 |
 |
ACID3 test is now available
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: I NY
Status:
Online
|
|

^ Safari 3.0.4 (5523.15) -- 10.5.2

^ Firefox 3 Beta 3
I like that the Acid 3 text has a drop shadow on it. It'll be nice when other browsers support the text-shadow css tag.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Online
|
|
Firefox 2.0.0.12

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: I NY
Status:
Online
|
|

^ Internet Explorer 7

^ Internet Explorer 6
iPhone gets to 27 and then displays a bunch of XML over the page.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Montréal, Québec (Canada)
Status:
Offline
|
|
Camino 1.5.5
iCab 4.0.1 is identical to Safari 3.0.4
I was wondering, is this test a chicken and egg situation? How come so many "modern" web browser fail this test miserably?
|
|
- iMac 2.4 Ghz Core 2 Duo 20" (mid-2007), 3 GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.6.2
- iMac G4 17" Flat Panel, 1 Ghz, 1.5 GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.4.11
- 7300/200, 128 MB, Seagate 9 GB, Quantum 1 GB, 15" CRT, Mac OS 9.2.2
- iPhone 3G [Rogers], 16 GB, firmware 3.1.2
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by FireWire
I was wondering, is this test a chicken and egg situation? How come so many "modern" web browser fail this test miserably?
The test seems to be aimed at a lot of edge cases that aren't used all that often and thus are most likely not to work right.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: eating kernel
Status:
Offline
|
|
EDIT: changed it to be more appropriate to the thread. 
(Last edited by C.A.T.S. CEO; Mar 3, 2008 at 01:24 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Uhhh, please leave the humor to the professionals -- or read the thread first, at least.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
So, is this another useless test?
Or should we think ACID2 is useful? (Asking. Not being sarcastic.)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
ACID2 wasn't useless since it motivated browser vendors to improve standards compliance. Including Microsoft even (although you will never see it since IE8 will ship with the IE7 engine as the default). For the same reason ACID3 is not useless.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
But ACID2 compliance isn't really the same thing as global standards compliance.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
No, it's not, but fixing bugs exposed by ACID2 improves global standards compliance. Ditto for ACID3.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Acid tests are useful, in my opinion, because they give an easy visual mark for browser users to aim for. It doesn't guarantee compliance to the whole standard, but it encourages people to move in the right way.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
What I always wondered is why there weren't say ACID tests 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, etc.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
What I always wondered is why there weren't say ACID tests 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, etc.
I guess I don't get what you are driving at.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pueblo Bavaro, Dominican Republic
Status:
Offline
|
|
How do they know what the ACID3 test is supposed to look like when no browser can rendering it correctly.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Online
|
|
There's a picture to compare to of what it's supposed to look like.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Atheist
How do they know what the ACID3 test is supposed to look like when no browser can rendering it correctly.
Because it's written to the standards?
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Atheist
How do they know what the ACID3 test is supposed to look like when no browser can rendering it correctly.
"No browser currently exists which gets a 100% score, obviously. However, the specifications are precise enough (and Ian Hickson who created the Acid3 test is knowledgeable enough) that it can be deduced how the test should render. (Although there’s always a tiny chance that a flaw in the test is found at some stage and that it will need to be updated; this happened at some point in Acid2, too, iirc.)"
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TETENAL
I guess I don't get what you are driving at.
ACID3 is simply one test.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: eating kernel
Status:
Offline
|
|
Opera 9.26:
iCab 4.0.1:

