 |
 |
Blast from the Aqua past... what were they thinking?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sint Maarten, Netherlands Antilles
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just went to download the latest version of Xcode and was presented with this sign in page:
Check out that early Aqua style button. I remember when I thought that look was cool. In retrospect it's rather garish.
Where you an early Aqua fan?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, but those buttons always looked weird and smudgy to me.
|
|
Chuck
___
"But what if it I have a disease of it hurts?"
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sint Maarten, Netherlands Antilles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Yes, but those buttons always looked weird and smudgy to me.
Most definitely. The shadows on the letters was WAY over the top.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status:
Online
|
|
Migrating from platinum to aqua, yes they looked "cool" but I agree that they do look garish
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd like to see Apple do away with those pill buttons and use something like is in the iPhone interface.

|

I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Status:
Online
|
|
Was there ever a drop shadow on the text on actual system buttons or was this a web thing? There was always huge discrepancies between "web-aqua" and system aqua.

DP4

Public Beta

Cheetah (10.0)
(Last edited by - - e r i k - - : Apr 17, 2008 at 07:14 PM
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Status:
Offline
|
|
Part of me kind of misses the stripes from Jaguar.
|

SMT WTFS
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
Was there ever a drop shadow on the text on actual system buttons or was this a web thing? There was always huge discrepancies between "web-aqua" and system aqua.]
Cheetah (10.0)
How do you not see the drop shadow there?
|
MacBook Pro 2.2 GHz, 23" Apple Cinema Display, 8 GB iPod Touch, Apple Wireless Keyboard and Mighty Mouse, Airport Extreme Base Station
adamfishercox.com
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by adamfishercox
How do you not see the drop shadow there?
In the actual buttons of the Public Beta? I'm having trouble seeing what you're seeing.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
There's drop shadows on the DP4 buttons, on the Public Beta Menu bar, but there are no pill buttons seen in the public beta screenshot.
|
MacBook Pro 2.2 GHz, 23" Apple Cinema Display, 8 GB iPod Touch, Apple Wireless Keyboard and Mighty Mouse, Airport Extreme Base Station
adamfishercox.com
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by adamfishercox
There's drop shadows on the DP4 buttons, on the Public Beta Menu bar, but there are no pill buttons seen in the public beta screenshot.
There's two in the "Mac Help" window, and the text in them has no drop shadows.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: München, Deutschland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Atheist
Were you an early Aqua fan?
No, never. I didn't like the GUI and the technical presentation layer (full scale anti-alias) from the first moment. I've always been a fan of the classical OS7, OS8, OS9 pixel-for-pixel style, that's much better for 2D graphic work, DTP etc. I wished they would have brought that sort of GUI into the 21st century...
Regards,
PB.
|
|
Aut Caesar aut nihil.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Aluminum iMac 2GHz/3GB RAM/250GB Hard Drive - Mac OS X 10.5.2 + Windows Vista Home Premium SP1
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Online
|
|
I have to admit: I've always really like Aqua. Although I've been very pleased with the way they've toned it down over the years.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm getting fed up with the aqua buttons. i've seen it too much on other people's websites as well.
|
|
{Animated sigs are not allowed.}
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
What we need are some images of graphical widgets from OS 9, System 7, and Windows 95. Lets put things in perspective, and those OS X 10.0 buttons will again look badass :-)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
OS 9:

|
|
Aluminum iMac 2GHz/3GB RAM/250GB Hard Drive - Mac OS X 10.5.2 + Windows Vista Home Premium SP1
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
I have to admit: I've always really like Aqua. Although I've been very pleased with the way they've toned it down over the years.
Same here. My one big disappointment was brushed metal in Tiger. I loved the ‘Unified’ theme that was predominant in Preview, Mail, System Preferences and such (a good example of it can be found here). Now, if they’d used that theme system-wide, including Finder and Safari, I would have been a very happy man. I thought it was nigh-on perfect (perhaps because I love pinstripes).
That said, I do like Leopard’s new homogenous interface—whilst it’s less ground-breaking than Aqua was/is, it’s nice to finally have something approaching consistency throughout OSX.
Loathe as I am to agree with John Siracusa, he was pretty much spot on when he said:
Originally Posted by John Siracusa
That's not to say that it was perfect—far from it. Some judged it too bright; the pinstripes were a bit too pronounced; translucency hindered legibility in some areas; the list went on. These flaws were slowly corrected with each subsequent revision of Mac OS X. But while these corrections improved the usability and (usually) the look of the OS, they also compromised the overall aesthetic design. What started as a (flawed) work of genius was patched and filled and tweaked by a committee of pragmatists, rendering it much improved, but considerably less inspired. ( Source.)
I think it’s important not to judge Aqua too harshly. Whilst it’s very easy to look back with almost eight years of experience and modification and denounce it as terrible, one has to remember just how incredibly different it was when it was released. I remember seeing it around about the time (still being a Windows ’95 user then) and thinking how incredible it was. Now, I likely wouldn’t be so easily impressed, but then I was blown-away.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle/Colorado Springs
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like Panther's Aqua the best. Very refined I think. In fact, I like it so much I use it everyday.

|
July 29, 2009
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by 64stang06
OS 9:
Looks pretty good, considering. I prefer OS X unified look, but that's way better than the atrocity that was Aqua.
Aqua dared to be different, but so did punks.

|

I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
System 7:

|
< | | |