Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > The greatest motorcycle ever? Or the stupidest?

The greatest motorcycle ever? Or the stupidest?
Thread Tools
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 07:54 AM
 
mental_floss Blog : The Uno



It runs on electricity and is controlled by body language. The only controls are an on-off switch. To go forward, you lean forward. Lean further to go faster. Lean back to go backwards. The Uno has two gyros, one to control forward (and backward) motion, the other for turning.
I didn't think a motorcycle could get any more dangerous. Or is it just me? I like that it is electric, however.
__________________________________________________

Play Food Fight! available free on the App Store!
Or how about a really weird (or stupid) game: Nesen Probe, it's also free.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 07:58 AM
 
*facepalm*
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 07:58 AM
 
Stupidest? Maybe, but then again all motorcycles are stupid from a safety point of view, and I say this as someone who owned one for a while.

Note that it does have two wheels though.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 08:07 AM
 
Paint it black and call it Batman's Segway.

Look after my manor, or I will bum you, literally, to death.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 08:31 AM
 
The BATWAY!

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 08:31 AM
 
And on a more serious note: It was about time someone took the segway technology forward from it's current derided "haha-scooter!" point.

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 08:32 AM
 
He's humping the 2 legged horse !
{Animated sigs are not allowed.}
     
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 08:49 AM
 
Actually, this is very very cool.

(a) the dude who made it is 18 years old. What were you doing at 18?

(b) probably going to be harder to ride with a passenger, since leaning is going to affect course and speed, and most passengers I've ridden with don't follow the instruction "lean exactly where I lean"

(c) I don't see how this is any more dangerous than a motorcycle at highway speeds - laying a bike down on the side versus endo-ing still means you're on the ground and liable to get run over by whatever traffic is behind you.

(d) I wonder how the DMV would classify it - if it's in the same class as a 50cc scooter, then it can be ridden without any license, tags, or insurance on public roads. (The DMV does this so that people who have lost their license to DUI/DWI offenses can ride scooters to work.)
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 08:56 AM
 
Lean further to go faster. Lean back to go backwards.
Oh dear. That's not going to be very quick with the average fat biker chick sitting on the back of it.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 09:07 AM
 
Since it uses gyros the guy probably got the idea from Mr. Garrison's IT.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 09:26 AM
 
Actually, it's lean backwards to decelerate. Course, you have to be moving forward in order to decelerate. Only from a stop would leaning backwards cause reverse.

Doofy's 'fat chick' on the back just causes you to go slower (both by mass, and by the act of leaning backwards.)
     
Eug
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 09:32 AM
 
Originally Posted by vmarks View Post
Doofy's 'fat chick' on the back just causes you to go slower (both by mass, and by the act of leaning backwards.)
Not necessarily. You might just accelerate slower.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 09:42 AM
 
Depends on how fat she is, and how far forward you can both get.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 09:44 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug View Post
Not necessarily. You might just accelerate slower.
If one is riding one of those things and one has a fat chick on the back, one has been accelerating pretty slowly for all of one's life.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 09:49 AM
 
OK, puzzled.

On a conventional bike, when you stop your body weight transfers forwards due to the laws of physics and the like. Hence "stoppies". But on this thing, leaning forwards actually accelerates the thing. So, you lean back to try and stop the thing and the sheer act of slowing down makes you lean forwards, which then accelerates the thing. Which throws your body weight backwards, which then tries to stop the thing. Which throws your weight forwards, which then makes it accelerate. Etc., etc..

They really didn't think this one through, did they?
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 09:57 AM
 
I assume it doesn't go fast enough for that to really be a problem. Otherwise the same would be true with segways.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 10:24 AM
 
So you lean back for brakes? What happens when you are going down a hill?
__________________________________________________

Play Food Fight! available free on the App Store!
Or how about a really weird (or stupid) game: Nesen Probe, it's also free.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 10:27 AM
 
I assume the gyros would keep you up relative to the direction of gravity regardless of the grade of the road.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 10:30 AM
 
Yes, but how would you slow down going down a hill?
__________________________________________________

Play Food Fight! available free on the App Store!
Or how about a really weird (or stupid) game: Nesen Probe, it's also free.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 10:36 AM
 
Same was as on the flat. Because it's gyroscopically stabilized it should feel no different to you (although you'll be at greater risk of the tail hitting the ground).
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 11:03 AM
 
So there must be some sort of resistance on the wheels? Maybe the motors generate when not powering? The article doesn't say anything about brakes, just leaning to go forward or back.

I would be really worried about brakes on something like this...just a tap and POW!
__________________________________________________

Play Food Fight! available free on the App Store!
Or how about a really weird (or stupid) game: Nesen Probe, it's also free.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 11:12 AM
 
It's exactly the same as a segway, you just sit on it instead of standing on it.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 11:29 AM
 
Originally Posted by nonhuman View Post
It's exactly the same as a segway, you just sit on it instead of standing on it.
Then it's not exact, is it?</total dick>
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 11:40 AM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
Then it's not exact, is it?</total dick>
It's EXACTLY the same but different.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 12:34 PM
 
Kinda neat, but seems rather pointless.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 12:40 PM
 
So what am I missing here - how do the brakes work?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 01:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by peeb View Post
So what am I missing here - how do the brakes work?
Apparently they don't. It's like a segway, only without all that pesky comfort.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 01:16 PM
 
Technically speaking, wouldn't you rather sit then stand?

