Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > And so it starts...

And so it starts...
Thread Tools
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 11:50 AM
 
Just been to the mail box:

Important: Please respond to this letter by 26th February to avoid your details being passed on to our Enforcement Division for investigation.

Dear Occupier,
Our database lists this address as unlicensed. It is important you realise that it is now illegal to use television receiving equipment to watch or record programmes at this property, and this will remain the situation until it is adequately licensed.

Please respond by 26th February to avoid an investigation into your case by TV Licensing's Enforcement Division. The consequences of such an investigation can be serious.

What if you do not use TV equipment at this address?

Please call us on 0844 800 5888 and let us know. We will schedule a visit to confirm the situation, following which we will update our records.

What will the procedure be if you do not respond by the above date?

Your details will be prepared for transfer to our Enforcement Division for investigation. Regional Officers will be scheduled to visit your address. If they find evidence that TV receiving equipment is being used on the property without a valid licence, you may be cautioned and your statement will be taken in accordance with the Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984. You may face prosecution and risk the maximum penalty of a £1,000 fine.

In order to avoid first steps in the investigation stage, please ensure your home is properly licensed urgently.

Yours faithfully,
blah blah blah
Customer Service
TV Licensing
Interesting. The only way to let them know that I haven't got a TV is to call a premium rate number and then let them into my house to check that I'm telling the truth.

Since I'm going to do neither (TV Licensing does *not* vet its enforcement staff for criminal records), this should be a fun ride.

(Yes, my colonial cousins - you require a TV licence to watch TV in this fetid sinkhole of a country. And since *everyone* must *obviously* have a TV, everyone must have a licence, right?)
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 11:55 AM
 
Good luck with that. In one island nation in the Atlantic they've done away with hunting people and now are just going to tax every person with an annual TV tax.

You only have to exist, who cares if you own a TV or not. Count your blessings.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 12:02 PM
 
I've had about four of those letters. We have a tv and only use it for xbox 360.
we don't have time to stop for gas
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 01:15 PM
 
Police and Criminal Evidence Acts 1984
The act was passed in 1984?!
That is a neat little bit of irony.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 01:36 PM
 
wait, that's a legit letter? at first glance i thought that was a scam where they got you to call a premium number (like a 900 number here in the states) and then stalled, keeping you on the phone and jacking up their profit.

heh, that'd be a pretty good scam actually.

e: for the sake of curiosity, how much is the tv license?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 01:46 PM
 
This is crazy. Poop on that.

That's it...I'm becoming a libertarian.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 02:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by d4nth3m4n View Post
wait, that's a legit letter? at first glance i thought that was a scam where they got you to call a premium number (like a 900 number here in the states) and then stalled, keeping you on the phone and jacking up their profit.
Yup, legit. From TV Licensing - a department of the BBC.

More stories of fun and games at Abolish the TV Licence [ www.tvlicensing.biz ] - I've spent the afternoon there getting myself armed.

Originally Posted by d4nth3m4n View Post
e: for the sake of curiosity, how much is the tv license?
About $280 a year.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 02:28 PM
 


Only in Amaraca Germany, UK and other European countries

This is one of the reasons I left the old world. Darn communists.

-t
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 02:39 PM
 
Is this a government license or a BBC scam? If it was the government, couldn't they determine who owns TV's when the TV's are purchased?

Do they also have a license for VCR's and iPods?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 02:40 PM
 
My deepest sympathies Doofy, that is totally outrageous.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 03:07 PM
 
Is that per TV or for the entire home?
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 03:13 PM
 
Originally Posted by Buckaroo View Post
Is this a government license or a BBC scam? If it was the government, couldn't they determine who owns TV's when the TV's are purchased?
It's a government backed licence. And it's a scam.

They have a database of every property in the country and run matches against their database of people with a TV licence. And then automatically assume that everyone without a licence is watching TV illegally.

Also, when you buy a TV the retailer must, by law, hand your details over to TVL. Much fun can be had by paying first and then refusing to give details.

Originally Posted by Buckaroo View Post
Do they also have a license for VCR's and iPods?
VCRs, yes (has a built in tuner). iPods, no. Not yet anyway.

Originally Posted by osiris View Post
My deepest sympathies Doofy, that is totally outrageous.
No worries, no need for sympathy. Since I don't own a TV (and thus am totally in the clear) I'm gonna play around with them a little.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 03:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chongo View Post
Is that per TV or for the entire home?
Per property. Unless it's subdivided (as it would be in student residence halls) and then it's per room.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 03:40 PM
 
Doofy, you shouldn't complain.

In Germany, those fsckers make you pay for the license even if you don't own a TV, but just a computer.

They say that you can receive some of the public broadcast material via the internet, streaming, so you technically own a "TV capable" device.

-t
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 06:07 PM
 
I see that it isn't going to get any better for you over there.

BBC NEWS | UK | UK Politics | '10 licence to smoke' proposed
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 06:33 PM
 
If you see one of these at your door, it's all over....



TV Detection vans!

