 |
 |
Just try and cross the Candian/U.S. border with an iPod
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is from the CANADIAN side of things. You people that say "only in America" need to read this.
Essentially, it's making the information on iPods and laptops illegal.
The federal government is secretly negotiating an agreement to revamp international copyright laws which could make the information on Canadian iPods, laptop computers or other personal electronic devices illegal and greatly increase the difficulty of travelling with such devices.
Copyright deal could toughen rules governing info on iPods, computers
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status:
Offline
|
|
What's the concern here? That illegal bootlegs that anyone can download from the internet might come across the border physically?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
They said they can confiscate or destroy your device at THEIR discretion, so if you have a RIPPED CD (legal!) on your iPod or laptop, it can get taken from you.
This is complete bullsh*t.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: We come from the land of the ice and snow...
Status:
Offline
|
|
they're going to collect a lot of computers and ipods then. I mean, everyone has a ripped cd on their ipod. it's the whole point. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd like to know why the BORDER PATROL needs to be checking devices for copyright infringement that can be sent to the cloud and downloaded on the other side. This is silly, but if it goes through, it gives fat guys in uniforms that don't know the difference between ripping something legally or not the power to take your iPhone because of your TuPac ringtone which you legally downloaded.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh noes! But I love my Tupac ringtones!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by starman
This is from the CANADIAN side of things. You people that say "only in America" need to read this.
Essentially, it's making the information on iPods and laptops illegal.
Yes, it's stupid, but I thought it was a multinational stupidity.
Called the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), the new plan would see Canada join other countries, including the United States and members of the European Union, to form an international coalition against copyright infringement.
Furthermore:
In October, International Trade Minister David Emerson announced Canada would participate in ACTA's creation. The initiative was originally aimed at stopping large-scale piracy, such as printing operations that make thousands of copies of movies that are still in theatres.
"We are seeking to counter global piracy and counterfeiting more effectively," said Emerson at the time. "This government is working both at home and internationally to protect the intellectual property rights of Canadian artists, creators, inventors and investors."
The new document is reported to be drafted by the Office of the United States Trade Representative.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Further proof that government types (no matter the country) are complete imbeciles and don't understand digital lifestyles at all.
I'm not really sure what they're trying to accomplish with this. I'm REALLY not sure if they actually think this is doing the world any good at all.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status:
Offline
|
|
The question is, who pushed for this? Because they obviously have no idea how their stuff is getting pirated, either.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do songs purchased from the ITMS appear different than a ripped CD on an iPod?
[Sort of related, but probably derailment] If a police officer pull someone over and sees a case full of obviously ripped CD-Rs full of music, does he write a ticket for copyright infringement?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK, so now we can say it then...
Onl... Err... Pioneered in Amrerica!
EDIT:
Heh:
The Ottawa Citizen - Copyright deal
Re: Proposed secret copyright deal takes aim at iPods, providers, May 24.
As a former worker and member of a Riding Board of Directors for the Conservative Party, I feel have to apologize to all Canadians.
The new secret copyright deal clearly shows that this government does not care about personal privacy or about Canadians' right to debate and input their own laws. Instead they have cheerily given in to the unjustified demands of Hollywood and huge music companies.
I will now be donating my time, money and effort to whichever political party speaks loudest against this proposed bill.
Brian Newman,
Ottawa
(Last edited by Eug; May 29, 2008 at 12:15 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Alberta, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Biggest thing I'm concerned with is the fact they can search any electronic device that can potentially be used to hold a copyrighted item. The delays at the border are already rediculous but imagine if the border security actually went through everyones computer file by file or iPod song by song. That'd take forever and how would they be able to tell / verify if the item is pirated or not especially if someone buys the CD (or from iTMS) and doesn't carry a box of receipts around with them.
Wouldn't this also be considered unlawful search and seizure as well as destruction of personal property if they remove any information?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is it possible that they only put this law in effect to be able to successfully and effectively battle REAL copyright infringement cases, like someone trying to cross the border with bootlegs that would be for sale.
I can't imagine they are going to be checking people's individual iPods.
This would be so dumb, even the Americans Candians wouldn't do that.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by t6hawk
Wouldn't this also be considered unlawful search and seizure
If you're talking about the US Constitution, then no, it's not considered in violation. Federal courts have upheld that border searches have much greater latitude.
The only thing left somewhat unsettled is whether the US government can force you to turn over your encryption password in order to facilitate their search/seizure of your electronic property at a border crossing. In the UK, I think they have a law on the books already to penalize someone who doesn't turn over their encryption key on request.
What's also interesting is whether - again under US law and the Constitution - turning over encryption keys to unlock information that would implicate yourself in a crime would violate the 5th Amendment: your right against self-incrimination. Giving the government access to such a thing could be construed as self-incrimination.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|