But yeah, I think I'd be a little more apprehensive sitting. Not that I've ever tried either method of transportation.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 01:22 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
Technically speaking, wouldn't you rather sit then stand?

But yeah, I think I'd be a little more apprehensive sitting. Not that I've ever tried either method of transportation.
Sit? Maybe.

Sit bent over, straddling TWO wheels with my legs opened up like Jenna Jameson…not so much.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 01:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by smacintush View Post
Sit? Maybe.

Sit bent over, straddling TWO wheels with my legs opened up like Jenna Jameson…not so much.
You're right. Perhaps if they took Big Mac's advice and made it more like Mr. Garrison's IT.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 01:36 PM
 
Originally Posted by smacintush View Post
Apparently they don't. It's like a segway, only without all that pesky comfort.
Well that's ok if you're doing 3mph on a segway, but this looks like it's a bit faster, no?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 01:48 PM
 
Originally Posted by peeb View Post
Well that's ok if you're doing 3mph on a segway, but this looks like it's a bit faster, no?
Well it's powered by two wheelchair motors. Faster than a segway maybe, but hardly "fast". He claims that it will do 60 km/h eventually though.

"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 01:50 PM
 
In a stunning moment of nerd insight, I just realized the thing reminds me of a chocobo.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:06 PM
 
I had to look chocobo up. But you're right, it has the same stance, minus the wheelchair parts and lack of feathers, and beak.

The motor bike is pretty interesting, but I'd like to see a passenger vehicle (with a fully appointed interior) and room for 4 - all balanced on one wheel.
It begins to take on a Salvador Dali/Dr. Seuss charm once you move on to larger vehicles.
But kudos to the inventor.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:23 PM
 
Originally Posted by smacintush View Post
Well it's powered by two wheelchair motors. Faster than a segway maybe, but hardly "fast". He claims that it will do 60 km/h eventually though.
So how will it brake at 60mph?
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:26 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dakar the Fourth View Post
Then it's not exact, is it?</total dick>
I'm trying to come up with some amusing way of saying that I appreciate your sense of humor without it sounding like I like dick... and failing miserably.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:27 PM
 
Originally Posted by nonhuman View Post
I'm trying to come up with some amusing way of saying that I appreciate your sense of humor without it sounding like I like dick... and failing miserably.
That joke will suffice, Dr. Orpheus.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:28 PM
 
Originally Posted by peeb View Post
So how will it brake at 60mph?
'Just steer into a gravel driveway and fall down.'
     
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:28 PM
 
Originally Posted by peeb View Post
So how will it brake at 60mph?
It won't do 60 mph.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:28 PM
 
Originally Posted by peeb View Post
So how will it brake at 60mph?
Quoted in triplicate.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:31 PM
 
Originally Posted by peeb View Post
So how will it brake at 60mph?
That's about 37 in mp/h but yeah, that's a good question.

I think maybe this young whipper-snapper hasn't figured that out yet. Gonna be a tough nut to crack.

I don't think emergency braking would be possible at all. Not without becoming airborn.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:40 PM
 
To me this seems like a more grown-up, advanced version of the child inventors stuff.

It's cool and he deserves a lot of credit for his efforts but in the end he "invented" a sit down version of someone else's invention that borrows its looks from someone else's designs and I don't see it going anywhere.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:46 PM
 
Maybe it uses a drag chute for high speed braking.

Actually, thinking about the physics of it, it probably wouldn't be impossible to use traditional braking on this thing so long as the gyros were able to adequately compensate. It's basically a matter of torque: you have to be able to counterspin the body(?) sufficiently to overcome the inertia of braking.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:49 PM
 
****. What kind of size gyro would you need to stop the thing at 60kph?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:51 PM
 
You could do some sort of smart controlling of the gyros with a normal breaking system. Merely stopping is going to throw you forward, seem difficult.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:51 PM
 
I wonder how fast it'll go...
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by nonhuman View Post
Maybe it uses a drag chute for high speed braking.

Actually, thinking about the physics of it, it probably wouldn't be impossible to use traditional braking on this thing so long as the gyros were able to adequately compensate. It's basically a matter of torque: you have to be able to counterspin the body(?) sufficiently to overcome the inertia of braking.
Seems like a far-fetched idea to me. This thing is frakking top-heavy as hell with NO wheelbase for stability. I can't see how braking could ever really be adequate at higher speeds.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 02:55 PM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
OK, puzzled.

On a conventional bike, when you stop your body weight transfers forwards due to the laws of physics and the like. Hence "stoppies". But on this thing, leaning forwards actually accelerates the thing. So, you lean back to try and stop the thing and the sheer act of slowing down makes you lean forwards, which then accelerates the thing. Which throws your body weight backwards, which then tries to stop the thing. Which throws your weight forwards, which then makes it accelerate. Etc., etc..

They really didn't think this one through, did they?
It probably works fairly intuitively - like leaning back and pulling on the reins of a horse.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 03:04 PM
 
And someone will probably die on this thing very soon.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 29, 2008, 03:09 PM
 
Originally Posted by analogika View Post
It probably works fairly intuitively - like leaning back and pulling on the reins of a horse.
But the point is that when you lean back, and braking begins, you are thrown forward (relatively) with the force of deceleration. Since the thing pivots on one axel, that's a very difficult thing to control.
     
 
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2