Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > The Official High Def Thread

The Official High Def Thread
Thread Tools
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 11:10 AM
 
Ok, as someone said, the only way for a thread to die is to stop posting in it. In order for that to happen, there needs to be another one. Here it is.

What HD setup do you have? Still buying HD-DVD?
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 11:20 AM
 
I was at a Best Buy the last week and they had a big bin of HD_DVD's at half price. It didn't look like anyone was interested.
Stay Home Sunday ... Save 10%!
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 11:23 AM
 
Official. How... laughable.

Hate You Can Trust
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Why do you care?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 11:52 AM
 
TV: 47" Sharp Aquos (1080p)
Receiver: Yamaha V-1700
Speakers: Infinity Primus 360s (L/R), Infinity Primus 160s (Surround), Infinity C25 (C), and Infinity P10 (Sub)
HD-DVD: Toshiba XA-2
Blu-ray: Sony 60GB PS-3
Digital Content/Music: AppleTV

Just purchased the last five HD-DVDs I wanted last week. All purchases will be on Blu-ray from here on out.

Going to upgrade from COX cable to Verizon FIOS when they finish hooking up our neighborhood in a month or so.
17" 2.16 GHz Intel Core Duo MacBookPro --- Best Mac I ever owned!
17" 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo iMac
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 11:54 AM
 
I have a 32" 720P Samsung. I'm not running any hi-def programming yet, that is I've not upgraded my satellite to HD and I'm looking to get a blu-ray player. As I posted in my earlier thread, the odds are pretty good that I'll pony up the dough for a PS3 since that will give me a blu-ray player and the ability to play games (plus wireless access).
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 11:58 AM
 
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:00 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
Official. How... laughable.
You're just upset you didn't come up with the idea first
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frantic Oblivion
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:07 PM
 
I've been holding out until after the format battles are over.
Now I'm waiting for HD TV on all channels, for it pains me to watch stretched-out talking heads and over-pixelated movies.
I currently own a Sony 720p tube with a decent surround sound system that makes the windows rattle, but the next screen will be thin, flat and super wide.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:18 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
Official. How... laughable.
Quoted for truth.

All glory to the hypnotoad.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Detroit
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by osiris View Post
I've been holding out until after the format battles are over.
Now I'm waiting for HD TV on all channels, for it pains me to watch stretched-out talking heads and over-pixelated movies.
I currently own a Sony 720p tube with a decent surround sound system that makes the windows rattle, but the next screen will be thin, flat and super wide.
HD TV on all channels huh? you will die before that happens. and if you (or someone else reading this) thinks the digital transition in 2009 = HD, please read up some more. it doesn't mean HD broadcasting.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:29 PM
 
Samsung 32" LN-T3253H LCD HDTV set (720p "native" resolution)
Oppo DV-980H upconverting DVD player
PlayStation 3 (60-gig with hardware-based backward compatibility)

Could someone explain how, in 2008, high definition cable television is not available in my building? High definition television sets are no longer luxury items.

I bought an antenna so that I would at least be able to view local channels in high definition, but picking up channels is difficult and erratic due to the many skyscrapers and high rises in the area (I can't get CBS' local digital channel unless I hold the antenna in my hand and stand in a specific spot, despite that it transmits from a skyscraper not even two blocks away..)
(Last edited by BasketofPuppies; Apr 8, 2008 at 12:51 PM )
inscrutable impenetrable impregnable inconceivable
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frantic Oblivion
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:35 PM
 
Originally Posted by residentEvil View Post
and if you (or someone else reading this) thinks the digital transition in 2009 = HD, please read up some more. it doesn't mean HD broadcasting.
Only an idiot would think that. Digital broadcast does not equal HD.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:45 PM
 
I've got an Aquos 32" 720p, no cable or satellite or tivo or hi-def DVD players or speakers or nuthin'. I get over-the-air broadcast, very little of which is in hi def, and I have a bazillion downloaded TV shows and movies accessible from my computer via AppleTV, almost none of which are hi def.

I watched Michael Clayton last night in HD rented via AppleTV, and it didn't seem much different than regular DVDs - which are fine as far as I'm concerned anyway.
"I would like the next president not to talk about deficit reduction." - John McCain's chief economic advisor.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:55 PM
 
I have a Samsung 40" 1080p LCD TV and a PS3 at the moment. Speakers are next on the list though the sound is certainly acceptable to our ears.

Movies on blu-ray are awesome. And as I just got cable installed - baseball (and basketball games ) in HD are way awesome.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 12:59 PM
 
At the moment my roomie (and condo owner) has only an old-school 32" tube in our living room, but we'd (and by "we" I mean "I'm all for it if he'll do it") like to try for, say, a 42" HDTV Sharp for next year. From the way things are going it looks like similar models should be closing in on the 1k mark by next September.

The real issue we were looking at is on the surround sound front. Currently we've just got a couple (very shitty) mains and an ancient shitty amp for some stereo sound. Surround would be nice, but there's no way to run wires in the condo; the floors are all hardwood and it's relatively open-spaced, so unless you ripped up the floors/walls/mouldings there's no way you're stringing wires to the rear.

What's the wireless tech like nowadays? Is it crazy expensive? I know some computer speakers were going that way for rears a few years ago, but I wonder if it could be done cheaply on a stereo system?

greg
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 01:06 PM
 
Originally Posted by osiris View Post
Only an idiot would think that. Digital broadcast does not equal HD.
I wouldn't say that. It only takes a minute of research to learn that digital vs. analog is one thing and SD vs. HD is entirely another, but it comes naturally to people like us who've dealt with technology stuff our whole lives.

Anyway, I have a 27" CRT TV that was manufactured in 1992. My Wii's hooked up to it through S-Video. But I'm upgrading! In a couple weeks I'll have a 32" CRT that was manufactured in 1996! I also don't even have an antenna for the thing, so it's really just a monitor.

Eventually I'll be able to afford an HDTV. Maybe by then, 30"+ sets won't be as expensive as they are now and 720p will finally be giving way to 1080p.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frantic Oblivion
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 01:10 PM
 
Originally Posted by Luca Rescigno View Post
I wouldn't say that. It only takes a minute of research to learn that digital vs. analog is one thing and SD vs. HD is entirely another, but it comes naturally to people like us who've dealt with technology stuff our whole lives.

Anyway, I have a 27" CRT TV that was manufactured in 1992. My Wii's hooked up to it through S-Video. But I'm upgrading! In a couple weeks I'll have a 32" CRT that was manufactured in 1996! I also don't even have an antenna for the thing, so it's really just a monitor.

Eventually I'll be able to afford an HDTV. Maybe by then, 30"+ sets won't be as expensive as they are now and 720p will finally be giving way to 1080p.
I was a bit harsh, perhaps the techno babble is taken for granted to some.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 01:18 PM
 
Oh goodie. another good use for BR-live.... a shitty game:
Sony Sets Specs, BD-Live for 'MIB' Blu-ray | High-Def Digest
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 01:57 PM
 
I have no HD setup, I have a nice monitor, and might get an EyeTV when I move out so I can run TV to my laptop... honestly though I don't get why people worry so much about video quality, I'll watch it on YouTube if the story's good enough.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 8, 2008, 02:30 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
Official. How... laughable.
but it is Offical, not Official, he was smart enough to avoid the hyped, overrated and yet a classic 'Official' cliché

if you looked up CUTE chances are a photo of ^^ would be right next to the definition