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pueblo Bavaro, Dominican Republic
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Because it's written to the standards?
It was an attempt at irony. Kinda like how can the C compiler be written in C?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: eating kernel
Status:
Offline
|
|
WebKit Nightly 3/5/08:
10 more to go!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: I NY
Status:
Online
|
|
Latest Webkit nightly results.
If you click the A in Acid3 you'll get an alert explaining what happened. If you shift+click the A you'll get a page with the same explanation.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: I NY
Status:
Online
|
|
IE8 Beta
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here's a MobileSafari snapshot:
I used the site The Acid3 Test as the one mentioned here had some server issues.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Acid3 browser scores - Safari takes the lead
Well... Sorta. That's the beta. The Safari release version is way behind the Firefox and Camino release versions.
Interestingly, IE 5.5 (just barely) beats both IE 6 and IE 7.
Browser Version Operating System Acid 3 Score
Safari WebKit Nightly (r30881) Mac OS X 10.5.2 90%
Safari†† 3.1 (5525.15) Mac OS X 10.5.2 74%
Camino 2.0a1pre nightly (1.9b5pre 2008030800) Mac OS X 10.5.2 69%
Firefox 3.0b5pre nightly (2008030804) Mac OS X 10.5.2 69%
Firefox 3.0b5pre nightly (2008030904) CentOS 5 69%
Seamonkey 2.0a1pre nightly (2008030801) Mac OS X 10.5.2 69%
Konqueror† 4.0.2 Ubuntu 7.10 62%
Opera 9.50 Beta (build 9613) Windows Vista 60%
Opera 9.50 Beta (build 4506) Mac OS X 10.5.2 60%
Firefox 3.0b3 (2008020511) Mac OS X 10.5.2 59%
Firefox 3.0b3 (2008020514) Windows Vista 58%
Firefox 2.0.0.12 (20080201) Mac OS X 10.5.2 52%
Firefox 2.0.0.12 (20080201) Windows XP Service Pack 2 52%
Firefox 2.0.0.12 (20080201) CentOS 5 51%
Epiphany‡‡ 2.20.1 Ubuntu 7.10 51%
Konqueror‡ 3.5.9 Gentoo 51%
Camino 1.5.5 Mac OS X 10.5.2 50%
Opera 9.26 Mac OS X 10.5.2 46%
Opera 9.26 Windows Vista 46%
iCab 4.0.1 Mac OS X 10.5.2 39%
Safari 3.0.4 (5523.15) * Mac OS X 10.5.2 39%
Safari 3.0.4 (523.15) * Windows Vista 39%
Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.17184 (Beta) Windows Vista 17%
Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.17184 (Beta) Windows XP Service Pack 2 17%
Internet Explorer 5.50.4807.2300 (SP2) Windows XP Service Pack 2 (Multiple IE) 14%
Internet Explorer 5.50.4807.2300 (SP2) Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 13%
Internet Explorer 7.0.5730.13 Windows XP Service Pack 2 12%
Internet Explorer 7.0.6000.16609 Windows Vista 12%
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows XP Service Pack 2 12%
Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows 2000 Service Pack 4 11%
Konqueror 3.5.8 Linux Mint 4.0 (Crashed)
-----
P.S. The Acid3 test page weighs in at 176 KB, while the Acid3 demo reference page weighs in at only 4 KB.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just in time for I.E. to pass ACID2!
|
|
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Portage, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by goMac
Just in time for I.E. to pass ACID2!
 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: :ИOITAↃO⅃
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
ACID3 is simply one test.
Not sure what you mean by this -- it's more like a test suite, isn't it?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
WebKit of March 17th.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Safari 3.1 on 10.5.2 gives 74/100.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I get 75/100 with v3.1 on 10.5.2
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, NY
Status:
Online
|
|
I got 74 then 75 after reloading 3.1 on 10.5.2. The different scores from reloading is a known bug.
|
|
Vandelay Industries
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Status:
Offline
|
|
WebKit + Tiger on a G4 Powerbook = 89
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Art Vandelay
I got 74 then 75 after reloading 3.1 on 10.5.2. The different scores from reloading is a known bug.
Bug of the browser or bug of the ACID3 test?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, NY
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
Bug of the browser or bug of the ACID3 test?
Sorry, Webkit.
|
|
Vandelay Industries
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
WebKit of March 22 reaches 95/100.
WebKit now also supports full page zoom. I very much prefer this over text zoom. To turn this on (instead of text zoom) in WebKit type the following line into Terminal:
defaults write com.apple.Safari WebKitDebugFullPageZoomPreferenceKey 1
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: :ИOITAↃO⅃
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TETENAL
WebKit now also supports full page zoom. I very much prefer this over text zoom.
I like it too, but on some sites (such as MacNN), zooming makes weird seams in the background images:

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TETENAL
WebKit now also supports full page zoom. I very much prefer this over text zoom. To turn this on (instead of text zoom) in WebKit type the following line into Terminal:
defaults write com.apple.Safari WebKitDebugFullPageZoomPreferenceKey 1
I just updated today and it had full page zoom by default.
I got a 91 on 10.4.11
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Four more point to go!

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LV-426
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|

“Building Better Worlds”
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status:
Offline
|
|
came for the grateful dead and the pranksters, left when i realized this belonged in the software forum.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
(Last edited by TETENAL; Mar 26, 2008 at 09:22 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: :ИOITAↃO⅃
Status:
Offline
|
|
But does it count if you can't download it?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Online
|
|
No, it doesn’t. If the Webkit available for download in two days gets 100/100 and the version of Opera seen in that screenshot isn’t available for download for another three days, Webkit still ‘wins’.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Since I have now graduated from college, I shall be living in CA from now on.
Status:
Offline
|
|
thank you for that link tetenal!! i a now running the latest build of the webkit. sooo much faster
|
|
This signature is top secret.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
I get a 98/100 with the latest WebKit r31356. On the plus side Saft now works with WebKit nightlies. Nice 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|