If you can't beat them, though, why not join them?

(Last edited by Dork.; Feb 16, 2008 at 06:39 PM. )
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 07:30 PM
 
£28k is pretty good
we don't have time to stop for gas
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 07:47 PM
 
Originally Posted by Peter View Post
£28k is pretty good
Don't forget the "generous uncapped incentive scheme" - i.e. the more people you harass the more bonus you get.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 08:21 PM
 
Originally Posted by Buckaroo View Post
I see that it isn't going to get any better for you over there.

BBC NEWS | UK | UK Politics | '�10 licence to smoke' proposed
I wish someone would give these people something constructive to do so they'd stop inventing new laws and other rubbish all the time.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 08:50 PM
 
Originally Posted by turtle777 View Post
Doofy, you shouldn't complain.

In Germany, those fsckers make you pay for the license even if you don't own a TV, but just a computer.

They say that you can receive some of the public broadcast material via the internet, streaming, so you technically own a "TV capable" device.

-t
They officially changed it here, so it’s no longer a television license, but a ‘media’ license.

That means you’re obliged to pay if you have any kind of device that can pick up any kind of multimedia broadcasting (including Internet access), including—but not limited to—televisions, radios, computers, mobile phones, iPods, and even clocks that automatically fetch the correct time from an Internet server.

The licence is about $450 per year.

Bloodsuckers.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 16, 2008, 10:24 PM
 
I take it that means $450 for all your devices? It's like a tax? It sucks bad enough, but it would really suck if you had to pay it for each device.




Originally Posted by Oisín View Post
They officially changed it here, so it’s no longer a television license, but a ‘media’ license.

That means you’re obliged to pay if you have any kind of device that can pick up any kind of multimedia broadcasting (including Internet access), including—but not limited to—televisions, radios, computers, mobile phones, iPods, and even clocks that automatically fetch the correct time from an Internet server.

The licence is about $450 per year.

Bloodsuckers.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: CO
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 04:27 AM
 
The *real* tax on TV is having to suffer through 300+ channels of ::yawn:: & ::gross::

I weep to be out of reception range.

[ On the other hand: what the OP describes is no more a TV tax than a lung tax: "Someone live there. That'll be $xxx.xx, thank you very much." [ Flat tax ]
TOMBSTONE: "He's trashed his last preferences"
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 02:17 PM
 
So this is the latest tax fad sweeping western Europe, huh? Quick, someone cover Congress's ears before our Congress critters find out their cousins across the pond have an amazing new racket going!

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 02:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
So this is the latest tax fad sweeping western Europe, huh?
Apparently, some 70% of Brits want it gone.

For me, the main problem is to do with the enforcement procedures (they can break down your door while you're out to check that you're not telling porkies about not having a TV).
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 02:32 PM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
Apparently, some 70% of Brits want it gone.

For me, the main problem is to do with the enforcement procedures (they can break down your door while you're out to check that you're not telling porkies about not having a TV).
They can break in without a search warrant?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 02:33 PM
 
Sure they can. You didn't think the Constitution's Bill of Rights were enacted just for show, did you?

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 02:43 PM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
Sure they can. You didn't think the Constitution's Bill of Rights were enacted just for show, did you?
I was not aware that England had the Constitution's Bill of Rights.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 03:00 PM
 
Very funny.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 03:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by Buckaroo View Post
They can break in without a search warrant?
Well, they need to get a warrant, but they've been known to lie to the judge in order to acquire one. And then the law says they can enter whenever they feel like it, either on their own or with a copper.

Bear in mind that the company involved does no vetting of its staff for criminal records. So effectively, the law is giving your house keys to someone who might have been to prison for burglary in the past year and hoping that they won't take their own TV in there with them to "fit you up".

It's crazy.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 03:38 PM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
Bear in mind that the company involved does no vetting of its staff for criminal records. So effectively, the law is giving your house keys to someone who might have been to prison for burglary in the past year and hoping that they won't take their own TV in there with them to "fit you up".
Well, that would do you just well, right ?

-t
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Markleville, IN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 04:00 PM
 
Originally Posted by Oisín View Post
They officially changed it here, so it’s no longer a television license, but a ‘media’ license.

That means you’re obliged to pay if you have any kind of device that can pick up any kind of multimedia broadcasting (including Internet access), including—but not limited to—televisions, radios, computers, mobile phones, iPods, and even clocks that automatically fetch the correct time from an Internet server.

The licence is about $450 per year.

Bloodsuckers.
450$ a year? Sorry for the language, but that is ****ed up ****.

Might as well have a toilet license too! Pay 400 bucks to take a ****!
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 04:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by kelso View Post
450$ a year? Sorry for the language, but that is ****ed up ****.

Might as well have a toilet license too! Pay 400 bucks to take a ****!
Don't forget, the $ is weak.

