 |
 |
Western Europeans: Need an explanation.
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Could someone please explain to this dumb American: The difference between the United Kingdom, Britain and England.
I know Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England are "constituent" countries that make up the UK. But how is the UK a country in and of itself? Or is it? For example: When someone is from England they are considered British but if someone is from Scotland they are considered Scotish but not British? Anyways any help would be appreciated... I just need it broken down simply. BTW Wikipedia doesn't help in the explanation.. it seems to make me more confused.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's kind of like Canadians pretending that Canada is is a country in and of itself, but we all know they're just living under the umbrella of America.
Again, just trying to get under someone's skin. I guarantee you this one works though.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Jawbone54:
Keep your head up punk.
|
|
"Life is the crummiest book I ever read. There isn't a hook, just a lot of cheap shots, pictures to shock, and characters an amateur would never dream up." (Bad Religion)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Also it's easier to think of New Zealand as the sixth state of Australia.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MacinTommy
Could someone please explain to this dumb American: The difference between the United Kingdom, Britain and England.
I know Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England are "constituent" countries that make up the UK. But how is the UK a country in and of itself? Or is it? For example: When someone is from England they are considered British but if someone is from Scotland they are considered Scotish but not British? Anyways any help would be appreciated... I just need it broken down simply. BTW Wikipedia doesn't help in the explanation.. it seems to make me more confused.
I won't bother looking it up so I might be wrong, but I always thought of the U.K. as if it were the USA but instead of having 50 states the U.K. has just a handful of States; England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales.
If we in the USA still had the emphasis on States Rights as we once had it might be easier to see each of our states as small nations, in and of themselves, the way that England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland are.
And, once again, I may be totally wrong.
|
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status:
Offline
|
|
The British Isles (I think) are made up of Scotland, England, Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland Wales the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey.
Britain (or Great Britain) is all of these except the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.
The United Kingdom is Scotland, England, Northern Ireland, Wales, Isle of Man, Jersey, Guernsey Alderny, Herm and Sark.
They are all separate countries.
Scotland = Famous for Toffee and Whisky and deep frying crazy things
England = Famous for thinking its more important than it is
Republic of Ireland = famous for bombs and kneecaps
Northern Ireland = famous for Guinness and Whiskey
Wales = Famous for Leaks and Daffodils
The Isle of Man = Famous because the cats are born without tails
Jersey = Famous for cream and tax
Guernsey = Famous for cream and tax
Alderny= Famous for nothing
Sark = Famous for having no cars
Herm = Famous for having no bicycles
(Last edited by moonmonkey; Dec 9, 2007 at 03:18 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Uh oh.

|
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
The British Isles (I think) are made up of Scotland, England, Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland Wales the Isle of Man, Jersey and Guernsey.
Britain (or Great Britain) is all of these except the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.
The United Kingdom is Scotland, England, Northern Ireland, Wales, Isle of Man, Jersey, Guernsey Alderny, Herm and Sark.
Nearly there.
The British Isles are as you state - the whole lot.
Great Britain is the mainland only - England, Wales, Scotland.
The United Kingdom is England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
"Britain" is basically the UK - there's not really a definition for it.
The Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are Crown Dependencies and are not part of the UK.
Originally Posted by MacinTommy
When someone is from England they are considered British but if someone is from Scotland they are considered Scotish but not British?
Anyone Scottish is also British. It's pretty much exactly the same as with the US (i.e. a Texan is also American) but on a smaller scale. When a Scotsman says "I'm Scottish, not British" they're simply being an awkward Scottish nationalist asshole and demonstrating as such.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
When a Scotsman says "I'm Scottish, not British" they're simply being an awkward Scottish nationalist asshole and demonstrating as such.
I know a Pict who still has a bone to pick with the Scots for invading his lands.
|
|
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have. As government grows, liberty decreases" - Thomas Jefferson
"Tony Blair is very anxious to be seen as green. Everything has to be couched in environmental language - even if it's slightly Orwellian." - Jonathan Mendelsohn, director of general election resources for the British Labour Party.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you go back far enough then you'll find that the modern Brits are really Germans (The Angels and the Saxons originally lived in what is now Northern and Eastern Germany - thus Anglo-Saxon) but they don't like to be reminded of that. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status:
Offline
|
|
I refuse to believe that, no matter how true it is.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
We're not even going to start on how the royals are actually German, as well, right? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
See, that's how we can get away with taking the mick out of the Germans. We're basically just taking the mick out of ourselves.

|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
House of Windsor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This why Diana was chosen to mother to the heirs of the throne. The House of Windsor is very German in origin, while the Spencer family is of English ancestry
We're not even going to start on how the royals are actually German, as well, right?
oops too late
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
See, that's how we can get away with taking the mick out of the Germans. We're basically just taking the mick out of ourselves.
Yup. The British Germans got the 'let's build an empire' part of being German right and the German Germans finally gave up on that and decided to concentrate on keeping their trains running on time instead.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Mastrap
Yup. The British Germans got the 'let's build an empire' part of being German right and the German Germans finally gave up on that and decided to concentrate on keeping their trains running on time instead.
