Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > What? Homeland Security in our Internet connections? (Should we be worried?)

What? Homeland Security in our Internet connections? (Should we be worried?)
Thread Tools
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 09:26 AM
 
.By reading the congressman's comments it looks as if the bill was passed in a very sneaky
way. This is extra scary to me. They passed the Patriot Act and the Patriot Act II in a similarly
sneaky way and they're using them to do some pretty bad things. Now that /seems/ to be
pointed directly at us - the internet users.

This could be very bad news if you're under 20 and haven't figured out how to act civil online
yet - we all know the types - or are just very opinionated like myself. In the former case these
kids are only immature loud-mouths and won't be deserving of the kinds of life altering
experiences they may be in for with this.

This is about HR 1955 which resembles the patriot act in too many ways - And it's directed at
individuals (that's you and I!) on the internet. Now I feel downright singled out. Here's the Wiki
link but with all the censorship (Political and History "revisions") they have undertaken in the
in 2006 I doubt it will say anything significant - at least for very long
Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Here's some interesting (and scary) quotes from the bill:
  • SEC. 899A (2) VIOLENT RADICALIZATION- The term `violent radicalization' means the process of adopting or promoting an extremist belief system for the purpose of facilitating ideologically based violence to advance political, religious, or social change.”

  • SEC. 899B. (3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens.”

  • SEC. 899A. (4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically-based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs.”

What do you think?

Should we be worried?

Feel free to pass this link (or the post in it's entirety) around where you like.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 11:52 AM
 
It's too late to be worried - that should have happened at about the time when Patriot Act I was being rushed through (when people were being called a terra-ist for disagreeing.)

This should be in the PL.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 12:08 PM
 
Just more Big_government_Anti-Civil_Liberties_Conservatism.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 12:11 PM
 
I thought "less government involvement" was supposed to be the Conservative base?
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 12:16 PM
 
Me too, but that went out a long time ago...
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 12:28 PM
 
Support the EFF.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 01:03 PM
 
Yes, this should be in the PL.

But...

SEC. 899A. (4) IDEOLOGICALLY BASED VIOLENCE- The term `ideologically-based violence' means the use, planned use, or threatened use of force or violence by a group or individual to promote the group or individual's political, religious, or social beliefs.”
First American to not pay his taxes and then use this new legislation against the arresting parties gets many brownie points. Because surely, arresting you for not paying taxes is use of violent force to promote their (the people who believe in taxes) social beliefs.

Good luck fellas.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 01:09 PM
 
Yeah, but none of the restrictions imposed by Congress ever restrict the federal government, right?

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 01:13 PM
 
Seems like there's no need to move this to the PL, right? We all think this sucks?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 01:16 PM
 
PL, please.

But for the record, neither Democratic or Republican parties are too concerned with small government anymore.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: eating kernel
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 01:30 PM
 
So, basically it means that if you don't agree with what the government agrees as OK online, then you're silenced?

Communist China anyone?
Signature depreciated.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 01:32 PM
 
Communist China is the goal of Conservative America.
     
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 01:57 PM
 
Commerica, isn't that a Wesley Snoops flick? We NEED Wesley Snoops!!
ice
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 02:54 PM
 
Originally Posted by peeb View Post
Communist China is the goal of Conservative America.
Yeah.. We even have the One Child Policy half way implemented.



PS: Sorry about posting in the wrong place. If a mod wants to move it that would be fine.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 93
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 03:24 PM
 
Prepare the anal probe!









oops, is this the wrong thread?

93 93/93
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 03:38 PM
 
People that follow this sorta **** have seen this happening for years and years. You're well past the point where you can "worry".

I'd advise getting the **** out before people start publicly being reprimanded for harbouring seditious thoughts.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: 93
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 03:41 PM
 
Originally Posted by Cipher13 View Post
People that follow this sorta **** have seen this happening for years and years. You're well past the point where you can "worry".

I'd advise getting the **** out before people start publicly being reprimanded for harbouring seditious thoughts.
That's it! No anal probe for you, mister!

93 93/93
     
abe
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 04:01 PM
 


Meek as a lamb.
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 04:03 PM
 
^ Oh, shut up.

Originally Posted by Shaddim View Post
That's it! No anal probe for you, mister!


You're well past the point where you can "worry".
I didn’t know there was such a thing.
     
abe
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 04:19 PM
 
Originally Posted by Oisín View Post
^ Oh, shut up.
"Baaaa," he bleated.
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 04:29 PM
 
Originally Posted by Tesselator View Post
Yeah.. We even have the One Child Policy half way implemented.
Yeah, but at least with only One Child the OLPC program will much more easily succeed.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 04:32 PM
 
Originally Posted by abe View Post
"Baaaa," he bleated.
He's Scottish?
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
abe
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 04:40 PM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
He's Scottish?
I dunno.



Meek.
America should know the political orientation of government officials who might be in a position to adversely influence the future of this country. http://tinyurl.com/4vucu5
     
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: We come from the land of the ice and snow...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 23, 2008, 05:25 PM
 
we need a cuckoo's nest thread, I think.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:23 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2