In Europa, you can hardly get a Happy Meal for $ 450

-t
     
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 04:59 PM
 
Originally Posted by Buckaroo View Post
I take it that means $450 for all your devices? It's like a tax? It sucks bad enough, but it would really suck if you had to pay it for each device.
Yes, it’s a per-household fee, not a per-unit fee. That would be impossible to pay, since nearly everyone has at least six or seven different units that qualify.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 05:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by kelso View Post
Might as well have a toilet license too! Pay 400 bucks to take a ****!
Oh shut up - don't be giving them ideas!

Heh. "Phoning the government" is sort of a standing euphemism around here - meaning "I've got to go phone the government to ask them if I can take a dump".
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 06:11 PM
 
What’s that a euphemism for?

I thought, at first glance, you meant that ‘phoning the government’ was a slang euphemism for taking a dump. “Excuse me, I need to go phone the government”.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 06:18 PM
 
Originally Posted by Oisín View Post
I thought, at first glance, you meant that ‘phoning the government’ was a slang euphemism for taking a dump. “Excuse me, I need to go phone the government”.
And thus are slang phrases created!
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 06:46 PM
 
Originally Posted by Oisín View Post
I thought, at first glance, you meant that ‘phoning the government’ was a slang euphemism for taking a dump.
Yep. I just over-explained it, that's all.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 07:01 PM
 
I phoned the government this just a few minutes ago.

"Specific knowledge on a topic usually demonstrates in-depth knowledge."
     
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: retired
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 09:02 PM
 
Un****ingbelievable!!!1!

I'd emigrate to Russia. What a reversal of sh!t.

No wonder guns are illegal on that little island.

Can't wait to see how sharia works out.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 09:36 PM
 
Its the same in Japan. Theres a TV 'tax' for the national TV channel called NHK. They send little old ladies around to collect money from people, which is like $30 a month. The upside for me is that I play the dumb foreigner, ignore the letters, and realize that there is no enforcement behind any of it.

Which may explain why the channel is losing so much money these days. Japanese people are wising up to it.

I also don't watch Japanese TV and feel no guilt. I am dead on the inside.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 17, 2008, 11:13 PM
 
I have also received about 4 or 5 of those letters threatening an "embarrassing trial" and a potential fine of several thousand grand. For the record, we had no TV in our flat. We're students, we use computers.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 18, 2008, 12:53 AM
 
70s Public Information Film - TV Detector Van

I seem to remember Monty Python doing a skit on the BBC TV vans.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 18, 2008, 05:23 AM
 
What's funny is those vans were completely fake, they just called at houses without registered licenses and TV aerials on the roof.

Don't get me started on those fake buttons they put there for pedestrians on road crossings.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 18, 2008, 09:57 AM
 
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ View Post
Its the same in Japan. Theres a TV 'tax' for the national TV channel called NHK. They send little old ladies around to collect money from people, which is like $30 a month. The upside for me is that I play the dumb foreigner, ignore the letters, and realize that there is no enforcement behind any of it.

Which may explain why the channel is losing so much money these days. Japanese people are wising up to it.

I also don't watch Japanese TV and feel no guilt. I am dead on the inside.
Domokun is NHK's Mascot
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2008, 01:08 PM
 
would you need a license for something like Sky Angel?
Sky Angel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2008, 01:17 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chongo View Post
would you need a license for something like Sky Angel?
Sky Angel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yup. We need a licence to watch any TV show from anywhere on the planet using any means - as long as we're watching as it's being broadcast. Video-on-demand and torrents are therefore exempt.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2008, 01:20 PM
 
I've looked at this thread several times, but I'm no less astounded at how ridiculous this is. No wonder you love ranting against the modern UK.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2008, 01:40 PM
 
Originally Posted by JoshuaZ View Post
Its the same in Japan. Theres a TV 'tax' for the national TV channel called NHK. They send little old ladies around to collect money from people, which is like $30 a month. The upside for me is that I play the dumb foreigner, ignore the letters, and realize that there is no enforcement behind any of it.

Which may explain why the channel is losing so much money these days. Japanese people are wising up to it.

I also don't watch Japanese TV and feel no guilt. I am dead on the inside.
TimeWarner in NYC wants $60 a month just for NHK, and I recently lost Fujisankei $30 sounds appealing under these circumstances.

Here in the states there is no TV tax per se, but rather you pay through the nose for services and taxes, which at the moment is nearing 150 a month for a decent channel package and an internet hookup that is claimed to be 10mb (but is really 2-8 on a good day)
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2008, 02:02 PM
 
Originally Posted by osiris View Post
Here in the states there is no TV tax per se, but rather you pay through the nose for services and taxes, which at the moment is nearing 150 a month for a decent channel package and an internet hookup that is claimed to be 10mb (but is really 2-8 on a good day)
Pay through the nose? Don't be deluding yourself.

A decent channel package and a decent internet hookup that's claimed to be 8 mb (but is really 2.5 on a good day) would set me back about $260 a month. On top of the licence fee.

If it wasn't for the controlled foreign corporation legislation currently going through I'd be so there.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 19, 2008, 02:10 PM
 
$260? Yikes. But how many channels on cheese manufacturing does that include?
     
 
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2