You guys got the "can actually build a car which doesn't break down every thousand miles" bit too.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for all of the feedback.. it makes more sense now. But here is another thing that I was wondering about. How do they break it down for the Olympics?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MacinTommy
Thanks for all of the feedback.. it makes more sense now. But here is another thing that I was wondering about. How do they break it down for the Olympics?
I still trying to figure out why Puerto Rico gets a team of their own.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Nearly there.
The British Isles are as you state - the whole lot.
Great Britain is the mainland only - England, Wales, Scotland.
The United Kingdom is England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
"Britain" is basically the UK - there's not really a definition for it.
Depending on which authority you ask, Britain can either be exactly the same as Great Britain (in which case the pesky little islands—Guernsey, Jersey, etc.—are considered part of Great Britain, too), or Great Britain can refer to the island that comprises England, Wales, and Scotland, while Britain is Great Britain plus all the pesky little islands.
If you go back far enough then you'll find that the modern Brits are really Germans (The Angels and the Saxons originally lived in what is now Northern and Eastern Germany - thus Anglo-Saxon) but they don't like to be reminded of that.
German ic, not German. There was no such thing as ‘German’ back when the Angles and Saxons left their homelands and went westward.
Not that they’d ever have called themselves ‘German(ic)’, anyway: German(ic) is a Latin name, adopted from Celtic. Early and middle Germanic tribes don’t seem to have had a common name for themselves, only for ‘the others’ ( *walha-, as in Wales, Welsh, Walloon, the Volcae, etc.).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
Depending on which authority you ask
Exactly.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Exactly.
As with everything else (except, alas, taxes). 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
I always thought it was the following. Am I wrong?
England = England
England + Wales = Britian
England + Wales + Scotland = Great Britian
England + Wales + Scotland + Northern Ireland = United Kingdom
|
|
One should never stop striving for clarity of thought and precision of expression.
I would prefer my humanity sullied with the tarnish of science rather than the gloss of religion.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dcmacdaddy
I always thought it was the following. Am I wrong?
Sorry, but yes, you are. Number two is wrong (Scotland is part of Britain—Britain is a geographic term, not a national term: it refers to the island, not the nations the island is divided into), and arguably number three as well (see pesky islands above). One and four are correct, though.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are not countries, they are regions. Wales is a principality. The United Kingdom is a country.
God alone knows why the rest of the world allows us to play soccer as separate entities. It's not as if any of the individual teams are any good.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Andrew Stephens
England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are not countries, they are regions. Wales is a principality. The United Kingdom is a country.
God alone knows why the rest of the world allows us to play soccer as separate entities. It's not as if any of the individual teams are any good.
No, England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland are countries. They’re constituent countries.
In fact, Northern Ireland is not a region at all, though both England, Wales, and Scotland can be said to be.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
England, Scotland and Northern Ireland are countries. Wales is a principality.
Regions? Sounds like someone's been sucking at the EU/NuLabour propaganda teat.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
arguably number three as well (see pesky islands above).
Three is correct. Isle of Man and the Channel Islands are not in the UK or Great Britain. Those "many small islands" that wiki is going on about is stuff like the Isle of Wight, the Outer Hebrides, etc.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sorry, you’re right—I thought Isle of Wight, the Hebrides, etc., weren’t a part of England and Scotland, respectively. Wikipedia informs me otherwise, they are. Then three is quite correct.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
So basically, the UK is kinda like the EU, being composed of several different countries of which England is just one. Great Britain is the name of the island on which England, Scotland, and Wales are located. Britain can be either an abbreviated name for said island, or more of a conceptual national identity for what remains of the empire. Am I right in assuming that India, Austraia, et al would have been considered part of Britain while they were part of the empire?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Am I right in assuming that India, Austraia, et al would have been considered part of Britain while they were part of the empire?
I’m not sure they were that pedantic back then—most probably considered those places to be part of England too, not just (Great) Britain.
Was Australia really ever considered ‘part’ of the British Empire, though? Wasn’t it more of a... how to say? Sort of like what Guantánamo is within the US currently? Not really an integral part of the country/empire, but still a place being used by it.
(Disclaimer: I don’t know much about the British Empires and the pukka sahibs and all that, so I’m probably way off, here.)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I recall trying to buy something off ebay and I paid in Euro dollars and he emailed me back asking for British Pounds.
I guess England is not part of the Euro money system.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Buckaroo
I recall trying to buy something off ebay and I paid in Euro dollars and he emailed me back asking for British Pounds.
I guess England is not part of the Euro money system.
“Euro dollars”
No, England (and the rest of the UK) doesn’t participate in the Euro. Nor do any of the Scandinavian countries, by the way.*
* Next topic, now we’ve done England/Great Britain/UK: No, Finland is not part of Scandinavia, though it is a part of the Nordic Countries, and they are a member of the Eurozone. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Buckaroo
I recall trying to buy something off ebay and I paid in Euro dollars and he emailed me back asking for British Pounds.
I guess England is not part of the Euro money system.
