depending on what you've been listening to (eg, the image changes)

[Gossamer]

I don't think so, as the name of the sig includes "NN."

[Gossamer]

Originally Posted by Dakar² 

Now if only you'd fix yours...
I am smarter than you think

What's wrong with mine?

And just for reference:

Uploaded on Feb. 6th.

[kick52]

you need a more wittier, more funnier one.

[Kevin]

Poll made redundant. Demonhood decided.

[Doofy]

Originally Posted by kick52 

you need a more wittier, more funnier one.

Young Jedi, your English teacher sucks.

Either "wittier, funnier" or "more witty, more funny", never "more *******er".

[analogika]

That's the bestest, mostest, and most correctestly wrote English I've ever saw.

[imitchellg5]

Originally Posted by Gossamer 

You should make a thread in the feedback forum crying about this. The "OMG TEH HAMSTER POWER ABUSE LOL!1!1" threads always turn golden.

Fixinated.

[Dakar²]

Unfunninated.

[Dakar²]

Originally Posted by Gossamer 

Wow, what an original idea for a sig!

I'm beginning to think brassplayers do not rock.

[imitchellg5]

Originally Posted by Dakar² 

Unfunninated.

I was just giving credit to where it is due.

[Gossamer]

Originally Posted by Gossamer 

You should make a thread in the feedback forum crying about this. The "OMG TEH MOD POWER ABUSE LOL!1!1" threads always turn golden.

Hm...he actually did

[Dakar²]

Oh hell did you miss it yesterday? Poor bastard.

[Gossamer]

Originally Posted by Dakar² 

Oh hell did you miss it yesterday? Poor bastard.

I saw his reply and the wink, but didn't think to check for it until this morning...too bad I didn't get in on that.

[andi*pandi]

ah. much better.