No, it's not. England still uses the pound sterling, and I don't imagine they'll switch to the Euro any time soon (both for financial reasons and because, for some reason, the British seem to have a strong emotional attachment to their currency—actually I guess it's not that strange, I guarantee Americans would be the same way about getting rid of the dollar for whatever ridiculous reason).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
I’m not sure they were that pedantic back then—most probably considered those places to be part of England too, not just (Great) Britain.
Was Australia really ever considered ‘part’ of the British Empire, though? Wasn’t it more of a... how to say? Sort of like what Guantánamo is within the US currently? Not really an integral part of the country/empire, but still a place being used by it.
(Disclaimer: I don’t know much about the British Empires and the pukka sahibs and all that, so I’m probably way off, here.)
I'm not really sure either. Was Australia considered an actual colony, or just a dumping ground for societal refuse?
However, as far as I know, Guantanamo Bay is actually considered American soil just as US embassies in other countries are.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
However, as far as I know, Guantanamo Bay is actually considered American soil just as US embassies in other countries are.
But would you consider it an integral part of the US?
If asked to draw a detailed map of the US, you’d obviously include Hawai‘i and all those other little islands you have lying about scattered across the Pacific, but would you include Guantánamo Bay? Or US embassies worldwide?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
So basically, the UK is kinda like the EU, being composed of several different countries of which England is just one. Great Britain is the name of the island on which England, Scotland, and Wales are located. Britain can be either an abbreviated name for said island, or more of a conceptual national identity for what remains of the empire anyone born in the British Isles (except the Republic of Ireland) or anyone born on a crown dependency who so chooses to be called "British".
:nods:
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
Finland is not part of Scandinavia
I didn't know that.
Originally Posted by nonhuman
I'm not really sure either. Was Australia considered an actual colony, or just a dumping ground for societal refuse?
Penal colony initially, then proper colony sometime after they started contributing by broadcasting Neighbours to the rest of the World.
Cipher is prolly the bloke to ask about Oz.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status:
Offline
|
|
Fellow Britons I need an additional explanation… what the hell happened to your automotive industry?, now that sucks. 
|
"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Penal colony initially, then proper colony sometime after they started contributing by broadcasting Neighbours to the rest of the World.
Surely, if ever there was a time to make them a penal colony, it was as punishment for inflicting Neighbours upon an unsuspecting world?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
No, it's not. England still uses the pound sterling, and I don't imagine they'll switch to the Euro any time soon (both for financial reasons and because, for some reason, the British seem to have a strong emotional attachment to their currency—actually I guess it's not that strange,
Well, the British ALREADY went through the whole getting-rid-of-your-currency once a few decades ago, when they switched from the whole pounds/shillings/farthings/pence/crowns/guineas/assorted bits mess to a less insane metric pound in 1971.
And they botched the last attempt at a fixed exchange rate back in the early 90's by overvaluing the pound, which backfired nastily and made them wary of further currency experiments.
I'd think that one generation down the road, minds will be a little more open.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
To be honest, the vast majority of Brits don't see any point in changing to the Euro.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
Well, the British ALREADY went through the whole getting-rid-of-your-currency once a few decades ago, when they switched from the whole pounds/shillings/farthings/pence/crowns/guineas/assorted bits mess to a less insane metric pound in 1971.
And they botched the last attempt at a fixed exchange rate back in the early 90's by overvaluing the pound, which backfired nastily and made them wary of further currency experiments.
I'd think that one generation down the road, minds will be a little more open.
True, but is there really anyone out there (well, anyone worth listening to, I'm sure you can find someone) that doesn't think that decimalization was a good thing?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by angelmb
Fellow Britons I need an additional explanation… what the hell happened to your automotive industry?, now that sucks.
Minis, Aston Martins, Jaguars and Bentleys were doing better than ever last I heard.
|
|
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have. As government grows, liberty decreases" - Thomas Jefferson
"Tony Blair is very anxious to be seen as green. Everything has to be couched in environmental language - even if it's slightly Orwellian." - Jonathan Mendelsohn, director of general election resources for the British Labour Party.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by PaperNotes
Minis, Aston Martins, Jaguars and Bentleys were doing better than ever last I heard.
Are any of those companies even British owned anymore?
Minis are BMW and Aston Martins and Jaguars are Ford. Not sure about Bentley.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Not sure about Bentley.
VW.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
VW.
Seriously?!?
Wow, didn't expect that.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Penal colony initially, then proper colony sometime after they started contributing by broadcasting Neighbours to the rest of the World.
Cipher is prolly the bloke to ask about Oz.
Now we are entering Commonwealth territory. As if the original question wasn't hard enough 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
* Next topic, now we’ve done England/Great Britain/UK: No, Finland is not part of Scandinavia, though it is a part of the Nordic Countries, and they are a member of the Eurozone.
Correct -- although there are many native speakers of Swedish in this non-Scandinavian country, many of their nineteenth century ancestors saw the way forward with the majority: "Swedes we are no longer, Russians we can never become, so let us be Finns!"
Fennoman movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Damn. After reading all this, I'm even more confused.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Jawbone54
It's kind of like Canadians pretending that Canada is is a country in and of itself, but we all know they're just living under the umbrella of America.
Again, just trying to get under someone's skin. I guarantee you this one works though.
Na, that one wasn't terribly creative 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|